Possible Health Concerns Associated With 3D Viewing
The world is getting all excited about 3D movie viewing and gaming and while it certainly sounds amazing, there may be some potential health risks involved, especially for younger children.
Those of you who plan to purchase the Nintendo 3DS for your kids or have a mind to bring 3D viewing into your home via a 3D HDTV and the PlayStation 3, should probably read this Audioholics article. You can form your own conclusions, but it talks about how humans utilize stereoscopic vision and how continued exposure to 3D video viewing could, theoretically, mess with that ability. Stereoscopic vision begins developing when we first start using our eyes, and most experts agree that it's complete by the time we turn six. That's when the nerves and muscles behind the eye are "fully formed and have learned to work in conjunction with the brain to respond automatically to visual cues that provide seamless depth of vision."
However, you may not know about strabismus:
"Unfortunately there’s a malaise in children that can prevent full stereopsis from developing, called strabismus. This condition is also called lazy-eye but has nothing to do with laziness; it’s an abnormal alignment of the eyes in which the eyes don’t focus on the same object and depth perception is compromised.
There is treatment for strabismus that involves helping a child’s nervous system to learn stereopsis, causing it to eventually become a natural response. But the ability to re-learn has its limitations, and treatment has been met with limited success beyond a certain age."
Recent medical evidence suggests that the nervous system "never stops learning and re-learing" so in other words, it's never too late to treat strabismus...while on the flip side of the coin, it's never too late to contract strabismus. The chances of contracting this illness lessens after the age of seven and - presumably - as we get older, but the risk may still be there. Just something to consider from a health standpoint.
Personally, I have no intention of over-indulging in 3D; I've always believed that might have some sort of backlash, like headaches or something.
Tags: 3d, games, movies, dangerous
6/27/2010 9:41:32 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (58 posts)
bigrailer19
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 10:09:12 PM
Riku994
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 10:11:43 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:01:57 PM
Riku994
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:05:28 PM
SvenMD
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:22:57 PM
Ayane
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:25:48 PM
Jawknee
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:39:48 PM
Riku994
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 8:55:44 AM
Jawknee
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 10:29:59 AM
JPBooch
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 2:17:17 PM
Riku994
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 9:11:44 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 10:08:27 PM
Reply
Cesar_ser_4
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 5:27:57 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 4:20:58 PM
StangMan80
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 10:35:39 PM
Reply
CHAOS THEORY X
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 10:39:32 PM
Reply
SvenMD
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:24:51 PM
johnld
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 12:01:26 AM
DemonNeno
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 10:43:03 PM
Reply
Seriously though. I doubt this will be a bull blown epidemic. It may, however, warrant a reason for a user-beware implemented warning. No different than that whole Epilepsy warning games have. Siezing from too much machine gun feedback sounds scary, but how often have people (including those with epilepsy) triggered an seizure from it?
Food for thought! Interesting read, Ben!
BikerSaint
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:52:42 PM
Qubex
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:17:57 PM
Reply
The 3D revolution should have been spearheaded by the PS4... I feel the PS4 will have the power we really wanted and was promised by Sony in the PS3. PS3 is still a fantastic piece of work... but we will see what happens as it is pushed to the limits.
Q!
"play.experience.enjoy"
*Currently in SinCity, Singapore
Highlander
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 1:46:18 AM
I remember back in the old days, really old days, on the Atari 400 and 800 home computers (these pre-dated even the 800XL from Atari) there was a technique that evolved that allowed those systems to display more than the 16 colors they were supposed to be able to display. Those systems featured a combination of graphics processing elements that could be considered a rudimentary GPU. programmers would rewrite the color information in the list of graphics commands (the display list) allowing the system to display up to 128 colors on screen at one time.
More of the same redefining limits happened with the original PS2 which was not supposed to be capable of progressive scan. Except that the games late in the life of the system (eg SC3, Madden and GT4) were able to produce progressive scan output on the PS2 by directly driving the output with software instead of relying on the basic hardware. This essentially redefined the limits of what could be done on the PS2.
I'm just saying that I don't think we'll see the PS3 reach it's limits until the folks at Insomniac, Naughty Dog, and a few other first party studios come out and say that there's no more headroom left. However sine they all say that they are still finding more power in there, I think we're OK for another year or two...
Orvisman
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 8:11:02 AM
BikerSaint
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:58:49 PM
kraygen
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 1:52:37 AM
SvenMD
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 8:09:04 AM
main_event05
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 11:29:31 PM
Reply
johnld
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 12:05:34 AM
Highlander
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 12:24:42 AM
Reply
I suspect that those people who are easily susceptible to motion sickness will have the most problems with 3D, along with those who have epilepsy or other types of seizure disorder.
Highlander
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 2:13:45 AM
___________
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 3:03:11 AM
i always suffer motion sickness in the car or sea sickness on the boat.
i cant read in the car, i cant watch a movie in the car, i cant play my PSP in the car.
but for some reason 3D does not give me motion sickness.
i stayed playing metro 2033 in 3D for 4 hours straight the other night and i was fine.
i think it may have something to do with the different types of 3D being used.
when i went to watch the avatar at the Imax which uses the polarized technique it gave me a headache.
but when i went to see COTT in 3D at event cinema who use real D i was fine.
i was talking to my tafe teacher the other day and he said he thinks its due to the polarized technique used in some 3D content, it causes strain on the eyes and there fore gives some people headaches.
___________
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 2:58:35 AM
Reply
but with that said what is not bad for your health?
honestly, if we were to stay away from thing that are bad for us than we would be confined to our rooms doing nothing all day!
as the saying goes everything in moderation.
playing games for extended periods of time, or staring at screens for extended periods of time is bad for your eyes.
does that mean we should stop playing games?
its bad for your health to go outside because the sun could give you skin cancer so does that mean we should stay inside all day?
people take these things far to sensetivley, somethings bad for us, so we have to stay 10 KMs away from it at all times.
honestly, lifes too short to avoid things.
if its fun, DO IT!
as bart simpson said, live hard, die young, and leave a big fat corpse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CrazyIrishBoy
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 12:50:23 PM
JackC8
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 7:15:23 AM
Reply
Oh well, cant' afford it any way.
dork02840
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 7:35:04 AM
Reply
CrazyIrishBoy
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 12:54:27 PM
Reply
I suppose if both eyes become lazy, "lazy eyes" :P you just have to start using them more! And stop using 3d for a while, u will look pretty stupid tho with two lazy eyes.
Im not joking thats actually how ive seen lazy eye been treated, the patch thing :P
Highlander
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 3:15:51 PM
CrazyIrishBoy
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 @ 12:13:00 PM
BikerSaint
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 3:56:44 PM
Reply
Toshiba designs "glasses free" 3D display
http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/49540-toshiba-designs-glasses-free-3d-display
Hitachi touts "glasses-free" 3D display
http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/49358-hitachi-touts-glasses-free-3d-display
Sharp announces four-color 3D LCD displays
http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/49327-sharp-announces-four-color-3d-lcd-displays
Monster's "universal" 3D shutter glasses aren't crazy expensive
http://www.tgdaily.com/consumer-electronics-brief/50317-monsters-universal-3d-shutter-glasses-arent-crazy-expensive
Disney signs 3D deal with Imax
http://www.tgdaily.com/games-and-entertainment-brief/50334-disney-signs-3d-deal-with-imax
BikerSaint
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 4:04:34 PM
Reply
UK Boy's Eyesight Saved By Mario Kart June 25, 2010
At the age of 4 Ben Michaels was diagnosed with amblyopia, commonly known as "lazy eye syndrome."
The condition caused the vision in his right eye to gradually decrease over time. If it had gone untreated, Ben would have completely lost the vision in his right eye.
But a clever doctor came up with a unique therapy to help Ben strengthen the vision in his right eye gradually over time using a Nintendo DS, Mario Kart and an eye patch.
That therapy saw Ben's vision in his right eye go from "near blindness" to an improvement of "250 percent."
Read the full story here:
http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/06/25/uk-boy039s-eyesight-saved-mario-kart
BikerSaint
Monday, June 28, 2010 @ 4:08:34 PM
Reply
http://www.tgdaily.com/games-and-entertainment-features/49053-skeptical-sony-questions-nintendo-3ds-announcement
***(Related to Sony's above story)****
NVIDIA unconnected with 3DS
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/nvidia-unconnected-with-3ds-blog-entry
Report: Nintendo 3DS is Tegra-less
http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/50127-report-nintendo-3ds-is-tegra-less
ThePoetRazel
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 @ 5:35:28 PM
Reply
It's sensationalist nonsense full of allusions to conspiracys.
Like all smart pseudo-science, they place enough real science around their claims to make it appear that their claims are backed up by science.
I think i'd rather take my health advice from qualified professionals and respected medical health journals. When the Lancet has an article on the dangers of stereoscopic tech, i'll listen. Until then, i'll remain skeptical of this sort of nonsense.
Highlander
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 @ 11:20:18 PM

See Full Image









Riku994
Reply
Sunday, June 27, 2010 @ 10:04:58 PM