PS3 News: Sony's Guidelines For 3D Gaming: Only 720p Resolution - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Sony's Guidelines For 3D Gaming: Only 720p Resolution

There's nothing better than gorgeous 1080p high definition for games or movies. ...well, perhaps maybe engaging 3D in 720p?

For the most part, that will be the trade-off, according to what a Sony representative said during this past week's Develop conference. The "official guidelines" for 3D games on the PS3 set the resolution to 720p; even if a game runs natively in 1080p, it will be downscaled in 3D mode for two 720p images, "one for each eye." Sony's Simon Benson did confirm that the PS3 is capable of displaying a 1080p 3D image (it would have to, if 1080p Blu-Ray movies are going 3D), but keeping that maxed resolution for games comes at the expense of the much-desired 60 frames per second, which is available at 720p. For the record, Blu-Ray movies run at 24 frames per second. So although "a more cinematic game" might work well with a lower frame rate at 1080p 3D, for the most part, 720p will be the standard for high-definition 3D interactive entertainment. But here's the good news: Benson says that in 3D, "even trained computer graphics artists could barely tell the difference between the resolutions."

I can imagine it'd be difficult to pick out resolution differences when immersed in 3D. And of course, most games don't play natively in 108p, anyway, although that might change in the future.

Tags: ps3, playstation 3, 3d games

7/16/2010 12:26:31 PM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (72 posts)

StangMan80
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 12:45:11 PM
Reply

All my games are 720i/p except one... Madden 10(1080p)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

GuernicaReborn
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:32:25 PM

Maybe you can chalk this one up to a bad memory, but I've never heard of 720i, just p.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:38:28 PM

Nope, GT5 will be 1080p. I think Uncharted 2 is 1080p too. There are quite a few games that are 1080p which I cannot remember now...

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:47:53 PM

Uncharted 2 natively supports 720p. But d@mn, does it look fine.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

djbool
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 4:47:21 PM

Yeah only the biggest games seem to have 1080p/i (i.e. Uncharted 2 and MW2)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

FullmetalX10
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 6:08:50 PM

@djbool, umm dude, as I recall call of duty: modern warfare 2 runs even below 720p, somewhere in the 500-600 realm.
Uncharted 2, as shams said, also doesn't run in 1080p natively, but in 720p, still it looks fine as hell.

Last edited by FullmetalX10 on 7/16/2010 6:09:49 PM

Agree with this comment 6 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

bigrailer19
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 7:25:56 PM

absolutely right, most games only run natively at 720p that includes Uncharted 2. So this shouldn't matter, unless your trying to find another reason to hate on 3d.

GOW 3 runs at 1080i, as well does KZ2. MGS4 runs at 1080p though. I have a handful of other games at 1080p/i (mostly i) but other than that the majority are at 720p so this makes no difference to me. Not to mention Even if I stared very closely at my t.v. for hours, When playing a game the resolution is already much higher than a t.v. show, they look fantastic regardless. Uncharted 2 is testament to that!

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Him
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 7:38:20 PM

I agree that you can hardly tell the difference between 1080p and 720p on any TV 50" or less. just look at Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 they both look almost the same. (except the water graphics) UC2 runs at 720p and KZ2 runs at 1080i.

The developers of uncharted 2 wanted the game to run at 720P because they wanted to boost texture resolution. Ever notice that there was never one single blurry texture in uncharted? (correct me if i'm wrong) Even Killzone 2 was at first going to be 720p but for reasons I don't know, they made it up to 1080i.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 8:45:03 PM

We probably ought to define these HD modes better.

720p - 1280x720 resolution, progressive scan, a full resolution image is sent with each frame (1280x720 = 1MPixel) .
720p60 - 60 frames per second, progressive scan, 1280x720 resolution.
720p30 - 30 frames per second, progressive scan, 1280x720 resolution.
720i - there is no 720i standard.
1080p - 1920x1080 resolution, progressive scan, every frame sent is a full 2Mpixel 1920x1080 image.
1080p24 - 24 frames per second, 1920x1080 resolution, progressive scan
1080p30 - 30 frames per second, 1920x1080 resolution, progressive scan
1080p60 - 60 frames per second, 1920x1080 resolution, progressive scan - the gold standard of HD.
1080i - interlaced 1920x1080. Each image (also called a field) sent is 1920 X 540 and two fields are interlaced to form a complete frame. it's effectively 30 frames a second, but because of the way the TV de-interlaces the fields into frames, it's presented as if it was 60 frames per second.

Other things to note, 720p TVs can de-interlace and down-scale 1080i to their own native resolution, which is why 720p TVs are also 1080i compatible.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Condemnedsoul23
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 9:47:50 PM

@ GuernicaReborn there's 720 I/P and 1080 I/P with P being top. It's ahrd to tell the difference and I is nowhere enar as comming as it used to be since 1080 P is everywhere. My first HD tv was 1080 I and I still have it. Obviously it would be better than both 720 verisons but not as good as 1080 P but barely.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Temjin001
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 1:39:33 PM

Just got to insert something here about GT5 and 1080p. It isn't being rendered at an actual 1920x1080p, rather 1280x1080p w/2xMSAA.
And while it's running in 720p mode (to those who don't have a 1080p set, or, those who consciously select 720p as the output feed from the XMB) the MSAA gets bumped up to 4x.

If you want a great look at full 1920x1080p @ 60fps just turn your attention towards Ridge Racer 7. A fav arcade racer of mine.
WipeOut HD is good, too. But it fudges a little with a scaleable res while racing.
And if my memory serves me right, insanely, those who remember Full Auto (you know the one with the cars and guns) it runs a 1080p + 4x MSAA !!!???. Framerate is destroyed because of it. But go ahead guys!. Go download the RR7 and Full Auto demo off PSN to see the clarity in action!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 5:56:02 PM

@Temjin,

Doesn't Ridge Raver 7 kinda make you wish that Namco Bandai still made games that well?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Temjin001
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 7:58:28 PM

@Highlander

I'm glad you like RR7.
And come to think of it I can't remember the last good Namco game I've played outside of their traditional games. You may know this already, but back in the early days of PSX, Namco was a major contributor to the Playstation brand.

To speak candidly about RR7.
While it's a fav racer of mine, and I enjoy it's unique brand of play, it's pretty antiquated in it's arcade roots. I'm beginning to wonder if the way the cars power-slide will begin to look pretty comical as gaming console graphics enhance. But I'm sure I'll enjoy the intense gameplay none-the-less.

I'm just glad Namco still throws a bone to the fans who've been behind the series since the beginning. It seems like a tradition for them to have a RR to coincide with many system launches, and all of Sony's, even the PSP.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 11:27:59 PM

Oh, I like RR7 alright, it's very arcady - which is *fine* with me, I'm not always looking for a driving simulator...

As for Namco, the last good game of theirs I played was Soul Calibur 4 which was a visual feast, but the actual game play modes and story were inferior to Soul Calibur 3 and 2 on the PS2. A pity, I had hoped that with the upgrade on the PS3, they'd do even better, but it appaears that they spent all that time that could have gone into a more engaging and in-depth SP mode, on multi-player online play - which wasn't liked by many anyway (too much la.aa.a.aa.gg.gg.gg.g.g.g.gg).

When they decided not to bring the most recent tales game to the west I was very disappointed with them. I just hope that the rumored news about the next (and final?) tales game coming to the PS3 is true, and that it comes westward as well.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

maxpontiac
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 12:53:22 PM
Reply

No worries here. 720p still looks good to me.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

AcHiLLiA
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:22:17 PM

yah, at least 720p is better than 480p. For 3D it sounds good for the start and later in the future they will progress higher.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 12:54:15 PM
Reply

And of course, most games don't play natively in 108p, anyway, although that might change in the future.

Well, I'd hope most games run at a far higher resolution than that. :P

Hasn't this been common knowledge for a while now? I remember reading several months ago that it was all but impossible to render a game in both 3D and 1080p because it was far too much of a drain on te processing capabilities of the system. Either way, I'm still not sold on 3D, even watching Avatar I found that the two images were overlapping each other, which makes me think there must be an optimal viewing range for it. I don't like the idea of having to sit a certain distance away to get the full effect. It'll be good for those that are interested though.

Peace.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:05:47 PM

You can render a game in 3D 1080p60 if you want to. The PS3 can handle that. However, the 'trick' is that to do that, your textures and effects need to be simple and sparse and there really doesn't need to be a lot going on on-screen. In terms of the number of pixels and the data rate required, the PS3 can push 3D 1080p60, but you'd be stuck with games that use lots of simple geometry and Goraud shading - which wouldn't really sell it, you know?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:08:21 PM

You should get an avitar. I keep associating you with the anonymous cowherd.

In terms of the 3D movement, I'm not entirely sold on 3D either. But for me it's more about motion sickness and my weak lil' belly. I think if images are overlapping, I'd be forced to play all my games 100% sober!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:49:37 PM

Highlander, yes, simple games for 3D HD 1080p... however after reading an in-depth article from Digital Foundry about that very question, and going into a lot of detail of how demanding it actually is, it does prove my earlier assumption that the PS3 is peaking at its limits with doing 3D...

Basically, a more comfortable zone, with full 3D HD 1080p and no compromise on texture and mode; quality/complexity would be on the PS4... that is when my 3D experience will start. in a few years time :)

There is quite a bit of trickery to get the PS3 to purr nicely in 3D with a decent frame rate... but 720p should cover the majority of gamers with adequate quality...

Of course a decent PC rig today will really blow the PS3 out of the water... hello Fermi :)

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:15:30 PM

@ Highlander,
I know it can be done, but like you said, not in any game that would feel truly current gen. Best wait for the PS4 IMO. Also, I've been meaning to ask, does 3D take up more disc space than 2D?

@ Underdog,
I really should, but I'm having trouble deciding on a picture that I'd like to use as a representation of myself. I know it's only a signature, but still. Also, you're comparing me to a New South Welshman? That's just rude.

@ Qubex,
Yeah, pretty much what you said.

Peace.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

fluffer nutter
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:32:58 PM

The two popular types of 3D, that I have read about, are not able to handle 3D at 1080P. I was looking for updates on this, last night, and everything points to 720P because of technique and hardware capabilities. Nvidia has the handle on 3D in 1080P and so far have the only released solution.

Does that sound right?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:07:00 PM

Yes and no. I don't think that you'll have top wait for the PS4 for 3D gaming to arrive. 720p in 3D will be quite sufficient for the majority of people. Remember there are still people claiming not to see any major difference between SD and HD.

The point I was making is that it's possible to render 3D in 1080p60 with the current hardware. what matters is what you are doing besides the final render and display. Obviously a game trying to run at that resolution is limited in terms of what else it can do.

However at 3D at 720p60 results in a 30 frames per second 3D equivalent because two frames are required for each 3D 'frame' seen by the viewer.

Asking the PS3 to do 720p60 is not a problem, and many game developers have shown that they are very adept at producing complex images at 720p60. So I have no doubt that as time passes 3D games in 720p60 will not only look good, they'll play well.

Sure there is a difference going up to 1080p, but you know what, the absolute majority of games today run at 720p, for a variety of reasons. However the point is that the additional work to render 3D in 720p is the 3D processing along because the console is already rendering 60 frames per second. By sticking to 720p resolution and framerates, the impact of adding the 3D burden to a game engine is lightened.

At the end of the day, 3D games in 720p are going to be more than good enough for most.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Fane1024
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 7:12:23 PM

@Lawless

If you can't decide on an image, you could use your PSN portable ID (do they have those on the PAL PlayStation site?). I couldn't settle on anything better, so I figured something is better than nothing.

Or, you could always go with a pic of Lucy Lawless until you think of something better.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 12:48:21 AM

Yeah, I can't access my PSN account, so that idea is out, and I swear I would shoot myself before using a picture of Lucy Lawless.

Peace.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:16:38 PM
Reply

Bluray will natively display at 24, 30, or 60fps depending on the content and whether your bluray player 1080p/24fps setting, whatever it's called, is turned on, and the content supports that. Why choose 24fps over 30? Supposedly, it reduces screen-judder as cinema is filmed at 24fps. Regular tv programs are filmed at 30fps, for the most part, and video is 60fps. These are North American standards, so it may be different in europe, as I know their TV's historically have operated at higher framerate/frequency.


Of course, additionally, some TV's support the 1080p/24fps cinema feature. But w/o it selected or turned on, those motionflow/automotion features intermittently can boost the framerate anywhere from 60fps to 240fps, consequently giving regular cinema that "video" look.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:45:15 PM

Woops, I meant to capitalize "Europe".

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:06:51 PM

My new TV does that. It's pretty crazy.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Beamboom
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 5:21:46 PM

@shams: "Regular tv programs are filmed at 30fps" -> that's on NTSC (usa). PAL (europe) is 24fps.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:18:29 PM
Reply

How come games mostly only get up to 720p at 30fps then?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:43:22 PM

That is typically the sweet spot with the current generation of consoles, and their RAM limitations. A higher resolution or framerate would mean less detailed textures, fewer polygons and on screen assets, or a compromise in performance such as late-texture loading, screen-tearing, slow-down, input lag (late or irresponsive controls).

So my fear with 3D, is even at 720p/30fps, we will see the same kinds of compromises (fewer on screen assets and simpler textures), which is a bummer for those like myself who won't be opting for 3D early.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:03:37 PM

You sure its the sweet spot for all consoles or just one in particular?

Wipe Out HD looks stunning. There is a different difference between 1080p and 720p. Depending on ones preference it may not matter.

720p is fine with me. its just a shame a lot of multiplat games are rendered lower then that.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:14:53 PM

Games should be running at 720p60, not 30. 720p60 is the target both HD console makers want their developers to hit.

Shams is right about the limitations of the hardware and memory. It's a balancing act between resolution, framerate, detail, post effects and the needs of the game. A lot of developers try to shoehorn in more post effects to make their game look great, but that can cause the framerate to drop. variable framerates can jar the eye, so most developers lock their framerate at 30 if they cannot lock it at 60.

PS3 games are a little different to the 360 because on the PS3 the Cell can handle a lot of the work that is traditionally done by a GPU. Even though GPUs are highly optimized, some post effects may be better done on the Cell. As developers learn this, and improve we are seeing more and more PS3 games with solid 720p60 framerates and lots of effects/detail on screen. 3D geometry is something that the Cell's SPEs are ideal for, so adding 3D processing to PS3 games has a limited impact.

So as more games go to 720p60, we should see in the future some good results in 3D 720p because of the experience gained using the SPEs to get to true 720p60 now.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:17:31 PM

The thing is, people keep saying the PS3 can play games at 1080p and 60fps, but only the simpler games do that. Why couldn't something like GOWIII be at that level? Was it just too expensive?

Even though the textures on Dante's Inferno were nowhere near the level of GOWIII the motion was much smoother at 60fps.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:24:18 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong but i thought Stig said they decided on 30fps because they didn't want us to miss the action.

Maybe it was just an excuse.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:36:47 PM

@worlds,

In rough terms it breaks down like this.

1080p60 is 60 2Mpixel frames per second. 720p60 is 60 1Mpixel frames per second.

So purely in terms of the amount of video data and processing involved, 1080p60 is twice the work of 720p60. Most games today have trouble rendering at 720p60 today - regardless of console. A lot of the time developers will drop the resolution to maintain the framerate and so we get sub HD resolutions with 60 frames per second. Some developers have come forward and said they would rather keep the resolution high and drop the framerate, so some games render at 720p30 but look utterly gorgeous. The thing is that the framerate at 30 is fine as long as it's absolutely locked and the game isn't a blur of motion. 30 frames per second works for games that are not insanely quick.

So, to do 1080p60, developers would have to double the amount of work being done, texture sizes would go up and the amount of calculation for particle effects, object tracking and collision detection would all go up. 1080p60 works for games that use simpler textures or in the rare instance where a developer has literally worked for years to perfect their game engine to run at 1080p for their specific game (GT5 for example).

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 7:05:39 PM

That's kinda what I thought, I just wonder if our favorite system could handle the kind of output they keep saying it is capable of. And I wonder, since devving games is already extremely expensive, if we will ever routinely cross the threshold into 1080p with 60fps or if it just isn't doable because of time and expense. In which case gaming will stall and no longer advance graphicswise.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 8:29:55 PM

With the right game and the right optimization 1080p60 is doable. But it's a huge load on the system. In most instances a game that actually renders at 1080i is rendering the equivalent of a full 1080p frame, just at half the frame rate. Unless a game requires break neck speed, if it can render at 1080i, you will see no practical difference between 1080i and 1080p. 1080i60 is effectively 1920x1080 @ 30 frames per second, which is as good or better than a BluRay movie. I honestly don't think people will complain about games that manage 1080i60. 1080p60 would be sexy as all get out, but very hard to do with current hardware, and compared to 1080i60 the difference is small.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

DjEezzy
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:20:20 PM
Reply

I'm honestly totally into the 3d movement. The picture is unlike what you see at the movies. Close, but watching a bluray on a 3d plasma was absolutely amazing. The picture was so much better than what you see at the theatre. The detail is outstanding. Ever since i saw that i've been trying to get rid of both of my 42 LCD's. So so i could get just one 3d tv. Believe me when i tell you that it really isn't a gimmick. I seriously have an itch to play a 3d game now. LOL

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Crabba
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:24:22 PM
Reply

Well, with the exception of Wipeout HD, aren't practically ALL PS3 games 720p already?? So since basically all PS3 games already max out at 720p it's not exactly surprising that games with the addition of 3D (which could as much as double the amount of processing required) would not be able to handle 1080p.

The more important question is: will new 3D capable games be able to handle 720p with the same amount of graphics detail as without 3D, most likely not...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:41:18 PM

Nope, there are a few games that can be rendered natively 1080p.

A couple of the PSN titles (besides WipeOut HD), and some of the AAA games like GT5 for example.

Soldner X, Trine, Super Stardust HD are 1080p native from what I can tell too...

Highlander will probably have a decent idea of some of the games that do in-fact render at 1080p natively. The above are the ones I remember off hand.

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Last edited by Qubex on 7/16/2010 1:44:06 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:52:41 PM

The way to have your ps3 upscale your games from 720p to 1080p is to go into the Resolutions settings under the Display settings, deselect 720p, and select 1080p. For some games, you might see a hit on the performance (more frequent slow-down) but their are quite a few that play just fine with no noticeable hit.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:04:52 PM

Not all games will upscale if you do this. A great many of them actually downscale to 480p instead. Kinda crappy. I only have a couple in my collection that actually upscale. I've tested it on all of my games. Most downscale.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:07:16 PM

What Shams said. Or at least MGS4 ran at 1080p when I did that, so I assume that it works for most, if not all games.

Peace.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:12:33 PM

MGS4 should run at 1080p without forcing it to upscale. It does on my TV.

And it doesn't work for all games. RE5 downscales, Uncharted 2 downscales etc. As i said most games in my collection downscale to 480p.

Would be nice if it worked for all games but it doesn't unfortunately.

Last edited by Jawknee on 7/16/2010 2:15:23 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:20:09 PM

@ Jawknee,
The cutscenes displayed natively at 1080p, but in game it ran at 720p until I turned the option off. I don't really know what to make of that.

Peace.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:25:27 PM

For MGS4?

If i hit the info button on my TV it will tell me the resolution and its 1080p 100% of the time unforced.

Weird that its not doing it for you. Maybe its the difference in TV's? Some TV's upscale too do they not?

Last edited by Jawknee on 7/16/2010 2:31:31 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:41:28 PM

Don't ask me, every time it switched between the two I got an info box popping up saying it had changed resolutions. Probably is the TV, but whatever eh, still works just fine.

Peace.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:25:09 PM

Well, actually the PS3 can scale, there is a scaler built in, but it's not accessible to the user. Sham's advice is correct for the PS3 when displaying the XMB, PS Store and web brower, or viewing video. However when running a game, the hardware ignores the user's resolution setting (to an extent).

What happens is that if the game renders at 720p, and the PS3 is set to only display 1080p, the game will render at 720p, send the 720p video feed out the HDMI and the TV will upconvert the 720p to 1080p. If you leave the 1080i option ticked, many games have the ability to render in 720p and scale the image to 1080i for display. In this case the PS3 will actually output the game in 1080i, though your TV will again upconvert to 1080p. Remember 1080p is a superset of 720p, that is a screen that can handle a 1080p feed can implicitly handle a 720p feed. If for any reason the TV connected to the PS3 doesn't handle 720p the console should revert to 480p automatically, and all PS3 games are required to be capable of switching to a 480p output.

Let me re-iterate. The display resolution selected in the XMB system settings is only valid for the XMB, PS Store, web browser and DVD/BluRay playback. Gmaes override that setting with whatever they netively render at, and can upscale to several different modes depending on what the developer has decided to do. You cannot force your PS3 to upscale a 720p game into 1080p. That up-conversion is performed by your TV.

*ALL* 1080p capable TVs automatically up-scale HD video sources to fill the screen. In other words they all up-convert to 1080p. 1080i sources are de-interlaced so they also appear to be 1080p. The fact that the 360 has a scaler built into it that the user can control is actually pretty pointless.

Last edited by Highlander on 7/16/2010 3:25:54 PM

Agree with this comment 6 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:33:32 PM

So what causes it to downscale to 480p when your TV is a 1080p set?

For example, i unchecked everything but 1080p and when i turn RE5 or Uncharted 2 on it downcales to 480p. My TV is capable of 1080p.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:43:56 PM

@Wreckless

No, look, you're not getting this. The 360 can scale a 720p image to 1080p, but scaling the image is simply stretching it. It's the exact same process that your 1080p TV will do. You don't gain anything by having the 360 do it. I know that the PS3 doesn't do the scaling itself. Why should it? It's utterly redundant since the TV can perform the scaling. You fail to see the point because you don't understand it.

The fact that the 360 has a scaler that you can use to over-ride the game's rendering resolution has *zero* impact on the image you see. If you tell your 360 to output at 1080p, it will, but the image was still rendered at 720p before being stretched to fit the 1080p resolution. The scaler doesn't do anything magical to add any detail. An identical image on a ps3 displayed in 720p resolution on a 1080p TV *will* be upscaled by the TV to 1080p and will be visually identical to the 1080p image displayed by the 360.

In fact, if anything letting the TV do the scaling might result in a better image since the TV scaler is specifically designed, and purpose built to scale images and ehnance the quality of that upscaled image.

@Jawknee,
That's a great question that I don't have the answer to Jawknee. Is it only those two games? Do you have your PS3 set to display in all modes (480i/p, 720p 1080i/p)?

I have an even weirder issue, that is - I think - a TV problem. My son's PS3/TV cannot display at anything other than 480p on the screen. The screen works just fine displaying DTV in any resolution, and it works fine at it's native resolution as PC monitor. However the PS3 just can't get it to do more than 480p.

I've tried replacing the cable, with no effect. So, I tried switching the PS3. Guess what, it's not the PS3s fault, it's the TV. Something weird in the HDMI interface is causing the TV not to talk nicely with the PS3. I haven't been able to resolve the issue. I even tried the old reliable complete power down and disconnect for several hours methodology - nothing.

Last edited by Highlander on 7/16/2010 3:49:41 PM

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 5:00:01 PM

That is strange indeed. Wonder if the TV is just defective.

As for what games downscale, just about all of them that i have tried. Killzone 2 and God of War III will upscale to 1080i but if i uncheck 720p and 1080i and leave 1080p checked it downscales them to 480p. Just about all the games in my collection do this except MW1. That one will upscale to 1080p if i do the same unchecking.

If i have the PS3 set to display all modes all my games except MGS4 will stay at 720p while MGS4 displays in 1080p. I've ran through all my games, testing to see if any of them upscale to 1080p like God of War III and Killzone 2 will upscale to 1080i but the end result is a downscale. You can even tell the difference when you open the XMB while the game is running. Everything is larger and looks dirty.

@wreckless, there's no need to be confrontational. He knows his stuff. So relax mang.

EDIT: Interesting, i just unchecked 720p and left 1080i and 1080p checked and now Uncharted 2 is displaying in 1080i. RE5 still downscales to 480p. Seems to very depending on the developer.

Last edited by Jawknee on 7/16/2010 5:07:31 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 8:23:58 PM

The developer has to include the option to output 1080i. If they don't then what I think will happen is that say for example you have a game that renders at 720p, but the developer didn't include code to handle the scaling operation to do 1080i, or the game was developed before Sony exposed that functionality so it wasn't included in the development process. If you disable 720p output by unchecking that box, the game be reading that system setting to check what modes are available and seeing that 720p is disabled. In that case the game has no way to scale to 1080i, it thinks it can't output 720p and so it defaults to 480p, which is the next best.

That is why when you plug your PS3 into a TV you let it auto-discover what modes the TV supports and leave the ones detected enabled.

Remember that the TV will always scale the image to fill the screen. So with a 1080p TV, 720p will be scaled up and 1080i will be de-interlaced. With the PS3, the XMB will always display in the best mode available, so you shouldn't need to disable 720p to get it to use 1080p.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shadow_Ninja
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 1:55:41 PM
Reply

yea ben, i've never heard of any type of game displaying at 108p either.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:05:36 PM
Reply

This is fine with me. I just hope this doesn't encourage devs to forgo 1080p games entirely.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:18:37 PM

I think that, if anything, it would open the eyes of these developers. If a game can run at 720p natively in 3D, then surely they will realise that 1080p games are possible.

Peace.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 2:26:49 PM

I hope so. We need to see more games like Wipe Out HD. i never payed much attention to that game until i downloaded for free with Playstation Plus.

Man it looks great. Imagine Uncharted 2 or Killzone 3 in 1080p native.

Last edited by Jawknee on 7/16/2010 2:30:35 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:27:51 PM

720p60 in 3D only means that the game sends two 30 frames per second for each eye. no more data is sent than for a conventional 720p60 feed. doing 3D in 720p does not imply that 1080p games are any more, or less possible.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 3:18:40 PM
Reply

Make full, graphic intensive epic games like Uncharted 3 run at 1080p and I'll believe them.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 5:28:01 PM
Reply

This is terrible news. I'm sorry, but I'd rather have all my games at 1080p then to have them in 3d. This is one of my complaints with 3d. Until they can do it in 1080p at 60fps, then I'm just not sold.

There might not be a huge difference between 720p and 1080p, but why should I settle? If we're going with that mentality we might as well join in with the ppl who don't notice the difference between SD and HD.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

bigrailer19
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 7:30:12 PM

Ur complaint is well, both rational and disregarded.

Most games only display natively at 720p anyways, and yes that includes one of the best looking titles to date, Uncharted 2.
I suppose next you'll tell me it didn't look that good because of that.

I have a decent sized library of PS3 games, and I can count on one hand, the amount of games that display natively at 1080p, so there isn't a lot out there in favor of your argument. And regardless, while watching 3d, Its going to be tough to see the miniscule differences in resolution anyways.


Last edited by bigrailer19 on 7/16/2010 7:31:34 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

bigrailer19
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 7:41:38 PM

I'll give you the fact that maybe you just dont want 3d in that case, fine, I understand.

Just don't say "This is terrible news." When in reality its not. We've been playing most games at 720p from the start of this generation anyways. No need to get upset or bash 3d because it will project in 720p.

We are rarely seeing 1080p natively, at 60fps anyways. So are u not "sold" on UC2, KZ2, GOW3 etc. etc?

Last edited by bigrailer19 on 7/16/2010 7:43:36 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 11:56:28 PM

Yes well what you say is true, but I was looking forward to more and more games playing in 1080p. The reason I say this is terrible news, is because, if 3d is only going for 720p, then ppl aren't going to be reaching for that 1080p quality.

I want all games to come out in 1080p and more and more were starting to, but this means the downfall of that trend if they continue utilizing 3d in this way.

I'm not against 3d in particular, I'm against settling for sub par 3d. As I have said, I'll get 3d when it is up to the quality of full HD capabilities.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 1:08:11 AM

@kraygen,

Games in 1080p would be sweet, but the majority of people haven't yet switched to HDTV, so it's a little redundant. Not only that although the PS3 is capable of some games in 1080p, it's pretty much maxed out by the effort. I'm not sure that a game like Uncharted 2 could be done in 1080p with the current hardware. It might manage 1080i, nut 1080p is a step beyond that. It's not too bad though, with so many people just getting onto the HD express, there are a few years of transition left before people will expect everything at 1080i/p. By that time the PS4 should be here and will definitely be capable of handling 1080p and 3D.

In the mean time just doing 720p 3D games is a massive achievement. Remember when the PS 3launched 3D wasn't even on the horizon for home use, and many were still questioning the need for HD at all.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 12:13:53 PM

@ Highlander

I understand that, but the way I see it, it only gives credence to what I'm saying. Not everyone has moved on to HD, so why bring about 3d so quickly.

If ppl haven't gotten to HD yet, then catering to 3d right now is only going to give something to a select few ppl who have money to throw around.

More ppl are able to enjoy 1080p than 3d, even tho the ps3 can do 3d, doesn't mean it should do it right now.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Temjin001
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 2:22:28 PM

Hey Kraygen, I understand your desire to see all things 1080p. It really would be nice, and we sort of were led to believe we would with PS3 pre-release press conferences etc. But as the rubber began to meet the road, even before PS3's release the PC-tech-head community had already sized up the bandwidth abilities of the RSX (and Xenos). Who resolved that we probably would rarely see anything running at true 1920x1080p.. and so far, they were right.

But take it from an ex-PC gamer who used to go nuts over this junk. Games offer a whole lot more to value than the quantity of pixels on the screen. Enjoy what you have now, and anticipate that some years down the road we'll probably get to see 1080p @ 60fps.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 9:04:11 PM
Reply

Does this mean we're not ready for 3D yet?

Or 3D is still far from complete?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bigrailer19
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 10:59:35 PM

Really?

It means nothing can handle, what it takes to run at 1080p, 60fps well enough. Something would take a hit wther it be textures or what have you. Read everything Highlander said on this post and you'll see.

Again we don't even see a game that runs natively at 1080p and 60fps, very often anyways.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 1:11:13 AM

A PlayStation that is about 4 times as powerful as the PS3 with a better GPU and lot's more memory would make 1080p games a reality, even in 3D. But the PS3 is probably capable of 720p in 3D at a push. I'll bet that we see a lot of games feature a 2D mode that runs full 720p/1080i and a 3D mode that renders somewhere between 576p and 720p. In other words, slightly sub-HD, just as many multi-platform titles currently do.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

RebelJD
Friday, July 16, 2010 @ 11:33:09 PM
Reply

720p looks just as great as 1080p if you ask any "regular" person. I look forward in 3D impressing us all.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 2:49:00 AM
Reply

in 3D i dunno because i have not played around with it much yet.
but in standard 2D mode anyone and everyone can tell the difference between a 720P picture and a 1080P one.
when i bought my TV the sony D series was only 720P, 3 weeks later they released a new version exact same specs, same series as mine but 1080P instead of 720P.
now a next door neighbor bought the new 1080P one, and his set looks better playing high end games like GOW3 or uncharted 2.

even my old Asus which had a 1080P screen originally but it broke so i replaced it with a 720P screen and i was so pissed at Asus because they wanted 1000 bucks YES 1000 bucks for a freaking 15 inch LCD screen!!!!!!!!!
so i went for the third party 720P screen which was only 400!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Tom_Robertson
Saturday, July 17, 2010 @ 5:37:27 AM
Reply

F*@k 3D!

I'm absolutely not getting it until I have no other choice, and even then probably won't.

I'd rather play a game in full HD than in 3D and that goes for watching films aswell

Agree with this comment 0 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Do you regret buying the PS4 so early?
Nope, I love it!
Not really; I still play it plenty.
A little, I was hoping for more games.
Yes, I could've waited.

Previous Poll Results