Hey Square-Enix: Final Fantasy Versus XIII Is Your Last Chance
I remember it like it was yesterday: perusing the game store shelves and looking for just about anything with "Squaresoft" on the box. If I found one I hadn't played, it was probably coming home with me. One of the big reasons the original PlayStation was the king of RPGs was because a company called Squaresoft continually delivered top-notch titles, time and time again. It was amazing. In retrospect, I don't think we've seen such a stretch of undeniable mastery since...by anyone.
And although I will always love Final Fantasy, and I will even defend FFXIII as being a really, really great game (just not a great FF installment), Square-Enix has given me almost nothing that ranks in the upper stratosphere in the past decade. Sometimes, we just have to face up to facts and accept that the past is never coming back. I still recall thinking, "hey, Squaresoft and Enix coming together...so like, FF and Star Ocean merging...wow!" Yeah, not so much "wow," anymore. And so, this statement is just for you, Square-Enix: you've got one more chance. One. I will remain excited and enthusiastic for Final Fantasy Versus XIII all the way up until its release; I will hold out hope and sit down to play it with high expectations. All those brief updates have been incredibly encouraging - especially that bit about it being "like the old 2D FFs in HD" - and the early footage is impressive. It really looks great.
We still need some actual gameplay but for now, I'm holding tightly to a quickly diminishing faith; a faith that has been eroding away for years; a faith irrationally fueled by frequent reminiscing via FFVII and FFT. I know a third Kingdom Hearts might be on the way, but that's not a deal-cincher for me; the games are cool, but not necessarily my cup of tea. I'd play it (probably) but I want what the old Square was always known for: an epic, memorable, landmark RPG that helps to define a generation. You set the bar years ago; you can't just go and sit in a corner. Therefore, deliver on your last chance or you will be permanently downgraded on my own personal publisher ratings board. You can't continue to keep a top slot simply because of history, you know.
Related Game(s): Final Fantasy Versus XIII
Tags: final fantasy versus xiii, ff versus xiii, square-enix
8/19/2010 9:49:43 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (136 posts)
Zemus101
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 10:12:46 PM
Reply
Also, Just want to mention a few of my favorites from yesteryear that don't get mentioned often enough. Chrono Cross, Parasite Eve, and Front Mission 3. We could definitely use these on the PS Store! Please? No? Dang...
CHAOS THEORY X
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 10:23:18 PM
Reply
sunspider13
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 10:27:13 PM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:37:11 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 10:30:48 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 10:30:08 PM
Reply
This could bleed into another article though Ben, take a look around you, when this gen has there been a major success that defines the generation or the genre? JRPGs are dying or being watered down, the top selling FPS (MW2) is miles and miles behind the biggest technological achievement in FPS thus far (Killzone 2), fighting games are fun but aren't breaking any new ground. Even the GOTY and best TPS of all time (Uncharted 2) isn't burning up the charts like the lesser games out there (Gears of War).
So, apparently this gen quality isn't rewarded with the best sales, mediocrity is. I bet SE is fully happy with all the money they made on the FF name alone in XIII and don't even care that people thought it was a poor FF.
The behavior of the masses this gen confuse me and is dubious at best.
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 8/19/2010 10:31:39 PM
frostface
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 10:51:21 PM
I have no doubt R3 will be fantastic but will it be justly rewarded or will its sales pale in comparison to another MW or CoD clone?
As for FFXIII, I got it recently, it's my first FF and although I'm enjoying it, I've put it down for a few days and now browse over the case when I'm looking for something I actually want to play. I'd love to be able to compare it with other releases from the franchise but it's all I have to go on and it's good but not great.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:00:33 PM
No, in this industry, great games really do sell. We haven't reached the point of the movie industry where trash is the only thing that sells tickets; it's still basically the reverse in gaming. If the game scores a 9 or above, it's a guaranteed million-seller (at least). The best games of the generation are, for the most part, the best sellers. And when we say "best," we do have to include the likes of Gears and MW2 (if only for the multiplayer concerning the latter).
Hey, Heavy Rain can sell 2 million+, and it looks like it will, and the best of the best - Killzone 2, God of War III, Uncharted 2, Metal Gear Solid 4, Assassin's Creed II, Red Dead Redemption, GTAIV, Gears 2, etc. - still sell millions each, and make the developers and publishers money. I love this. I hope it never changes.
But as far as JRPGs go, you're right. It's so depressing to see them all turn into action/RPGs or WRPGs just because they had to kill turn-based. :(
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 8/19/2010 11:02:18 PM
Snaaaake
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:00:45 PM
Victor321
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:03:30 PM
Highlander
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:04:25 PM
Your final paragraph...
"But as far as JRPGs go, you're right. It's so depressing to see them all turn into action/RPGs or WRPGs just because they had to kill turn-based."
Why did they "have to kill turn-based"? Why? I have heard no rational, logical or plausible explanation for that at all. I know we are not the developers so anything we say is pure conjecture, but have you ever wondered why they killed it? More specifically, why did it get killed on the home consoles, but not the hand held consoles?
I wish that we could have an interview with a good JRPG developer and ask them to explain why turn based has been essentially killed this generation.
@Snake,
You're right, but that way lies mediocrity.
Last edited by Highlander on 8/19/2010 11:09:44 PM
main_event05
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:32:53 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:39:26 PM
My basic point is in this particular generation, the games that really define genius and push the platform like Uncharted 2 did just aren't the massive success that the lesser games are. Look at how great, unique, and rarely addicting inFamous was, and it still can't touch some rehash like the Halo series in sales.
All of this, plus the fact that mediocre games are pushed by the media strictly because they remain 360 exclusive (Crackdown 2) has rendered this generation ass backwards in terms of rewarding hard working devs. Why make a great story and explorable world in an RPG when clearly what sells is having one direction to go and fast paced action? Why make a sequel look and perform better when you can reskin the whole thing and sell it again?
Why develop for both platforms when a cheap, crappy port will cost less?
You get the idea. Heavy Rain selling 2 million is awesome, but what hope do we have for the future when that kind of quality rakes in a great deal less money than some reskinned, rehashed, pop culture phenomenon?
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:12:26 AM
I know what you're saying about lesser titles (in comparison) being more popular, but perhaps what we have to worry about even more is the rise of casual gamers, who will buy anything they're told to buy and only watch advertisements instead of reading reviews. When gaming used to be all 90% hardcore avid gamers, most everyone who participated knew just about everything there was to know; they couldn't be fooled by ads (even if there were any on TV at the time).
This is the biggest problem, IMO.
Highlander: As I understand it, they will say the reason they used turn-based in the first place is because they didn't have the technology/processing power to produce real-time combat with the depth of a true RPG. Now that we do, there's no reason to be pausing stuff. That's the mentality.
Of course, I've never once bought into that, and I will always maintain that turn-based requires a level of strategy and thought that can (if it's deep enough) eclipse anything in the real-time realm. In truth, it was a lot like crossing strategy with regular fighting; we would think two, three, four moves in advance. Real-time is all about the "now" and the "in the moment"...which, as I'm sure you've noticed, is the motto this planet has adopted- instant gratification.
Plus, factor in the rise of the casuals and the twitchers, and the overall decline of patience and attention spans in the populace (perhaps especially amongst gamers), and maybe they're right. Maybe there is no room for turn-based anymore.
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:18:12 AM
Highlander
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:18:40 AM
"Plus, factor in the rise of the casuals and the twitchers, and the overall decline of patience and attention spans in the populace (perhaps especially amongst gamers), and maybe they're right. Maybe there is no room for turn-based anymore. "
If that is the case, then you and I are dinosaurs my friend.
@worlds,
When big games have budgets that put individual game projects among the world's bigger corporate units, you can bet that corporate thinking will take hold. Fortunately there are the indie developers who are developing for PSN, unfortunately I don't see any of them working for a couple of years to produce a turn based master-piece.
Perhaps the only thing to do is to let the game companies know that no matter the reasons for turn based being used in the first place, we as gamers do still want the old turn based system. They need to understand (and I agree with Ben on this) that even if the excuse about processing power is true, turn based brings a totally different dimension of strategy and planning. It's that dimension that we want back.
Last edited by Highlander on 8/20/2010 12:24:24 AM
Snaaaake
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:34:24 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:51:25 AM
Highlander
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:32:57 AM
coverton341
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 11:23:58 AM
I see what world is saying, in a way. The top selling games are great games, but not technology pushers. Technology pushing games are decent sellers, but if this kind of trend continues developers and publishers will be less inclined to push boundaries and more inclined to push units. Businesses follow the money after all. I do agree with Ben though in the fact that if AAA developers make games that sell decent then Sony will green light more games in those franchises and from those developers. Sony seems to care about the money, but also give an ear to what fans want. Sucker Punch also seems to give clout to fan voice. Just look at the old new Cole design.
On the issue with turn based going out the window, Ben makes a great point. I'm about to speak in generalities, don't shoot me. We seem to be in a new mentality where we have to have it right now. Fast food sales eclipse grocery store tickets, people get up at 4 am to grab their starbucks because they can't be arsed to make it at home, we Tivo because we can't sit through commercials, we can't take the time to go to blockbuster for a movie night in so we Netflix instant queue it, gimme gimme now now. More children are diagnosed with ADHD, ODD, and an assortment of other ailments which in a high number of cases is a misdiagnosis for "can't sit still" syndrome. Youtube videos. Ever notice how if you go to youtube and the video is ten minutes long, the general max for a youtube video, that you immediately sigh and click soomething else, or speed through it to find the key points? TEN MINUTES!
Okay, enough with the generalities, I know that most of us here aren't like that. This community seems to be a little more patient and a little older. Even the younger members here seem to have a level of maturity that is higher than most twitch and casual gamers. But, overall it seems we can't sit still and hence how well would a turn based RPG sell these days? I know I would buy one but I wouldn't play it often because as I age I somehow lose hours in the day. I know a lot of gamers our age don't have time to play lengthy games either and would just pass on it.
Wow, sorry, I didn't mean that to get so ranty and lengthy. I'm done. Back to hiding. Bye.
Highlander
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:13:50 PM
Great points. I have one though to add about what you're saying about finding time to play long games. I personally have purchased far more games in this generation than I ever did on my PS2 or PS1. Perhaps it's not so much that we have too much choice, and so we don't play long games through to the end unless they can be completed before we feel like we need to play something else to catch up? Personally I'd rather buy fewer games that have longer play times, but I bet that publishers wouldn't prefer that...
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:30:06 PM
Highlander
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 10:44:20 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:41:46 PM
Highlander
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:20:37 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:59:41 AM
telly
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:07:05 PM
gumbi
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:04:18 PM
Reply
Hint for SE; Give us another Legend Of Dragoon!!! Ive been waiting for over a decade. If SE were to announce that they'd immediately shoot back to the top of my list.
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:42:54 PM
aaronisbla
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:41:15 AM
gumbi
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 9:10:06 AM
aaronisbla
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:21:09 PM
Ayane
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:10:18 PM
Reply
Yeah I know, many among the PSXtreme community feel they've been let down by Square, how majorly disappointing they've become and what not.
But seriously...this is probably the one thing that makes PSXtreme feel like those hack websites that it despises.
Sorry Ben, but as professional as you've been all this time in my eyes, I think this is one of the cases where you let your personal tastes and feelings override your sense of objectivity in gaming journalism, and every so often, fan the similar flames among your readers.
tes37
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:19:43 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:44:41 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:16:51 AM
There's not even any hate involved in this piece. Maybe you should actually try reading what's there, or make some sort of point that relates to the content.
From now on, if people can't find a way to comment on the topic of an article, and only post to attack the site, the post will be deleted. It's technically off-topic. It's also annoying as hell.
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 8/20/2010 12:18:16 AM
shadowscorpio
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:27:50 AM
@Ayane
Psxextreme really doesn't have to cool it on anyone. This is a site with people are ACTUALLY PASSIONATE about everything related to gaming. All Ben did is offer a reaction to what how Square-enix has been this gen as apposed to previous generations. He displayed his personal views on the issue in a perfossional way and as World stated he IS NOT alone in this.
-Case and point.
You're right Ben it is annoying. And it wasn't even towards me.
kraygen
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:21:01 AM
Lawless SXE
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:44:30 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 10:34:28 AM
telly
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:15:32 PM
darxed
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:21:23 PM
shadowscorpio
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:34:07 PM
Yeah funny how the hardware is a thousand times better than the PSone days yet SE can't match the quality they produced back then. Its like limitations forced them to put heart, innovation, and creativity into making beloved games.
Now its all so easy to make a game 'look' good that they will rely on that for sales, along with the Final Fantasy name.
Thank you Naughty Dog, Santa Monica, and everyone- you know who you are.
No thank you Square-enix.
Last edited by shadowscorpio on 8/20/2010 12:35:15 PM
Jawknee
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:21:03 PM
Underdog15
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 @ 2:54:21 PM
Pretty soon, you're going to have to put in Bold size 18 font "EDITORIAL: " before every title that's an editorial... You might even have to put in a disclaimer or a description of what an editorial is before people read on... maybe a pop-up even...
Of course, that still won't solve the ppl that don't read anything but the title...
*sigh*
DazeOfWar
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:30:21 PM
Reply
I've actually been playing Wild ARMS more than XIII. Hopefully SE listens and does Versus right for all of us.
kraygen
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:22:47 AM
I'll have 1 and 2 from psn and I found 3 used for only $4. Altogether that will be about the longest lasting $15 dollars of awesome fun I've ever had.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:31:33 PM
If you haven't done the Suikoden series yet, I'd recommend that. The second best RPG franchise ever next to FF, IMO.
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 8/20/2010 2:32:06 PM
DazeOfWar
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 8:07:52 PM
I never played any of the others later in the series so hopefully Sony will release them all on PSN one day.
TheCrazyMerc
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:40:05 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:47:56 PM
Reply
I sincerely hope Persona 5 doesn't show up with a 360 sticker and shiny new action-based battle system. JRPGs are hurting my head from all the facepalming.
Snaaaake
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:28:20 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:03:32 AM
aaronisbla
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:54:19 AM
darxed
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:09:20 PM
Sol
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:49:44 PM
Reply
BTW I stopped looking specifically for Square titles after I played Unlimited Saga. For me that game was just too bad for words. Since, it has been directly Final Fantasy, or something I might catch wind of that shows promise... or both.
BikerSaint
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 11:59:16 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:13:31 AM
Highlander
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:36:30 AM
Hang on, as in lots of bouncy cleavage and occasional glimpses of white cotton panties? Not sure that would amount to more than fan service. Of course I guess it depends on the definition of sexual. Are we talking about actual nudity and what not, or are we talking about characters getting it on off screen (or with one foot on the floor and in separate beds like Hollywood in the 50s). I haven't seen a trailer yet.
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:14:42 AM
Sol
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:17:41 AM
In any case, I haven't lost my faith in them yet, though at this point I look to them for enjoyable games instead of downright GHs.
(GreatestHits)
Last edited by Sol on 8/20/2010 12:18:53 AM
tes37
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:33:00 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:04:31 AM
Highlander
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:38:50 AM
BikerSaint
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 12:27:02 AM
OK, took me a while to hunt it back down again, but here's the video.
The Persona like game is called "Cathrine" and although there's no real sex, it's implied that she's on top & you know what they're doing.
The first time I saw it it was only in Japanese and I thought some real weird stuff was going on.
It actually seemed while they were doing it, all he could thinking of doing, was getting it on with sheep instead.
But in the same video that's now been newly subtitled, it all becomes much clearer(either that or I have a latent hidden desire for a woolly time in the hay with a Baaaa-mate)LOL.
Yuk, I hate lamb!!!!
Anyway, first check out the non-subtiled one first & you'll see what I mean.
1. Japanese Debut Trailer
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/japanese-debut-catherine/703245
2. The same Catherine trailer, but now subtitled in English (thanks to a viewer)
http://www.gametrailers.com/user-movie/catherine-subtitled-trailer/348915
BikerSaint
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:09:44 AM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:13:19 AM
Sol
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:23:09 AM
... that I could've got a chance to beta test XIV. So sad the realizations that sometimes come to pass.
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:06:20 AM
johnld
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:15:30 AM
by the way, a new MAG beta for current game owners next week. new weapons,skill tree, 3 faction battles in one map. if you have a copy of mag, you're in. time to hop back into mag.
Underdog15
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 @ 2:56:53 PM
BikerSaint
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:00:30 AM
Reply
Highlander
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:37:57 AM
BikerSaint
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:28:18 AM
LOL, thanks a nice name for it, but I just call it CRS(Can't Remember Shite) syndrome.
Or it could be because I'm not into real RPG's & there's so many FF's, and spin-offs every which way out there, and I don't really know jack about them(I do Like that cute looking Vanilla though). LOL
just2skillf00l
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:33:54 AM
Reply
I won't say this is their last chance because I'm sure I'll end up repeating myself on a later date. I've come to the conclusion that I'm hurt. No matter how much I lie I won't be able to get over this pain until they make a title worthy of meeting their former glories.
I hope I won't have too wait long.
johnld
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:59:59 AM
Reply
I tried to play final fantasy XIII again today, you know, for gil farming. when i got into my first battle, against the adamantoise in eden, i could barely get through the battle without giving up. while i was in the middle of the battle, i was thinking "what the hell am i doing?" the whole time.
on a side note, i tried playing siphoh fiter because it was free from psn plus. i cant believe how bad the graphics look on the ps1 games. i know its old, but i guess ps3 exclusive spoiled me. i couldnt stand playing the game. also, how the hell did we use to play games like that without an analog stick. using the dpad was horrible until i found the analog option. even then it still sucked at controls. videogames really have come a long damn way.
kraygen
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:27:12 AM
Reply
I had hopes for it at first but as more and more info came out I just got more and more disappointed and angry.
So I refuse to have hope for versus. I highly doubt it will be what we want and so at least this way, if it turns out ok, at least I won't be let down.
Sol
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 3:10:47 AM
___________
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 3:22:14 AM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 4:06:23 AM
Reply
Also, it depends on your definition on what defines a generation. Because, according to other things I've heard you say, it would seem that FFXIII does indeed define this generation. The fast-paced, twitchy corridor action is pretty much what the PS3/360 generation is. It's a sad realisation. We can but hope that they don't continue to f*** it up and actually give us something that is truly turn-based, that is about exploration and evolution of character, as well as having an engrossing world and is capable of drawing us into the experience. Although, it is better to cater to the potential masses than the vocal minority.
Gods I'm in a bad mood today.
Peace.
Ultimadream
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 4:07:03 AM
Reply
The game is focusing on a world, i just hope that means the chartacters and story won't be slapped in the background, thats why i believe XIII was a good comeback, XII was just so f***ing tedious to playthrough the story just never adavanced. I enjoyed XIII as i have said countless times, i found it to be a thrilling adventure, well paced, fun characters, fair enough plot. but just because their were a lack of towns i was not offended. SO i was very happy with what S-E gave us and in my opinion it's still one of the best games this gen.
aaronisbla
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 5:49:19 AM
Ultimadream
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 4:15:27 PM
Jawknee
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 12:10:52 PM
I would call into question your taste in games but you saved yourself my listing Heavy Rain as one of your favorites. ;)
Last edited by Jawknee on 8/21/2010 12:13:50 PM
Gordo
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 5:35:40 AM
Reply
FFXIII had nice graphics and the combat was fun and had a bit of strategy but it was totally linear.
DAO has more choices in the first couple of hours than FFXIII has in the whole game. I can't remember making one decision in FFXIII that had any consequences...
I doubt I'd buy another JRPG anytime soon. Mass Effect 2 on PS3 is definately on my purchase list.
Square Enix. You've lost me as a fan.
Lawless SXE
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 6:19:34 AM
Peace.
Gordo
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 6:40:04 AM
Jawknee
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 12:13:00 PM
Lotusflow3r
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 8:12:15 AM
Reply
1st impressions are in for WKC2, it's apparently 50x better than the original and Famitsu (not that i care) rated it high with 8's and 9's.
Might be deemed off topic, but consider it my way of saying, in the menacing Tony Soprano way, "Enix is dead to me".
Check out this new town in WKC2 and god the music is golden era great!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GbahVVeJqs - Yeah, impossible in HD.....
Oh, your avatar gets a Knight too...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwwf-lysiAo
And don't forget The Another World RPG with studio Gibili! My golden era needs are satisfied.
Highlander
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 11:23:44 AM
coverton341
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 11:26:39 AM
shadowscorpio
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 12:50:34 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 3:07:55 PM
Jawknee
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 12:12:19 PM
FlyingKickPunch
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 3:13:50 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 10:36:07 AM
Squaresoft used to make greatness all the time, from Vagrant Story to Chrono Cross to Parasite Eve to even Einhander. Square-Enix? Maybe you can see where I'm going with this.
Jawknee
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:22:46 PM
We expect more from Squeenix. Ever since they decided that being in MS pocket was more important that making great games, they have gone down hill. Big time.
It's more then pathetic we are 4 plus years into this gen and we have one big budget game on the PS3 from them. Sony consoles gave Square the tools needed to become the industry leaders in developerment. It only took MS and the Xbox to strip that leadership away from Square.
Again. One.Freakin.Game.For.PS3.In.Four.Years.
PATHETIC!
Last edited by Jawknee on 8/20/2010 1:25:06 PM
aaronisbla
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 2:24:51 PM
shadowscorpio
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 12:28:14 AM
But as you said the FF series is supposed to be Square-enix's baby. When they release a Final Fantasy they CANNOT afford to screw around.
Last edited by shadowscorpio on 8/21/2010 12:28:40 AM
shadowscorpio
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 1:00:26 PM
I'm just hoping FF 13 was an attempted experiment that went wrong and they learn from it.
FF versus 13 is going to in fact be the thing that reafirms that FF13 is either their new direction or if some where in Square-enix there are still people that can give us a beloved game that fans will talk proudly about for a decade if not longer (FF7, FF8, FF10, FF Tactics, Chrono Trigger, Chrono Cross, Xenogears, Vagrant Story, etc.).
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 4:49:57 PM
AirplanePeanuts
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 4:32:59 PM
Reply
And I'll say it again, Squeenix is still making some great games in the same vein as their PSone stuff... except it's on the DS.
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 4:49:06 PM
Lotusflow3r
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 11:23:05 AM
AirplanePeanuts
Monday, August 23, 2010 @ 12:57:08 AM
@Lotusflow3r - Yes, Level 5 developed Dragon Quest IX (and VIII) but it was very much designed by the usual core Dragon Quest team, headed by Yuji Horii. I think Level 5 are incredibly talented technically, but when they design their own RPGs they actually bore the heck out of me (Rogue Galaxy was at the same time beautiful and yet amazingly cliched, dull, and crudely designed)
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 4:50:50 PM
Reply
FlyingKickPunch
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 3:10:27 PM
marcusfrommo
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 7:46:09 PM
Reply
Let's face it, the gow series is done on the ps3. Yes, there making one for the handheld, but not the ps3? Seriously? And lastly, would people be complaining about this ff13 if it was exclusive, if they sold the ff13 skinned consoles which included the game or collector's edition for 300 or 400 dollars, or sold there ff13 soda cans, or there ff13 soundtrack for very reasonable prices here? Maybe, maybe not.
Could you imagine if this was exclusive and it was advertised as often as metal gear solid was and had an almost worldwide release in the usa and japan?
I'm not going to wager, but i wouldn't be shocked in the least if xbox get there hands on ff13 versus, or ff agito (what's that by the way). Oh is anyone playing the ff14 beta? How is it?
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 10:40:49 PM
FlyingKickPunch
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 3:05:38 PM
And Agito is for PSP, so yeah, probably won't make it to Xbox.
PLEASE know what you're talking about before you make such acrimonious remarks. You look like a crazy person.
Last edited by FlyingKickPunch on 8/21/2010 3:08:47 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 8:25:39 PM
Reply
First of all, that's not even CLOSE to being right. Secondly, this isn't about graphics. It's about the game itself, which would've been sub-par in Final Fantasy land, whether it was an exclusive or not.
Falsate
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 12:57:22 AM
BigBoss4ever
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 3:46:46 AM
Reply
Last edited by BigBoss4ever on 8/21/2010 3:47:00 AM
FlyingKickPunch
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 3:02:02 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Saturday, August 21, 2010 @ 11:16:22 PM
Reply

Final Fantasy Versus XIII









Riku994
Reply
Thursday, August 19, 2010 @ 10:12:04 PM