Black Ops Military Advisor Defends Medal Of Honor

When the controversy first hit a few weeks ago, we reminded everyone that EA had tapped the U.S. Military to assist in making Medal of Honor, and if those who served and risked their lives aren't offended, than we really don't care what the political windbags say.

Thankfully, one of the military members who had a hand in helping with Call of Duty: Black Ops has stepped forward and illustrated that very point: according to GamerZines, military advisor Hank Keirsey dismissed all the controversy surrounding EA's shooter, saying he's sure the game has been done respectfully, and it will indeed honor the lives of those who served in the war on terror. Said Keirsey:

"To me, if the game (Medal of Honor) is done respectfully - as I'm sure it's going to be done because I know the guys over there doing it - I think it'll honour those who served in the campaign just like it did WWII. 'Oh, but they're playing Taliban in multiplayer'," he added. "Well, you played a Nazi in multiplayer - nobody got offended by that!"

Again, exactly our point. Time is really the culprit here; had all those WWII games came out in the late '40s, we would've had a very similar outcry from parents and politicians. Of course, with over 50 years between then and when the WWII shooters started to flood the games market, nobody did seem to care, did they? Nobody made a peep. But the war on terror is just too fresh for some people. In fact, Britain's defense secretary Liam Fox has asked for Medal of Honor to be banned, saying he was "disgusted and angry" with EA's "tasteless product." EA's simple reply to those who know little about games?

"...many popular video games allow players to assume the identity of enemies, including Nazis and terrorists."

This isn't difficult. We at PSXE maintain our stance on Medal of Honor; we'd ask the servicemen who volunteered to help with the game, and even others who didn't, if they had a problem with the content. If they did, we'd have a problem, too. If they didn't - and they don't seem to - than we're good to go. They are the ones who matter in this scenario...nobody else.

Related Game(s): Medal of Honor

Tags: medal of honor, moh, ea, medal of honor controversy

8/26/2010 10:21:56 AM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Comments (65 posts)

Toggle Scrolling | Reload Comments

LimitedVertigo
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 10:42:47 AM
Reply

There will always be a select few that have to find something to complain about. My dad was in Vietnam and he despises any movies or games dealing with that war.

You can't please everyone and as long as you're doing something for the right reasons than you shouldn't regret or restrict your product. I'm actually looking forward to this, looks like something fresh.

4 up, 0 down

Shams
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 1:12:25 PM

First off, welcome back.

"As long as your doing something for the right reasons..."

I think that's the question. When the reason is "just entertainment", rather than education or training, such as with a VR sim, than really, is it right?

To me, it's no surprise that a military guy, who's most likely on the activision payroll, is going to promote games about war. And it's no suprise to me, that those recruiting centers at the malls, will market themselves to young adults with video games.

And to me, it's no suprise, that there would be some vet coming back from war, traumatized, and readjusting, and disgusted not at just the insensitivity of the people and the culture at large, but unwillingness to even understand that war is indeed hell, and that they've gone through hell.

So I agree with Ben, that the soldiers (and the victims of war) are the only ones that matter. And I consider it asinine, that someone who is not one of these should go on to tell them, "no,they don't".

2 up, 0 down

Shams
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 1:23:03 PM

And frankly speaking, I don't care if they ban such games or not. I won't play them either way. One may fairly ask, "well, where do you stop?" What if people start banning anything with guns. I say there is pretty big difference between fighting fictitious alien enemies, and games designed to take place in real-life wars. But like I said, I don't care, if people can see the difference or not. They'll always be there, even if you ban this or that.

0 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 7:03:30 PM

Makes you think about the proposed Mosque at ground zero in NY. It may be legal but a little common sense should tell those involved that it's not a respectful idea.

2 up, 3 down

Shams
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 11:15:01 PM

Lol, LV is indeed back!

I fully agree (though I know the real reason why you brought that up).

However, if a church, or a synagogue, or a temple, or an atheist center, or a post office for that matter was made at that same location, there wouldn't be a public outcry, would there? Why? Because not everybody blames religion for what happened on that grievous day (even though there are some who do "there will always be a select few who have to find something to complain about").

In the same way, anyone who knows even the basic tenants of Islam ("To murder even one innocent HUMAN is as to kill all of mankind, and to save even one innocent HUMAN is to save all of mankind"), knows that what took place on that grievous calamity of a day was EVERYTHING against Islam, and those who orchestrated the plot, and those who were involved in that plot, and those who knew about it and allowed it to happen, are the greatest enemies to Islam and all of mankind.

Yet, since 9/11 Muslims in America, and everywhere, are blamed for what happened. Hate crimes are on the increase, but worse than that is the quiet, unspoken grudge and hazing that has become widespread, and has polarized and separated the people even more, posing as an obstacle from them getting to know each other.

So some self-identified Muslims have taken it upon themselves to stand in the public spotlight...so that they may present themselves openly for meeting about certain topics that most have been silent about.

I understand their need, though I don't agree with their method. See, if people do horrific things in the supposed name of Islam, then the media will focus on that, and the people will blame Muslims in general. But if Muslims speak out, and say this has nothing to do with our faith, and in fact, is everything against our faith, the media will not focus on that, and the people will ignore it. So this is the desperate attempt by some to stand out in the spotlight of the media, that has been ignoring them for so long. Though, I believe that method will not help them, in the same way that I have made myself open to YOU, but you have chosen instead to ignore that invitation and nurse a grudge.

3 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 11:22:16 PM

Shams,

You didn't need to reply with an entire page worth of rambling. You and I both agree on the issue and that should be good enough.

I simply brought it up as an example of the topic being discussed in regards to showing some level headed empathy and kindness.

Religion is the reason 9/11 happened, PERIOD.

Okay, lets get back to gaming.

Last edited by LimitedVertigo on 8/26/2010 11:24:03 PM

1 up, 3 down

Shams
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 12:23:09 AM

Right. Agree with you, and everything else is rambling. You allow yourself to say 9/11 is because of religion, but if someone responds to that, then it is off-topic.

LV, just about every comment you make is an attempt to point out the hypocrisy of others, or to belittle them. Yet, hypocrisy is the one thing you never escape from.

But, yeah, I agree, let's keep it game-related, and friendly if you can manage.

1 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 12:40:37 AM

Shams I have no problem with someone stating their opinion, as long as it's backed by logic based on facts and common sense. I just brought up a well known example to further the discussion and add some insight into the issue.

Me stating that 9/11 was a result of religion is just stating an obvious known FACT. If you choose to attempt to ramble towards some resolution that stares away from the real issues than so be it. Notice that I'm not attacking any particular faith.

0 up, 2 down

Shams
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 1:43:00 AM

Right, what you say is facts, and what others say that is in odds to that is mere rambling because you are logical, and are more scientifically-minded. Forget about me then. What about Sir Isaac Newton, or Einstein, or even Darwin for that matter? Go read about their beliefs. Perhaps, you find yourself more "scientifically minded" than them.

1 up, 0 down

Underdog15
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 9:03:00 AM

Just to elaborate on you two:

Religion itself is not to blame, but religious extremists who use religion as an excuse. Those in power have used religion as an excuse throughout all history. Now we see people using the Muslim faith to push propaganda, but I betcha most Muslims are very much against what they do. Similarly, those in power in the middle ages used Christianity as an excuse for war, but I guarantee most Christians were against that too!

1 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 2:08:00 PM

Actually Underdog religion is to blame. History is full of intolerance, hatred, and ignorance on the behalf of "religion", not just "extremists".

I take it the Crusades were on the part of "extremists" and the Armenian Genocide as well?

Shams,

I suggest you read some Richard Dawkins, it may help with your false sense of faith and denial to the atrocities committed around the world in the name of a god.

Last edited by LimitedVertigo on 8/27/2010 2:09:50 PM

0 up, 1 down

Shams
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 1:31:54 AM

The fact that you mention Richard Dawkins in response to the names i've mentioned speaks volumes. Anyways, I wonder how he would've replied to my point...

0 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 6:21:06 AM

He would surely laugh at you as I have since bringing up people I look up to that share the same opinion as me only gives me more ammunition in pointing out how foolish and childish your beliefs are.

The fact that you believe in a grown up Santa Claus and expect people to take you serious is appalling.

0 up, 0 down

Shams
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 3:17:43 PM

LV, Richard Dawkins would mock me, as you would. There is no question in that. But would Richard Dawkins mock Einstein, or Sir Isaac Newton, or Charles Dawin for not being scientifically minded, lacking IQ, intellectual honesty, or having childish beliefs?

And Richard Dawkins is no scientist. I can't even call him an intellectual. Watch him get stumped on a simple question asking him to explain the increase in genetic information according to natural selection/evolution. Watch him get wrecked by Jewish New Yorker-turned-Wahabi-extremist.

0 up, 0 down

Shams
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 3:54:00 PM

You accuse others of having childish beliefs, but your disbelief in what you can't see is no different than the ego-centricism of a baby.

But, we will indeed see who was right soon enough. We will both eventually die, and either you are right, in which case we return to nothing, and so we will be in the same boat. Or you are not right, and we will see who was decieved: me by my "Santa Claus" or you by your Richard Dawkins.

0 up, 0 down

Shams
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 4:07:13 PM

LV, I also find it strange that you point out the atrocities done in the supposed name of God, but conveniently neglect to mention the atrocities done in the name of no God...such as those perpetrated by Stalin, Polpot, and Hitler, and those done in the name of oil, or democracy.

0 up, 0 down

Underdog15
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 9:50:46 PM

Yeah, LV, I was referring to the Crusades when I mentioned Christianity was used as an excuse for was during the middle ages. People use religion as an excuse, but I'm positive the religion itself is not to blame... Especially faiths that preach on love and peace.

Heck, the whole reason Christianity got so much attention was the fact that it was the first extremely popular religion to preach on the importance of love. I'm pretty sure the muslim faith at it's core teaches about easing the suffering of others.

So yes. It is NOT the religions, but the ones manipulating it's core... called extremists... like the crusades...

0 up, 0 down

Highlander
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 10:43:39 AM
Reply

Great point at the end of the article Ben. I do think that people often think with their emotions and not their head - like Liam Fox.

3 up, 3 down

OhYessss
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 2:59:54 PM

twat.

0 up, 1 down

Underdog15
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 3:20:34 PM

As always with entertainment/media, I take on the theatre approach in line with my educational background.

I do feel that an accurate representation is necessary. A glorification of war would be bad. What I mean, is if it's solely about the spectacle, that's bad. But if it accurately shows you the psychological battles the soldiers face, it's good. I want a current war game like this to make me happy about when the fighting stops.

Take a movie/tv show like Band of Brothers. It certainly did not glorify the war. It was entertaining, and cool at times, sure! But it did and excellent job at accurately portraying events in a way that resonates with it's viewers. If MoH can do something similar by immersing us into it's story, then it has been a huge success.

1 up, 0 down

Shams
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 3:35:40 PM

I agree with your sentiments, Underdog. I just think games, especially those that are aimed at the super-massive market of shooter fans, are designed to be for multiplayer fun, first-and-foremost. That's why depictions, consequences,and horrors of war would never work with anything having a game-over/continue screen, and would be as likely as kids playing team death match in history class (along with the teacher).

0 up, 0 down

booze925
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 4:38:23 PM

hey u bum, u think fox is being anal about this game...
well look at this!
http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=LY4sLNxfeds&feature=player_embedded#at=147
at least fox got the title right!

1 up, 1 down

totozero18
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 5:56:48 PM

@Underdog

Couldn't find myself a better reference than Band Of Brothers, by the way and kinda off topic, is The Pacific any good?

Last edited by totozero18 on 8/26/2010 5:57:11 PM

0 up, 0 down

StangMan80
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 11:02:11 AM
Reply

I really don't see the problem here?
It is just a game, about war, there has always been games about war and games with bad guys you can play as whether it's a gangster or terrorist.

2 up, 0 down

Shams
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 3:02:44 PM

That's just it. Some people are upset that they are making "just a game" off of real life war and events, when war is not a game, but a traumatizing reality.

0 up, 0 down

Underdog15
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 3:21:29 PM

My mom has always said that when I was growing up about any war game, past or present. You'll run into this argument anytime a war game is discussed in a non-gaming forum.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 8/26/2010 3:22:07 PM

0 up, 0 down

ro kurorai
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 11:04:01 AM
Reply

EA have too great a reputation to lose to screw this game up.
I'm certain they did portray a soldier's life faithfully and all those politicians whining about stuff they don't know sh** about simply contribute to the game's marketing ^^

1 up, 0 down

BikerSaint
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 9:50:12 PM

ro kurorai,

Thumbs up on your post!

And I think EA & MOH did a damned fine job portraying a soldier's life both faithfully, and damned well totally realistically too, in their trailer here .....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8j6PAJ7DEc&feature=fvwk

0 up, 0 down

Hezzron
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 11:30:21 AM
Reply

This doesn't really bother me personally, but I can sympathize with those who are bothered by it.

Nazis aren't causing chaos anymore. The Taliban are. I feel for those who have lost loved ones at their hand. I would like to think that playing as the organization that has killed your friend or family member would be out of the question for most.

A fiction terrorist organization would have been less realistic, but perhaps a little more sensitive to people's feelings.

3 up, 0 down

THEVERDIN
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 8:33:23 PM

Maybe EA should take the Taliban out and put illegal aliens shooting cops and jumping fences, selling drugs, you name it. You think they would feel the same way then?

0 up, 0 down

spiderboi
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 12:19:39 PM
Reply

To the criticizers--it's a game. Get over it!

1 up, 1 down

spiderboi
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 12:21:05 PM

But yeah as Hezzron mentions, these villains are still active so that makes it a wee bit sensitive. But c'mon--it's a GAME! So long as we don't get to play as the villain as a story progression prerequisite then it's OK

1 up, 1 down

WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 12:58:23 PM
Reply

That's a very solid stance to take for PSXE. Now where's Six Days in Fallujah?

3 up, 0 down

Shams
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 3:04:32 PM

I heard after ball had been dropped, it is being picked up, again.

0 up, 0 down

booze925
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 5:21:06 PM

i heard it was interred in the same place that This is Vegas was buried.

0 up, 0 down

jaybiv
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 1:49:47 PM
Reply

bottom line is too many people want to pass their values onto others as if it's their world. no one has a monopoly on pain. just looking at the currrent war. had we been born on the other side of the world, i bet that we would not view the American military in the same light. instead of heros they would be invaders. some people just need to tend to their own gardens before planting seeds in other folks'.

1 up, 0 down

Underdog15
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 3:24:41 PM

"planting seeds in other folks"

hehehe....

Sorry about that. You do raise a good point. Anytime you try to address real world conflict, you're going to get headbutted by one side or the other. You need controversial media to keep it interesting... sometimes I hate it too, but ya... I consider it a necessary evil.

0 up, 0 down

totozero18
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 6:10:42 PM

@Jaybiv, that's right, it really depends on the place you were born.
Here in SouthAm people tends to be pretty neutral both sides have it's faults, some people sees war on terrorism as a holy war, for some it's just business, if you ask me it's an endless nonsense, and of course the whole thing blows up when one side tries to impose on the other.

@Underdog, it's a REALLY SAD necessary evil.

1 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 7:01:15 PM

Live in a country without basic freedoms and I doubt you'll truly be in favor of your local government without the ever present feeling of fear and terror.

1 up, 0 down

Shams
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 11:21:21 PM

Right, LV.... your simple and basic freedom to play MOH...Don't worry, you won't lose that.

0 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 11:23:14 PM

...or the basic freedom to walk down the street and be whoever I wish to be as long as it doesn't hurt someone else unlike you know where.

0 up, 0 down

Shams
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 12:27:46 AM

Don't worry. You won't lose that either.

0 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 12:41:08 AM

Never was in fear of losing it, I don't live in Iran.

1 up, 0 down

Shams
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 1:12:54 AM

I know, but your paranoid rants suggest that you do.

0 up, 1 down

LimitedVertigo
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 1:31:51 AM

Paranoid rants?

I post a couple sentences in direct relation to the previous person's post while you continue to post multiple paragraphs with little to no purpose.

If anyone is ranting it's most certainly you. Not to mention stalking my posts.

2 up, 0 down

Shams
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 1:44:46 AM

What was your purpose in bringing up Iran? Neither you nor I live there. Nor was it mentioned in the article.

0 up, 2 down

LimitedVertigo
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 2:09:06 PM

In direct reply to your idiotic response to my comment. As if suggesting that I felt in danger of losing my basic freedoms. I simply pointed out it was the exact opposite, then gave an example of a country where my basic freedoms would be minimal at best.

Are you that narrow minded?

0 up, 0 down

Shams
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 1:45:24 AM

Like I said, whether MOH gets banned in England or not, mentioning Iran and your endangered American, civil liberties just seems to be an excuse to bad mouth other cultures and people whom you know nothing about other than from what you gather from youtube, and the like. But that is only expected from you.

0 up, 0 down

LimitedVertigo
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 6:24:21 AM

Ah yes the typical blinded retort. Simply because I've never been to a certain country means any knowledge I have on it is from youtube or some other idiotic source.

So I'm wrong about Iran, eh? I'd love for you to prove me wrong but yet again we're in the same position where I point out something and you backtrack with zero evidence in your favor.

I guess in your world there are only a select few that can actually talk about the Moon with any reliable information.

0 up, 0 down

Shams
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 3:39:07 PM

LV, why should I prove to you how Iran is when I haven't even stated how Iran is, and when it is completely off-topic? You're not getting that. If the onus is on anyone, it is upon you. But I can say your comments are proof enough of your pettiness, prejudice, and hatred.

0 up, 0 down

Shams
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 4:15:52 PM

And for the record, you might as well have been talking about the moon. And if you had been talking about the moon in such personal terms, then I, too, would've questioned your intellectual-honesty, and even sanity.

0 up, 0 down

Underdog15
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 9:51:53 PM

wtf, guys... you aren't even arguing about anything substantial anymore..

1 up, 0 down

totozero18
Sunday, August 29, 2010 @ 2:18:17 PM

Underdog's right chill out people.

Both of you are blasting out paranoid rants out of nowhere you do realize that you typed in "Irak" "Social Liberties" "Freedom" now the FBI, NSA, CIA, YMCA, MSN & STARBUCKS are gonna filter everything we say in here!!!

1 up, 0 down

Snaaaake
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 7:07:33 PM
Reply

Playing as the Taliban is only in the multiplayer right?

Dude.......that's just their appearance, there's no story of playing as a Taliban.

They'd rather EA make it as US vs US?

1 up, 0 down

dveisalive
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 8:30:15 PM
Reply

Its just a virtual reality, we dont die in real life but are character that is emulated in the virtual one does. I mean they have the ESRB, it's parents faults if there kids play this game etc... Its just a game for crying out loud XD

0 up, 0 down

THEVERDIN
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 8:37:10 PM

Go peddle your wares some where else

0 up, 0 down

BikerSaint
Thursday, August 26, 2010 @ 9:58:19 PM
Reply

Stick to your guns on this game, MOH!

Now go grab & publish "6 Days in Fallujah, EA!

"EA Taking Medal of Honor Criticism in Stride"

http://www.thealistdaily.com/news/ea-taking-medal-of-honor-criticism-in-stride/

Last edited by BikerSaint on 8/26/2010 9:58:52 PM

0 up, 0 down

___________
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 3:53:24 AM
Reply

yes but Nazis did not go around bombing civilians now did they?
sure, they were seen as the evil in those days but they did not go killing thousands of innocent people deliberately.
theres a massive difference between the Nazis and the taliban.
i agree with him, if the people who participated in it are ok with it than who cares!?
but, that was just a really bad example to use!

0 up, 3 down

Underdog15
Friday, August 27, 2010 @ 9:08:30 AM

"sure, they were seen as the evil in those days but they did not go killing thousands of innocent people deliberately."

Are you kidding me? Read a book.

2 up, 0 down

totozero18
Sunday, August 29, 2010 @ 2:20:12 PM

Ever heard of the bombing on Eindhoven, Holland?

0 up, 0 down

Jawknee
Monday, August 30, 2010 @ 2:26:49 PM

How stupid can you be?! besides the 6 million Jews slaughtered there were 3 million non Jews kill in the Holocaust as well. Many of them Polish. All innocent people mind you. The Taliban are just as bad as the Nazi's, only it's religion that drives them while the Nazi's ideology was secular.

0 up, 0 down

BikerSaint
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 2:50:46 AM
Reply

_________________,

<<<<yes but Nazis did not go around bombing civilians now did they? sure, they were seen as the evil in those days but they did not go killing thousands of innocent people deliberately.>>>>>

WTF?
How about the non-stop V-2 rocket barrage's raining down on the civilian population of London???

How about the Holocaust, where 6 million Jews perished under the nazi's???

I guess they never taught world history classes in your school, Huh?

1 up, 0 down

Underdog15
Saturday, August 28, 2010 @ 9:54:27 PM

no kidding... Jeeze, even the freaking Chronicles of Narnia movie shows that happening... wasn't a bunch of that movie shot in your land? Or was that Lord of the Rings?

0 up, 0 down

tightbore5
Tuesday, August 31, 2010 @ 4:15:20 PM
Reply

I would definitely try Airsplat. I go to them for everything, and I think that they are seriously the best. If you are having trouble finding something, just email them, I email them all the time and they have never steered me wrong and have always answered. Check them out here:

http://www.airsplat.com/

0 up, 0 down

kernic
Wednesday, September 01, 2010 @ 2:31:39 PM
Reply

@tightbore5
I just starteed playing airsoft a few months ago. I just checked out that airsplat site, its pretty cool! i didnt know they have airsoft replicas of the same guns is use in COD. thanks!
^_^

0 up, 0 down

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories cheats	PSP
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas cheats	PS2
Castlevania: Curse of Darkness cheats	PS2
Resident Evil 3: Nemesis cheats	PS1
Need For Speed: Most Wanted cheats	PS2
Eragon cheats	PS2
Resident Evil: Outbreak cheats	PS2
MAG cheats	PS3
Dynasty Warriors Vol. 2 cheats	PSP
Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings cheats	PSP

Resident Evil: Revelations review	PS3
Metro: Last Light review	PS3
Zombie Tycoon II: Brainhov's Revenge review	PS3
Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon review	PS3
Star Trek: The Video Game review	PS3
Injustice: Gods Among Us review	PS3
Dead Island: Riptide review	PS3
Defiance review	PS3
Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2 review	PS3
Army of Two: The Devil's Cartel review	PS3

The Bureau: XCOM Declassified preview	PS3
Time and Eternity preview	PS3
Ride to Hell: Retribution preview	PS3
Call of Juarez: Gunslinger preview	PS3
Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon preview	PS3
Spartacus Legends preview	PS3
Payday 2 preview	PS3
DUST 514 preview	PS3
Dynasty Warriors 8 preview	PS3
Disgaea D2: A Brighter Darkness preview	PS3

Do you plan to buy a PlayStation Vita this year?
	Yes, I'll definitely get one in 2013.
	No, but I'll get one eventually.
	No, I have no intention of buying the Vita.
	No, I've already got one.

Playstation 3

Playstation 4

PSP

Playstation Vita

Playstation 2

Playstation

Other

PSX Extreme

Site Stats

Black Ops Military Advisor Defends Medal Of Honor

Comments (65 posts)

Leave a Comment

Latest Updates

Popular Cheats

Recent Reviews

Recent Previews

Popular Sections

Extras

Sponsor

Our Poll