Security Updates For PS3, Sony May Consider Serial Keys
We don't normally cover hacking and other issues - primarily because we don't believe in giving certain people any attention whatsoever - but this is sort of an FYI for everyone.
After the recent hacking and piracy problems, Sony has decided to take some security steps: first is the upcoming firmware update 3.56, which will include "a minor update that adds a security patch." Firmware update 3.55 was also a security patch of some kind. But something else may be looming on the horizon, as reported by TechEye; it's the as of yet unconfirmed report that Sony is looking into serial keys. In other words, they will ship unique serial keys with each game it ships, thereby causing a big hurdle for those who wish to steal their products. Unfortunately, this didn't work very long on the PC platform so we'll have to wait and see if Sony comes up with another plan of action.
Also, let's not forget that big publishers like EA and THQ now have the Online Pass program, where you have to enter a code - that is only available if you buy a game new - in order to play online. ...how many codes are we going to have to put in? Just to stop the rampant problem-causers? 'sigh' Whatever happened to just playing games?
Tags: ps3, playstation 3, ps3 security, ps3 update
1/26/2011 9:03:32 PM John Shepard
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (117 posts)
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:35:00 PM
thepill
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:37:41 PM
GuernicaReborn
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:56:22 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:27:23 PM
GuernicaReborn
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:53:54 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:13:32 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:27:50 PM
maxpontiac
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:55:02 AM
BikerSaint
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 9:06:07 PM
kevinater321
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:42:43 PM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:48:54 PM
In a way it'd be like any game you buy from PSN because it is activated on your system, and you can activate it multiple times.
Last edited by Highlander on 1/26/2011 9:50:43 PM
FatherSun
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:50:36 PM
NoSmokingBandit
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:50:39 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:59:20 PM
I bet they do that and more with the PSP2 and any PS4 that follows eventually.
@Bandit, I haven't figured that one out yet myself. Unless they put some kind of key-station in retail locations that is essentially a kiosk where you can enter your code and get an unlock file on a small USB stick or something like that. I can't see how else it'd work.
Something like DECE's UltraViolet (formerly digital locker) play anywhere DRM might work too.
Saffleur
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:03:45 PM
Seriously though, does it matter what they put in? We're all gonna go and play it anyway right? That's not saying we're sheeple but I'm not giving up something I know I've put a good chunk of money in to.
I'm not in a rush to get the update, PS Plus + automatic DL = win.
___________
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:30:22 AM
NoSmokingBandit
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 11:27:08 AM
Anti-piracy on PC games doesnt stop pirates, it just makes it a huge pain for people who actually bought the game. The same thing will happen with the ps3 if they follow the same model. A lot of people who bought Spore for PC had to use a crack because their legitimate serial for it wouldnt work due to the multiple levels of verification. Ubi made an AP system for Assassins Creed 2 on pc that required a connection to their server to play, even just the single player campaign. One day their servers went down and people who paid for the game couldnt play but pirates kept on playing without even knowing there was a problem.
Instead of screwing around on the customer side of things, just make a more secure console. It took pirates ton more time and effort to crack the ps3 open, and sony should be proud of that, but dont make it a pain in the ass for people who actually buy their games.
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 3:12:31 PM
Besides the latest firmware fixes the descryption code to use random numbers properly and they are using a new private key. The public keys have already been pulled from the firmware update, but the new private one has not been reversed yet (I'll say yet because you can't say it won't be). Plus I've read comments and reports on a number of sites that suggest Sony did something in the secure processing vault and that PSN will start performing more thorough authentication checks to detect compromised systems. It's believed that the messaging from PSN will be encrypted and authenticated so forging the replies will be nigh on impossible. Whether that's true or not, I don't know, but I have read it from two separate sources in the PS3 homebrew community. If that is the case then it means that if you don't have the official Sony firmware 3.56 or higher installed, your PS3 will not be able to access PSN when this is enabled. DNS tricks shouldn't do much to help whenever they decide to start using these deeper authentication procedures. It also means that Sony will have the means to detect and potentially ban compromised systems at will. One of the sources I read seemed to think that Sony can remotely initiate these checks at any time as long as your PS3 is connected. Like I've said before, you might not be able to prevent tampering forever, but you can make your system tamper evident.
sha4dowknight05
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:43:54 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:25:20 PM
frylock25
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:06:21 PM
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 9:40:14 AM
FatherSun
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:47:00 PM
Reply
Dam Security Researchers!
thepill
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:49:29 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:50:03 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:27:44 PM
NoSmokingBandit
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:49:24 PM
Reply
FatherSun
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:01:58 PM
NoSmokingBandit
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 11:22:13 AM
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:06:08 PM
So you will likely be able to assign the key to 3-5 different systems between you and friends. You would trust your PSN id on a friends PS3 to install a key. You wouldn't give it to some random guy over EBAY. They just want to prevent piracy, copying, and transfer of ownership. They don't want to limit how you, the purchaser, handle your copy.
Last edited by Underdog15 on 1/27/2011 12:07:21 PM
NoSmokingBandit
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 2:43:51 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-sale_doctrine
"Copyright, as the name suggests, is the right to copy a work of some form. If one resells or gives as a gift a book (or CD or DVD) that one has bought, a new copy has not been made, therefore it is legal under US copyright law."
Publishers have no right to dictate how i can or cannot sell something i own. If i want to sell my copy of a game they shouldnt charge the 2nd owner for a new key. If you think they should then you should probably start rallying against libraries. Can't have people reading books they didnt pay for, how will the authors survive :0
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 3:16:00 PM
Second, stop comparing physical goods to digital media. To people who understand this differentiated piece of law, you sound really silly. So these lame claims that it's the same as used cars, books, or dental floss, just brutally make it obvious that I'm again entering into an argument with someone that lacks the ability to understand the most basic concepts of law. And I will get nowhere, because you'll just argue based on information I've already explained is NOT legitimate... And around in circles we'll go... I'm a sucker too apparently...
They aren't the same, and modern law hasn't caught up yet to define the differences throughout the whole of copyright law. It's only written in parts. But enough to make both you and the publisher right. And rest assured, some day, your case will be wrong.
Third, while there are too many loopholes that make it impossible to stop you from reselling a game or playing a used copy, the law is so inefficient for both parties, that game publishers ALSO have enough holes to say they own the data and can charge for additional keys.
So while you continue pretending your type 2 morality gives you some sort of entitlement to declare who deserves the money for the production you now use (not own), which apparently is fine, eventually the publishers are going to have enough and do what you're so upset they're going to do.
And guess what?!?!
Used game buyer? They DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU!!!! Oh no!!! You aren't going to buy their games anymore?!?! Well, who gives a flying rats buttocks. You never got them any money in the first place!
So stop pretending like you making some vow to not buy their games ever again is going to make some sort of difference. Losing you from the modern game market isn't hurting any of the publishers. You're the only one missing out of the future of gaming.
Last edited by Underdog15 on 1/27/2011 3:18:57 PM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 3:53:29 PM
In the digital age, the used item doesn't deteriorate, and there is no disadvantage in owning the used copy because it's identical to the new one. This removes the balancing effect that physical deterioration has prompting people to buy new. So, doctrine of first sale doesn't necessarily apply. So far the copyright office has indicated that digital goods are not covered by the doctrine of first sale for these reasons.
Games fall into an odd area because they are sold as physical items but do not significantly deteriorate, because the content is digital. So discs are covered by the doctrine, but downloads are not.
Fane1024
Saturday, January 29, 2011 @ 2:46:46 PM
Slavery was the law of the land at one time.
The exception for digital goods (software) is ridiculous and should be repealed.
This coming from someone who rarely buys used games and almost never re-sells. I also have never rented a game nor swapped games with friends. I pay the developers for the games I play.
Last edited by Fane1024 on 1/29/2011 2:51:59 PM
Highlander
Monday, February 07, 2011 @ 10:13:31 AM
I realize that you may not catch this reply, but I do have to post it anyway. The doctrine of first sale cannot and will not apply to digital goods because digital goods remain perfect no matter how many times they are passed from consumer to consumer. Because every copy made during any transfer of a digital work is perfect. Consumers can take a copy of a digital work and sell the 'original' to someone else, keeping their copy. The copyright holder loses completely in that regard because unlike the books and records that physically deteriorate, there is no reason for anyone to buy new if they can buy a perfect copy from someone else for cheap.
Copyright laws exist to protect the creators of works and ensure that they are fairly paid for their work. In a digital age, allowing the doctrine of first sale on digital works utterly destroys the point of copyright in the first place. If you do not protect the rights of content creators to be paid for their effort, they will not make the effort.
Copyrights exist for a reason, and it's a compelling reason for anyone interested in artistic innovation in any media.
FatherSun
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:57:01 PM
Reply
Temjin001
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:58:06 PM
Reply
THe sad thing is, with a digital medium like this, it seems to be one of the only ways a company can protect itself from this form of loss
.
While I think the concept of marketing a digital and easily duplicable product is more of the fault of the business who chooses to try and protect itself only by intellectual property laws and stop-gap solutions to hackers, I also understand that I value the gaming entertainment we have today and I'm willing to play according to these economic rules to have access to evolving content going into the future. I would hate for gaming to de-evolve or reduce it's momentum due to massive piracy problems that erodes away at the bottom line and ultimately hurts the health of the industry.
Do the right thing for gaming. Pay for your games and support the industry that supports you with the kind of entertainment you want to play.
Deleted User
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:02:46 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:03:07 PM
DemonNeno
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:53:33 PM
Hackers simply enjoy the challenge as it tests their abilities. Unfortunately, hacks have to be somewhat clarified to seal their works legitimacy. What's more unfortunate are the douchebags who think this is an acceptable way of getting their game on..
If your so damn hell bent on stealing these games, rob the store instead of the honest community. Pussycats!
Last edited by DemonNeno on 1/26/2011 10:56:33 PM
FatherSun
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:55:14 PM
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 9:58:42 AM
Be glad you missed it. I'm pretty sure I was the only one that sided with Highlander. Anyone else that agreed didn't say anything and/or didn't say much.
It's not like it's some complicated issue. People just have this false sense of entitlement... that they deserve to buy things or pirate things in a way that hurts the industry.
Really, though, people just get upset when you challenge a particular stance on morality. For some reason, in it means a person has to say they may have been wrong or have been doing something illegal, they feel like their self worth will depreciate if they shed the former self and donne a new one. When, in fact, the best way to become a more worthwhile person is to constantly look for more ways of improving otherwise questionable behavior.
In this case, pirating, stealing, and buying used. All 3 take profits away from the publishers and developers. The only difference is that by buying used, you're a sucker for paying. Might as well have just stole or pirated it and saved some cash.
But lo... and behold... my and especially Highlanders predictions are beginning to flourish. Perhaps sooner rather than later thanks to pirates. Funny thing is, people will STILL defend their stance as if they've somehow achieved this otherworldly enlightenment of justice. It's as if these people think if they paid for it, it automatically becomes legit. Well... in fact no... you're just a sucker.
Next thing to happen? Used game stores will either begin to sell new only, or become novelty stores.
Deleted User
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:02:08 PM
Reply
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:30:32 AM
As for Gamefly, I think it will be just fine. Gamefly in fact goes a long way toward making piracy unnecessary and impractical. Which is not to say that the vast majority of PS3 gamers would resort to piracy even if this was not the case. They wouldn't. All hail the fanboys!
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 10:04:46 AM
So it wouldn't be beyond reason for them to provide rental serial keys that are temporary or limited game access. I'm not sure if or how they would do that, but I wouldn't rule out the possibility. It generates additional income for everyone.
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:28:50 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:30:32 PM
Reply
Beamboom
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:44:38 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:37:06 AM
spiderboi
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 1:38:29 AM
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 10:09:46 AM
I believe you'd only have to wait just a little longer. There is a point (and maybe Highlander or someone can clarify the amount of time) when the licensing wanes. I believe once production of a title is shut down permanently, they lose the right to license out the software. (And even that has a wait time... something like 3 or 6 months after the last print).
In other words, if you wanted to buy Super Mario Kart for your old SNES, you wouldn't be breaking any licensing laws. Same thing with something like FFX. I believe production was stopped on that a long time ago, so it is not illegal to buy it used.
I believe there are a large number of PS3 games no longer in print now, and are 100% legal to purchase and play used.
EDIT: And chances are, that you could buy a game on EBAY for $5 used and then just have to pay another $10 for the key on PSN. This would drive the cost of buying used down quite a huge bit, I'd imagine.
Last edited by Underdog15 on 1/27/2011 10:11:03 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 3:43:07 PM
Sadly Abandonware isn't quite as legal as that. The copyrights on a game last for many, many more years than any game ever remains in production. Music for example passes into the public domain 50 years after it's last copyright registration (that's in the UK). In the US I believe that the term is even longer.
In practice though, it's not worth the while of any publisher to go after people for old games that are out of print because the damages cause by the infringement are negligible and the product isn't available, so it's unlike that individuals would be pursued. Users of MAME for example are not under great threat, but web sites hosting ROM images are subject to - at very least - take down notices because of copyright infringement.
Some publishers have a more enlightened view. I have the original Grand Theft Auto on my PC because the folks that published it released it for free as it was old and out of print.
Personally, I think that if a game publisher stepped forward and said that on the 1st anniversary of a game's launch it will have it's retail price cut to $39.99, and then annual reductions of $10 the following two years to a base price of $19.99. Personally, I think this would help combat used game sales, and drive increased sales to consumers who are somewhat behind the curve.
LittleBigMidget
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:39:29 PM
Reply
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:40:03 AM
Case in point, the PSP is actually thriving in Japan. Why? Because the device actually has widespread appeal there. In the west the PSP never had the kind of mass market appeal, huge fan following, and large and growing market share that the PS3 now enjoys.
FatherSun
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:42:40 PM
Reply
Ben, I wish to thank you for creating this post. I agree with you that hackers should not get any publicity because this is their lifeblood but at the same time to me ignorance is not always bliss. The industry needs to send a serious message to those who break the law. It is clear cut to me. Some say that Sony is wrong for going after GEONOT! Why? He opened the door and distributed the key to protected information and he should be held accountable. As far as pirating is concerned that is the world we live in today. Once the ability is there it WILL happen. Whether we like it or not. The trick is to not let it happen in the first place.
Now, If I may. Was it not when the PS2 was hacked that sales began to skyrocket? Someone who was paying attention please clarify. I say this because it is funny how GEO first began his attempts to hack the PS3 then he resigned from the task. Now all of a sudden he is back in the limelight with this current predicament. Although he is not the one who cracked the code he is now the face of this vulnerability. I look at every angle and part of me wishes that this was an elaborate conspiracy by Sony to recover its former dominance. I will explain.
PS3 keys are found. The system is wide open. Sales skyrocket. The spotlight intensifies thousandfold. Naysayers unite and the competition points it pointy fingers stating that Sony PlayStation is finished. Then suddenly Sony magically reveals a secondary hidden security measure and locks down the console once again. Sony can then state that PlayStation is where you need to be if you wish to have a secure entertainment experience and that the company anticipates possible flaws beforehand and can and will take the necessary action to ensure the security to developers and consumers. Sony is triumphant.
Please excuse the fantasy. It is just upsetting that this discussing even exists in the first place. just as Ben stated, "Whatever happened to just playing games?".
Last edited by FatherSun on 1/26/2011 10:48:28 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:56:56 PM
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:24:22 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 10:51:00 PM
Reply
sha4dowknight05
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:03:56 PM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:14:10 PM
sha4dowknight05
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:25:51 PM
My question is, how come sony hasn't went directly to the source and shut them down? Like stop these usbs from even being made and distributed? It just doesn't make sense, to me how sony has known this for a long time now, and hasn't physically removed the source yet?
Highlander
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:31:46 PM
sha4dowknight05
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 11:31:51 PM
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 10:33:13 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:23:00 AM
Reply
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:29:06 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:30:01 AM
Beamboom
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:30:26 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:34:20 AM
OLED screen - ** 5-inches **
Twin analogs - micro-analog sticks(?)
Sixaxis motion sensing/control technology
front and rear cameras
touch pad on back
bigger screen
new game media
*Touch screen also*
...more as I can get it...
3G and WiFi
flash memory based.
It looks like a honking big PSP.
Gyrosensor
Available in the Holiday season 2011
They actually said PS3 quality graphics.
Launch games mentioned....
Hot Shots Golf
Killzone
Garvity Daze
LBP
Uncharted!!!
Resistance
Wipeout
something called Little Deviants
Hustle Kings
Smart as Broken (???)
Uncharted is being demo'd on the thing! The trackpad on the back can be used to control Drake in the game.
Last edited by Highlander on 1/27/2011 12:44:37 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:46:37 AM
They show a picture of the new PSP in someone's hands, it looks about the same size as the original PSP, but the screen is 5-inches now.
New PSP's design is called super-oval. It's more rounded than the original PSP.
The system doesn't appear to slide open (yet), and the controls are laid out roughly like a PSP except with a second analog mirroring the one on the left of the original PSP.
The rear touch panel is 5 inches on the diagonal - the same as the screen and it is set up so where you touch the panel is where you 'touch' the screen - 1-1 control so to speak.
The NGP (new PSP) looks a bit thinner than the original PSP, more like the current PSP-3000, but it's overall length and width are a bit larger.
New user interface called "Live Area".
Online friends information, tracking, in other words the kinds of things you expect now.
The screen resolution is 960x544 - exactly half the resolution (horizontal and vertical) of 1080p. So it has about 1/4 of the number of pixels of a full HD TV - actually it works out at about 200 pixels per inch, which isn't far off laser printing resolution.
Seems to have a tag mode, and can sense when other players are near by, and what they are playing. Nice for ad-hoc mobile gaming.
Still not enough hardware detail for me....Grrrr!
Last edited by Highlander on 1/27/2011 1:05:21 AM
Lawless SXE
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:50:10 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 1:09:03 AM
The NGP will play anything playable in PlayStation Suite, so PlayStation suite is a platform independent virtual environment that allows any Android to play, as long as it meets the minimum specs.
NGP (aka PSP2) will also have trophies - yay....
Downloadable PSP titles will work on the NGP.
Capcom, Koei, Konami, Sega, Epic and Activision all onstage at the conference - no doubt showing games and commitment.
Monster Hunter Portable 3rd - downloadable on NGP - being demo'd by Takeuchi-san from CapCom.
Apparently Takeuchi-san hasn't seen the game on a real unit before and is impressed by the visual quality and the feel/control of the analog sticks.
The analog stick in the NGP is a real analogy stick, it actually pivots instead of sliding. Much better feel and control.
Now they're showing Lost Planet running on the NGP. Seems like it's still being polished, but still looks good.
Capcom apparently has other games for NGP in the works.
Last edited by Highlander on 1/27/2011 1:17:56 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 1:37:33 AM
Metal Gear game (MGS4) that uses the same models as MGS4 on PS3.
Kojima says he's working on a game that can be played on PS3 and NGP, so you can take your game with you. This new game will be revealed at E3.
Dungeon Defenders, previously developed for PS3, moved to NGP in a very short time.
Last edited by Highlander on 1/27/2011 1:40:40 AM
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:43:00 AM
frylock25
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:32:43 AM
Reply
We're seeing NGP - dual analogs sticks, 5 inch OLED display, 3G and GPS, front and rear touchpads, electronic compass on 3 axes. Awesome iconography on the back.
pics will be on the blog shortly
the analog sticks are raised not like the psp
"the OLED boasts 4x the resolution of the current PSP"
There are cameras on both the front and rear of the device.
There will be physical media for games, a New Game Media, a flash memory-based card.
"We will also incorporate 3G networks and accessibility in addition to Wi-Fi"
"NGP will be released starting from the holiday season this year"
Last edited by frylock25 on 1/27/2011 12:36:08 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:37:03 AM
Highlander
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 1:07:03 AM
spiderboi
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 1:42:02 AM
22:48 Jeff Rubenstein, PlayStation.Blog: This colorful game features heavy use of the rear touch panel. HIs finger creates hills that move the characters along. Wednesday January 26, 2011 22:48 Jeff Rubenstein, PlayStation.Blog
22:49 Jeff Rubenstein, PlayStation.Blog: The touchscreen on the back is the same size as the OLED screen, so the location of your finger is mapped directly to the game screen. Wednesday January 26, 2011 22:49 Jeff Rubenstein, PlayStation.Blog
22:49 Jeff Rubenstein, PlayStation.Blog: Tapping the rear of the screen makes characters jump. Yoshida-san is showing multi-touch operation on the rear panel. Wednesday January 26, 2011 22:49 Jeff Rubenstein, PlayStation.Blog
22:50 Jeff Rubenstein, PlayStation.Blog: Using the front touch panel, he can move the camera around. He's using both touch panels at the same time to do complex moves.
Jeff Rubenstein, PlayStation.Blog: 3 words: Call of Duty
Wow, so we all know a lot will flock NGP (i'm assuming next generation PSP?)
Lawless SXE
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:45:16 AM
Reply
I don't give a damn if GeoHot claims that he never intended for his workaround to be used for piracy, because really, what else is hacking used for in most cases? I can understand his defiance and determination after Sony took so many measures to protect the system, but that doesn't make it right, not by a damn long shot. Worthless excuses for human beings. Hackers are little more.
Peace.
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:49:31 AM
He knew. And he didn't care. He's acting like he's some kind of patriot or something. But he's just a selfish, despicable troublemaker who doesn't care about anyone but himself and his own ego.
He deserves no mercy and no sympathy for any and all retribution that comes his way.
But of course we're all going to get by in spite of him. Every legitimate purchase we make can be seen as our way of flipping him the finger.
Last edited by Looking Glass on 1/27/2011 7:52:33 AM
LividFiction
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 1:02:18 AM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 5:15:35 AM
___________
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 2:14:57 AM
Reply
mehrab2603
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 2:21:14 AM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 3:55:13 AM
Fane1024
Saturday, January 29, 2011 @ 3:06:53 PM
Moreover, both of the buyers in my example probably wouldn't have bought the game at full price if there was no used market, so the publisher may actually have made a full-price sale that they otherwise would not have (though they might eventually have sold two copies at a reduced price).
The current pattern of games having strong sales at release with little "tail" is shaped by the used games market: not just the quick drop-off, but also the initial "surge".
Last edited by Fane1024 on 1/29/2011 3:11:19 PM
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:18:09 AM
Reply
And it's not just their products they are protecting. As gamers we depend on the industry for satisfaction. And we also know that piracy by nature is harmful to the industry, and therefore harmful to us. Pirates are nothing but despicable parasites trying to bleed us all dry. But the good news is that we vastly outnumber them. So they can gloat and troll all they want. In the end it won't matter. Even if they did win a battle (and that's still a somewhat large if as I think this article demonstrates), we will win the war.
Last edited by Looking Glass on 1/27/2011 7:20:20 AM
Dreno
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 8:13:53 AM
Reply
So my fiance picked me up two worlds 2 last night, so I was trying to sample it before hopping back on ac :brotherhood, that's when I had to dl the update....
Anyways to make a long story short I fell asleep before I could sample my new rpg. But it finally downloaded.
Deleted User
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 8:30:00 AM
Reply
Deleted User
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 10:21:19 AM
BikerSaint
Friday, January 28, 2011 @ 2:28:16 AM
BikerSaint
Friday, January 28, 2011 @ 5:36:36 AM
http://www.joystiq.com/2011/01/27/sonys-restraining-order-against-geohot-granted/
Everything's coming up Sony. First, the NGP is unveiled to a general chorus of *drool*. Now, PSX-Scene has revealed court documents showing that a district judge granted Sony's temporary restraining order against PS3 hacker George "geohot" Hotz.
Hotz is now barred from "offering to the public, creating, posting online, marketing, advertising, promoting, installing, distributing, providing, or otherwise trafficking" (phew) in any software or methods for circumventing the PS3's protection methods.
No longer can he "provide links from any website to any other website" relating to such matters, or publish any information obtained by hacking the PS3. And more to the point, he can no longer "engage in acts of circumvention of TPMS in the PS3 System to access, obtain, remove, or traffic in copyrighted works."
The court allowed this restraining order to go through despite jurisdiction issues (specifically, Hotz residing in a different state than Sony, and a different state from where the claim was filed), granting specific jurisdiction "because he purposefully directed his activities at the forum state" of California.
The judge ordered that all involved parties meet to set a hearing date regarding Sony's motion for an injunction - and Hotz's motion to dismiss on personal jurisdiction grounds - by February 1, 2011.
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 10:36:26 AM
Reply
ChronowerX_GT
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:24:02 PM
If serials mean you can't sell the games on or buy preowned then Sony can stick it where the sun don't shine. Us people who pay for the games shouldn't lose out because some people don't want to. I know Sony has to run a business but find another way that doesn't give the consumer a negative experience.
Underdog15
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 12:40:45 PM
And if you go through gamestop, it's even worse going through a giant corporation that doesn't develop anything for the industry.
Gamestop made $2 billion this year in USED sales alone.
That's $2 billion dollars that went to Gamestop instead of publishers and developers. Nevermind any other used sales outside of Gamestop with BestBuy, Amazon, Ebay, et al. And guess what? That hurts the industry.
I'm all for used game sales on titles no longer in print, but if a title is still being manufactured, I hope Used Game Sales perish. Gamestop will give me $30 for a new release used. Then they sell it for $55: only $5 cheaper than brand new.
Last edited by Underdog15 on 1/27/2011 12:43:23 PM
ChronowerX_GT
Thursday, January 27, 2011 @ 7:23:49 PM
You could apply your logic to anything else though. Are you saying nothing second hand should be bought? What about if I buy a used car. It isn't benefiting the manufacturer but should it be scrapped even though someone else wants it. If everything was throw away (which sadly it seems like it's getting) then the environment wouldn't last a second.
Fane1024
Saturday, January 29, 2011 @ 3:18:04 PM
Highlander
Friday, January 28, 2011 @ 2:45:59 AM
Eld
Friday, January 28, 2011 @ 5:30:56 PM
Also, I just read this http://www.gamespot.com/news/6294220.html?tag=latestheadlines%3Btitle%3B1
Of course it's a little too late, but still didn't think it would happen.
BikerSaint
Friday, January 28, 2011 @ 5:41:35 AM
Reply
Each month or so, DirecTV would send an update. 10 or 15 minutes later, the hacking community would update the software to work around the latest fixes. This was the status quo for almost two years. 'H' cards regularly sold on eBay for over $400.00. It was apparent that DirecTV had lost this battle, relegating DirecTV to hunting down Web sites that discussed their product and using their legal team to sue and intimidate them into submission.
"Four months ago, however, DirecTV began sending several updates at a time, breaking their pattern. While the hacking community was able to bypass these batches, they did not understand the reasoning behind them. Never before had DirecTV sent 4 and 5 updates at a time, yet alone send these batches every week. Many postulated they were simply trying to annoy the community into submission. The updates contained useless pieces of computer code that were then required to be present on the card in order to receive the transmission. The hacking community accommodated this in their software, applying these updates in their hacking software.
Not until the final batch of updates were sent through the stream did the hacking community understand DirecTV.
Like a final piece of a puzzle allowing the entire picture, the final updates made all the useless bits of computer code join into a dynamic program, existing on the card itself. This dynamic program changed the entire way the older technology worked. In a masterful, planned, and orchestrated manner, DirecTV had updated the old and ailing technology. The hacking community responded, but cautiously, understanding that this new ability for DirecTV to apply more advanced logic in the receiver was a dangerous new weapon. It was still possible to bypass the protections and receive the programming, but DirecTV had not pulled the trigger of this new weapon.
"Last Sunday night, at 8:30 pm est, DirecTV fired their new gun. One week before the Super Bowl, DirecTV launched a series of attacks against the hackers of their product. DirecTV sent programmatic code in the stream, using their new dynamic code ally, that hunted down hacked smart cards and destroyed them.
The IRC DirecTV channels overflowed with thousands of people who had lost the ability to watch their stolen TV. The hacking community by and large lost not only their ability to watch TV, but the cards themselves were likely permanently destroyed. Some estimate that in one evening, 100,000 smart cards were destroyed, removing 98% of the hacking communities' ability to steal their signal.
And to add a little extrapizzazz to their operation, DirecTV personally "signed" the anti-hacker attack. The first 8 computer bytes of all hacked cards were rewritten to read.....
....."GAME OVER".

See Full Image









thepill
Reply
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 @ 9:32:59 PM