Analysts: THQ Stock Drops Due To Homefront Scores
THQ had plenty of confidence in Kaos Studios' Homefront, but it seems investors aren't impressed with the critical reception.
These days, investors only want to side with the best of the best and according to review scores thus far, this new shooter doesn't cut it. THQ trading was down $1.25 (21% of its value) to $4.69 and analysts are blaming the unimpressive critic scores for the decline. The game currently holds a relatively low Metacritic rating of 72, although the PlayStation 3 version is doing a bit better at 76 (likely because there are less counted reviews for the PS3 version). Said Janco Partners analyst Mike Hickey:
"This score is a bit of a disaster for THQ and the share price today is reflecting that. The market is a quality-driven market, (and) you need at least a score of 80 and above on Metacritic to do well."
Homefront is the story of North Korea invading the US, and in the single-player campaign, we'll become a member of the America resistance as they fight the Korean People's Army. THQ has also provided players with dedicated servers for the online action. However, that being said, THQ has said they've been forced to expand those servers due to "demand," and add-on content can be expected.
You'll see our review soon. What are you expecting?
Related Game(s): Homefront
Tags: homefront, thq, thq stock, homefront reviews
3/15/2011 9:01:15 PM John Shepard
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Subscribe to John Shepard on Twitter
Comments (40 posts)
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 9:52:02 PM
Reply
PasteNuggs
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 10:12:02 PM
FATHASUN
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 1:22:15 AM
Temjin001
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 9:57:21 PM
Reply
Anyway, the game doesn't look like anything special. Perhaps these analysts didn't get the memo that gamers already chalked this "me too" game up to just another milker in a crowded market with superior competition.
Come on THQ hang in there, at least until Darksiders 2 comes out.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 9:59:52 PM
Temjin001
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 11:02:45 PM
___________
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 3:43:47 AM
PasteNuggs
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 10:01:18 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 10:07:20 PM
PasteNuggs
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 10:16:39 PM
BTW, I picked this up today so I may, just may do a user review, which would be my first,that is if I find the time.
MadPowerBomber
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 12:46:06 AM
MadPowerBomber
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 12:47:40 AM
BikerSaint
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 10:25:42 PM
Reply
Temjin001
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 11:14:39 PM
Reply
I get tired of reading really poor reviews, written by critics who seem to have their values all misplaced.
Basically, it just sucks to think that a bug multi-million dollar game's success could be contingent through the eyes of a select few of individuals that may have proved that they can write, but may not have proved that they can accurately critique a medium that may possibly contain content that exceeds their understanding or ability to even sense or recognize the whole of the product's assets. Wasn't GT5's review consensus a virtual product raping by many critics? Anyway, I'm not saying Homefront should've been rated higher, it just seems to me this media power held by critics is pretty heavy. I just hope we can always trust them.
Temjin001
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 11:38:01 PM
Maybe that's a way to break the critics power or influence over sales.
Think about this scenario.
All games for the PS5 are offered via a cloud PSN service.
Many games have a 1 hour free introductory sample. After that hour the service then asks if you'd like to pay $15 for about 1/4 more of the game's content etc etc. This way, all gamers are free to sample every game for free, and if the quality of the game entices the player they can then pay up for more content.
Isn't the reason why game's are so reliant on critic's scores because a gamer doesn't want to "waste" $60? It seems so many of us on here wait for a score and say, I'll wait to get it when it goes discount.
If all games were offered directly to the end-user so they can judge for themselves the quality we then wouldn't necessarily need a critic to direct our purchases because we could already decide for ourselves.
kraygen
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 11:18:41 PM
Reply
Do reviewers get drunk before they review shooters because they know nothing new is about to happen? Granted their are those slim few fps games that are different, but the majority deserves a 7-7.5.
This is the score I was expecting for homefront and I thought it sounded more interesting than most military shooter sp campaigns. So my interest in it has not changed one bit, as for THQ and their investors, they need to start paying attention. They shouldn't have expected homefront to sell 15 million copies just because cod does.
Temjin001
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 1:14:46 AM
Reply
that's right, I'm whining =p
FATHASUN
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 1:24:46 AM
Geobaldi
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 3:54:55 AM
Dancemachine55
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 1:31:28 AM
Reply
Sure, the graphics might not be on par with CoD and it might have an engine different to CoD, but CoD's graphics aren't THAT much better and CoD's engine, while good, cannot touch the wonders of Frostbite 2 nor the Uncharted 2 engine. Seriously, why do Black Ops (88/100) and MW2 (94/100) have higher scores when Homefront is similar but different enough to stand out a little? I smell a conspiracy.
The story of Homefront is certainly far more interesting than anything CoD has offered, and yet even though Modern Warfare 2 and Homefront have a very similar single player campaign runtime, Homefront has more points deducted for it!! Consistency, people, come on!!!
Now for the multiplayer. Killstreaks are in this game as well, but this game uses Battle Points as currency to buy better weapons and vehicles. CoD has no vehicles at all, and currency wasn't introduced til Black Ops!!
Now, if Homefront's controls were iffy or not tight enough, or if the AI didn't react to bullets and shots as well as CoD, I would understand the lower reviews, but no one has mentioned it!!! No one!!!
So, Homefront is considered a lesser game simply because it doesn't have Call of Duty on the cover, the campaign is a half hour shorter than MW2, and the graphics aren't as pretty looking. The multiplayer looks far more fun, the story in the campaign is far more interesting and it does nearly everything else almost as well as CoD!!!
I feel so sorry for THQ. They put so much hype and buzz behind what was meant to be a great game, but reviewers are too busy playing Call of Duty to notice. Can't wait for the day Activision finally hits saturation point for this franchise and it finally goes under. T'will be the day the folks at PSXExtreme rejoice as they enjoy their rounds of Killzone 3, Resistence 3 and Battlefield 3!!
Last edited by Dancemachine55 on 3/16/2011 1:39:16 AM
Dancemachine55
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 1:41:10 AM
PorkChopGamer
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 6:54:48 AM
That being said, I've only had a chance to play an hour of Homefront but I've enjoyed the hell out of it. Powerful stuff story-wise and gameplay is solid.
zabak74
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 8:11:09 AM
Excelsior1
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 3:01:21 AM
Reply
___________
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 3:45:18 AM
Reply
Geobaldi
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 3:57:00 AM
___________
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 8:58:13 AM
theres 7 missions, i cant see many finishing 7 missions in 5 hours.
especially if your playing on the higher difficulties it gets quite hard!
people have got to understand kaos studios are only a very small developer, considering that, considering they would of had 1/4th the budget crysis 2, KZ3 had, they have done quite well.
it most definetly needs to be longer, but from a no name developer it is certainly a valiant attempt.
reminds me allot like singularity, a good game but just needed more time in the oven.
DazeOfWar
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 6:30:24 AM
Reply
I did pick up Homefront and haven't had a chance to play it yet but 5hrs to me isn't bad if I really enjoy it. MOH had a short campaign but it was still good. Also from what I've heard from a couple friends is that the online for Homefront is really fun.
Vysey
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 3:39:45 PM
DazeOfWar
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 5:38:31 PM
SirLoin of Beef
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 8:50:31 AM
Reply
D1g1tal5torm
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 10:19:07 AM
Reply
Vysey
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 3:38:23 PM
Reply
I'm not too dependent on critics reviews because everyone has their own tastes and like many of you have said, just because it's not COD doesn't mean it's crap! After all since when has COD been the FPS that everything has to be judged by?
I don't comment often, even though I've had an account for over a year, I'll have to make more of an effort. I read all the articles though, good job guys. Best PS(insert console here) review site and without bias!
just2skillf00l
Wednesday, March 16, 2011 @ 8:39:19 PM
Reply
fucai
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 9:26:00 AM
Reply
welcome to our website:
w w w . L t t s y . c o m
50%off ca,ed hardy t-shirt$15 jeans,coach handbag$33,air max90,dunk,polo t-shirt$13,,lacoste t-shirt $13 air jordan for sale,l nba jersy for sale sale,$35,nfl nba jersy for sale
and so on..
if you like to order anything you like.
More details,
please just browse our website Quality is our Dignity;
Service is our Lift.
enjoy yourself.
thank you!!
w w w . L t t s y . c o m

Homefront










Jawknee
Reply
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 @ 9:35:16 PM