PS3 News: Doing Everything In Arkham City Will Take 25-30 Hours - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Doing Everything In Arkham City Will Take 25-30 Hours

Batman: Arkham City won't be here until October 18, but that doesn't mean we can't appreciate more details, right?

Rocksteady provides fans with more info at the UK Arkham City site, and they talk about length, side quests, and more. First and foremost, game director Sefton Hill says the story mode is "designed to be story-driven while remaining open-world," so it's kind of a blend. Secondly, the main plot will take about 12-15 hours to complete but for the record, that's "less than half the game." Thirdly, he mentions the Arkham City Missions:

"These tell the story of what happens when Gotham’s most notorious super villains are locked up together. These run concurrently to the main story and can be tackled whenever you find them in the city streets. Some of my favourite moments are in these missions, including tracking down a deranged serial killer, solving a murder mystery, forming an alliance with a one-time villain and confronting the Riddler as he attempts to prove once and for all he is better than Batman."

Sounds awesome. Then there are riddles to solve and secrets to locate, which should be like catnip for all the adventuring completionist types. See, the Riddler has "definitely raised his game" this time around, so it's not just about finding the secrets; nearly every "riddle" requires that you "use your gadgets in inventive and interesting ways." So what does all this mean?

Well, it means what he said above- if you want to rush right through, the length is 12-15 hours. If you actually want to do everything the game has to offer, it's more like 25-30 hours.

Related Game(s): Batman: Arkham City

Tags: batman arkham city, batman length, arkham city details

3/17/2011 9:19:04 AM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (47 posts)

Temjin001
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:36:26 AM
Reply

back in the day I rented both batman and infamous at the same time and tried both before i devoted my time. i was hooked on infamous and bats was left hanging. i haven't been able to go back to bats ever since =(

but anyhow this batman game looks pretty cool.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 7 down Disagree with this comment

slugga_status
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:59:40 AM

You've got to make time for Arkham Asylum man. It is the best Batman game ever made.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:52:42 AM

While I agree that it is the best batman game ever made, that really isn't saying much since most batman games suck horribly.

Arkham asylum uses the unreal engine and it's obvious when you play. It turned out to be an ok game compared to other ps3 games.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 6 down Disagree with this comment

slugga_status
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 12:29:02 PM

Arkham Asylum was more then just an ok game..Also it wasn't just the best Batman game ever made it's the Best Super Hero game made. I'm not sure what exactly about it made it just a "ok" game..just curious

Agree with this comment 8 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

FM23
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 3:02:03 PM

Batman AA wasn't an "OK" game...Batman AA in many minds including mine see Batman ahead of Infamous. If anything, their are only a few PS3 exclusives that crack my favorite games of all time. Outside of the MGS series, Uncharted series and maybe GOW, franchises like AC, Bioshock, Fallout, Mass Effect, and GTA have kept my attention forever. Even though PS3 exclusive have quality, they don't always satsify preference.

Batman AA is a great game and definitely one of my favorite games. Give it a chance

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 3:49:46 PM

Yes I know some people are so in love with batman they couldn't see the glaring flaws the game had.

I'm discussed it before and don't really see the need to go into again, but if someone thought that Batman AA was better than Infamous you are really delusional.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Lairfan
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 5:07:43 PM

Way to sh*t all over other peoples' opinions Kraygen. Geeze.

But anyways, I think its hard to compare Batman:AA and Infamous. One is an open-world non-comic-book superhero game, the other is a linear comic-book superhero game. But since both games had their fair share of technical issues, I'd say they're about equally great IMO.

Although since Batman:AC is gonna be open-world, it'll be a lot easier to compare the two. Let's just hope both I2 and Batman:AC are gonna be great.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 7:13:10 PM

Back tracking doesn't make a game open world. That being said, the game has great visuals (hardly any slow down, no screen-tearing, rich texture-work and detail, elaborate animations) great variety in gameplay (mallet, projectiles, traps, stealth, platforming, puzzles, and if it had the batmobile and batwing, it would've been AAA in my book), excellent production values and voice-acting. Only weakness was it's strength: Unreal engine. Batman controlled like a truck.

InFamous, on the other hand, is an open-world. However, if we were to compare them straight up as single-player video games, I'd say inFamous has an addictive quality to it, which Batman:AA doesn't, IMHO, most definitely having to do with controls and mobility.

I'm looking forward to Arkham City (especially if it has the batmobile and batwing in a true open-world). But my expectations from inFamous 2 are sky-high, and totally at a different level.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Temjin001
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 7:35:22 PM

btw guys, I wasn't trying to imply that I didn't think Batman was good when I tried it. I liked it, in fact. It's just once I started playing Infamous the game really sucked me in, don't know why. It just did. The control playability of the game is simply outstanding. The Sly Cooper stuff must've given Sucker Punch a lot of experience because Infamous controls so very very well.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:03:58 PM

Batman: AA was great but not inFamous great.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:53:03 PM

I hear ya, Sensei Temjin and Jawknee. My sentiments are identical. I was even going to mention Cole handled like a unscrupulous but diesel racoon, when I mentioned Batman handled like a truck.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 2:52:51 AM

no, batman begins is the best batman game!
AA was good, but it was far too repetitive and did not have many gadgets.
thats who batman is, without his million and one gadgets his nothing!
thats what id love to see rocksteady do after arkham city, do a HD remake of batman begins.
one of the very few video games based on a movie license which did not suck!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

slugga_status
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 8:12:01 AM

I really don't think you can actually compare Batman and InFamous. They're two completely different games...InFamous isn't really a super hero game. InFamous is more so compared with Prototype then Batman

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Excelsior1
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:41:45 AM
Reply

that translates from developer speak to 8 hrs for the main story.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 5 down Disagree with this comment

slugga_status
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:00:38 AM

Not too sure about that. This is a single player only game so it's completely feasible for this game to be 12-15 hours in length.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:53:23 AM

comes down to what difficulty setting you put it on really.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

slugga_status
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 12:29:52 PM

@Kraygen totally agree with that. To me, the harder the difficulty the better

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Teddie9
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 3:14:23 PM

If that was the case, then do the extra stuff :)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 3:50:56 PM

I think some people misunderstood what I was saying. Some people are saying the game will take only 8 hours and some are saying 15.

I'm saying if you play it on easy it'll probably only take you 8 hours, but if you play it on hard it'll probably take you 15.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ultimate_Balla
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:04:38 AM
Reply

Same thing was said about GOWIII, Slugga. I also have that estimate of 8hrs. @ least I won't be disappointed if i'm wrong :)

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

slugga_status
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 12:27:14 PM

I don't remember that being said about GoW III. Even so, I remember GoW III to be pretty long. If I remember correctly Arkham Asylum was longer then 8 hours..not sure though..been over a year so it's a little fuzzy

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 1:15:40 PM

The devs said GoWIII would take 22 hours... We all see how that worked out. Although B:AA took me about 12, so if this is shorter, considering the larger scope, I'll be very let down.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 7:18:49 PM

If I remember correctly, their later pre-release, E3 estimates were between GOW1 and GOW2. Shorter than the second, but longer than the first. In reality, I think it was closer to the first, if not shorter.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 7:25:04 PM

If they were indeed changes in the length estimates, I'm sure it had to do with the change of leadership during development. Corey Barlog handed over the reigns of leadership to Stig Asmussen (former art-lead, and level designer). Stig still did a tremendous job. He changed the focus from trying to make it be the be-all/end-all, to focusing on breathe-taking assets and visuals not before possible.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:04:44 PM

God of War III on chaos can take up to 22 hours. haha

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shams
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:55:29 PM

22 hours on Chaos mode means you're a pro. I think it took me about that long to beat Poseidon! I kid, I kid. Maybe half that long :S

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

slugga_status
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:05:10 AM
Reply

The more time needed to complete this game the better. I can't wait for this game. Especially seeing the new trailer..so can't wait..Glad to see Joker back...

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

maxpontiac
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:28:12 AM
Reply

25 to 30 hours to complete will be well appreciated in my book, and might warrant a purchase from me.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:54:50 AM
Reply

I'd be more excited if I actually believed that the sidequests were going to be interesting. In the first game they were more just annoying than anything else.

I hope they have changed them quite a bit like they are making it sound, because I really don't want to spend 15 hours looking for little green question marks behind destructible walls.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Lairfan
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 5:10:22 PM

For this game, "side quests" doesn't mean just the Riddler puzzles. He means real side quests, so I don't see how you don't think they'll be interesting given what they've told us.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 6:18:17 PM

As far as sidequests go, about all they've said is that the game will have them and they'll be better than Batman AA.

As for listening to what they've told us, read the article Ben posted just before this one about how developers lie about their games.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 12:30:53 PM
Reply

Woohoo!

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Lord carlos
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 12:43:07 PM
Reply

Nice
Arkham asylum was a pleasant surprise that turned out to be one the best games this gen so far.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

CrusaderForever
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 12:46:07 PM
Reply

D1P! Batman Arkham Asylum was GOTY material not just the best super hero game. It was a massive fan service. This will be a platinum effort for sure. I am predicting a tough plat. If you haven't played AA you are missing out. It's like a good book and will suck you in and not let go. (Blushing) I beat it on the Xbot way back before I fell head over heals for the PS3. May have to give AA a go some time this summer.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 1:20:57 PM
Reply

Good number. I always do like me a project that'll take up a bit of time. Not too much time though, else I fall behind.
Peace.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Minishmaru
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 1:23:08 PM
Reply

Bah, don't tell me about the game length. As long as I get to enjoy it i'll determine the length myself!

Agree with this comment 5 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

GuyverLT
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 1:27:21 PM
Reply

Can't wait to play it on my new "72"in HDTV this game is gonna be so awesome.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

CrusaderForever
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 2:11:52 PM

Nice!!! That sounds sweet! I have a 65 and it took me away from gaming on my PC. Everything is PS3 PS3 PS3 now! :)

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

PasteNuggs
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 5:23:31 PM

Well I'm jealous. I just have a 46". Still great though.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

GuyverLT
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 7:43:50 PM

@Paste2TheNuggs

Well look at it this way some people still aren't fortunate enough to buy an HDTV so consider yourself lucky that you have one no matter what size it is.


I plan on getting a sweet projector somewhere down the line as I've wanting one fro some time now.

Last edited by GuyverLT on 3/17/2011 7:44:25 PM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Danny007
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 2:36:26 PM
Reply

By the looks of the game so far, I don't think I'll be able to stop playing it.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

FM23
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 3:15:10 PM
Reply

Man I replayed Batman AA more than any other game outside of Demons Souls. I love Batman and I love what Rocksteady did with their game. If the new game is on the same lines as the last...then I will be impressed. This was already a day 1 purchase for me.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Lairfan
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 5:12:56 PM
Reply

Everything Rocksteady says about this game screams "twice as good as Arkham Asylum." Its one of the only multiplats I'm looking forward to this year tbh.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MadPowerBomber
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:47:13 PM
Reply

Yay, Batman! I'm very excited about this game on so many levels. I loved every minute of Arkham Asylum. It was the first licensed game that I thought held its own against other properties that are primarily from video games.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 2:54:08 AM
Reply

wish they would delve more into the story.
have not mentioned much about the characters either.
have not even mentioned what happens to the joker after his, well, unfortunate incident in AA.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

fucai
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 9:24:47 AM
Reply


welcome to our website:
w w w . L t t s y . c o m

50%off ca,ed hardy t-shirt$15 jeans,coach handbag$33,air max90,dunk,polo t-shirt$13,,lacoste t-shirt $13 air jordan for sale,l nba jersy for sale sale,$35,nfl nba jersy for sale
and so on..
if you like to order anything you like.
More details,
please just browse our website Quality is our Dignity;
Service is our Lift.
enjoy yourself.
thank you!!

w w w . L t t s y . c o m

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Sanji_Himura
Sunday, March 20, 2011 @ 8:03:12 AM
Reply

1. I'll admit that I am one of the very few that passed on AA due to the reputation that all of the batman games before it failed and failed hard, but I will not pass on AC.

2. This is to those who think that AA was a bad game compared to InFAMOUS. Get over yourself. You are deliberately saying that one game is better than the other because one was an exclusive(and first party to boot). News flash genus, despite what you may think, it is the third parties that provide the lifeblood of a console and right now, most of them, Like WB, are seeing that developing for multiple platforms is better for their bottom line because of the discrepancy of console popularity on a global scale.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Did Advanced Warfare save Call of Duty?
Yes, CoD is back on track!
Possibly; it was a positive step.
The jury's still out...
No, CoD is still doomed.

Previous Poll Results