PS3 News: Warner Bros. Secures Rights To UE3 Through 2014 - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Warner Bros. Secures Rights To UE3 Through 2014

Some developers have done very well with the Unreal Engine 3, you know.

Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment has announced a "long-term studio-wide license agreement with Epic Games to use the award-winning Unreal Engine 3." This software will be available for any design team working on a project set to be published by Warner, and the license is good through 2014. It will be the engine used for Batman: Arkham City (it was also used for Arkham Asylum), and NetherReealm Studios utilized it for the new Mortal Kombat. Said Samantha Ryan, Senior Vice President of Production and Development at Warner:

"Unreal Engine 3 is one of the leading development tools available for today's creative teams and it is a perfect fit for both NetherRealm and Rocksteady. Mortal Kombat and Batman: Arkham City use the engine's state-of-the-art capabilities to provide the important foundation in bringing gamers the experience they are looking for."

Epic boss Mark Rein added that he's "excited" to see Rocksteady and NetherRealm taking advantage of the UE3, and there's little doubt that both games currently look pretty damn good. Really, a lot of this just comes down to developer skill, don't you think?

Tags: warner bros, unreal engine 3 epic, mortal kombat, batman

3/17/2011 9:32:24 PM John Shepard

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (37 posts)

Temjin001
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:54:17 PM
Reply

For every UE3 license extended a Crytek employee cries "no!" =p

anyhow,
I do very much think it comes down to developer skills when it comes down to the end result of a product. Several of the best looking games on 360 are UE3 games. Granted, middleware can't quite hold up to the custom engineered stuff by those who program exclusively, so I'd take an exclusive over UE3 for visuals any day.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bonampak
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:56:41 PM
Reply

The engine will need to have constant updates if it wants to stay relevant until 2014.

CryEngine 3 will not make it so easy for them.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Victor321
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 9:59:46 PM

Same goes for Frostbite 2.0 despite the fact that it isn't a middleware engine...I think lol

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:03:04 PM

After Cryteks CryEngine showing with Crysis 2 on consoles, I wouldn't be so sure.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:10:02 PM

Crytek have somewhat failed again, showing that their 'skills' lay more in exploiting the latest doo-dads that GPU manufacturers put in their designs to pander to lazy game programmers, than it does in sound programming using the existing hardware.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:05:29 PM
Reply

Ugh...this engine is never going to go away is it? Well if devs can figure out how to make it work like in Mortal Kombat(looks and performs great)then I don't mind so much I guess. Just sick of the horrible performance that usually plague the PS3 when Unreal is used.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PasteNuggs
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:23:47 PM

I wonder if MK looks so good is because it's 2d and there is not a lot going on on screen at once.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:25:59 PM

I thought the same thing too.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PasteNuggs
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:37:24 PM

I think MK might be the game that pulls me back to Fighting games. I don't think I've owned one since Super Smash Bros 64.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 11:58:25 AM

Very much agree, but it still makes them look like muscle bound gorilla's.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PasteNuggs
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:12:49 PM
Reply

Why is this the only engine devs use. Isn't id softwares engine a middleware engine? That looks way better than a lot of UE3 games. Well that is from what I've seen of Rage, so I could be wrong.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:16:22 PM

Rage does look pretty great.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PasteNuggs
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:36:27 PM

I know. I'm pretty excited for it. I like me some post apocalyptic worlds.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:42:59 PM

I haven't found one I liked yet, didn't dig Fallout, found Borderlands meh, not interested in Brink but Rage certainly looks good. Only down side is that Carmack has gone on record saying they had to alter the game and take some stuff out because....wait for it...the 360 lacks proper storage. :(

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

PasteNuggs
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:48:29 PM

Haven't played Borderlands and I also did not dig Fallout. I really haven't found a game I like this gen with that setting.

And yes that is a bummer. Why does M$ charge for additional disks? Do they hate gamers that much?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:54:12 PM

I liked Borderlands presentation, it was the gameplay, stiff/generic animations and Unreal problems like screen tearing, texture loading and pop in that ruined it for me.

Don't know why they charge for them. My only guess is because it cost MS money to print additional discs or that they know they can get devs to give us less for $60. When Capcom released Lost Planet 2 they complained about the lack of disc space then ended up selling what they had to cut on PSN and LIVE. It's always been MS model to get you to pay extra for features that you should have already gotten. Example, my Vaio runs on Windows 7 and came with the latest MS Office installed, when I tried to use it, they wanted me to pay for a key to unlock it. Even though it's already on my computer.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

SvenMD
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:16:11 PM

Wait, did Jawknee say something about screen tearing?!?! ;)

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:25:08 PM

:)

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 2:50:00 AM

how can they use idtech 5 when its only in house?
only studios who are allowed to use it are zenimax studios thats it.
not to mention its still under development, such a new engine not even the just announced prey 2 will be using it!
would be nice to see what other devs could do with it, but sadly id dont seem like sharing.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 10:49:09 PM
Reply

Frankly, UE3 is just ok for sp games. When it comes to the online it's just so far and away outdated that 2014 sounds like a lifetime away. I mean have you played Bioshock 2 online? It's quaint, but the UE mp flaws are blaring. I think the thing needs to be rebuilt from the ground up.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SvenMD
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:20:10 PM
Reply

That's just not a good deal on WB's part. UE3 might have been good for the first week that it came out, but ever since then it's been outdated...hence all the updates.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

main_event05
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:42:05 PM
Reply

What does that mean? that only WB games will use the engine?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 12:17:04 AM

No, it just means that they will continue to use it as their de facto engine for all or most of their games until 2014.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

main_event05
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 12:46:38 AM

ohhhhhh, ok.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MadPowerBomber
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:53:07 PM
Reply

I don't mind the Unreal Engine all that much. My biggest issue with it -- which wasn't featured in Arkham Asylum all that much, and isn't in Mortal Kombat's demo at all -- was when the screen's camera moves around or a new character pops up and it's a featureless colored blob and slowly the details pop in. It was in Wolverine and War for Cybertron heavily, and it's even in the Ps3 version of Bulletstorm on numerous occasions -- and it's THEIR engine.

If they could fix that problem, I'd be all around fine with it. It's not the greatest graphics engine out there, but I don't think it's necessarily the worst either -- provided it's in the proper developers hands.

I do wish, however, more multiplat companies would try to license better engines, or some companies would license theirs out. One of my favorite engines this generation is MT Framework, used by Capcom. Say what you will about RE5's quality or lacktherof, I think the game looks amazing to this day.

Of course, if Naughty Dog licensed out their engine... I think the world might just stop and everyone's eyeballs would launch from their sockets to make sweet, passionate opti-love with the screens.

But that's just me.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

MadPowerBomber
Thursday, March 17, 2011 @ 11:56:00 PM

I also really love the fact that Mortal Kombat runs at 1080p. At least the demo. I dunno any other fighting game that runs at that resolution.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 12:17:48 AM

It's probably 720p upscaled to 1080p.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MadPowerBomber
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 2:11:14 AM

That's probably true. It doesn't look it, though.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 2:48:11 AM
Reply

oh lord, why are people still using this creaking pile of bolts!?
wish epic would just release UE4.
wish DICE would license out frostbite 2, that things making even in house first party engines look outdated!
watch out ND, DICE are after ya!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 2:49:34 AM
Reply

Just let Rocksteady make an FPS after Arkham City!!
Am I the only one in this world who enjoyed Urban Chaos Riot Response?!?!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 7:27:46 AM

Probably. ;)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ColTater
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 11:19:00 AM

I liked it on the original Xbox.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

maxpontiac
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 10:46:45 AM
Reply

Not a fan of the Unreal Engine as a whole. Looks good in certain situations, but everything feels so.. static.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 12:03:05 PM
Reply

Well this is the worst news of the year. Batman AA would have been a lot better if they had built their own engine, or used just about any engine besides UE3.

Using an engine made for fps in a 3rd person action game or any game other than fps is just dumb. This is engine is so old and has been at the bottom of the quality pile for so long, why do companies continue to utilize it?

Obviously because it's easy, it's old and easy. Companies that use this engine are like guys who go to a pick up bar and leave with the 48 year old lady dancing on the table.

All this announcement says to me is that all WB games coming out between now and 2014 won't have improved one bit. Guess I won't have to worry about spending my money on their games then.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

A2K78
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 4:46:28 PM
Reply

"After Cryteks CryEngine showing with Crysis 2 on consoles, I wouldn't be so sure."

wait, you're judging Cryek's technology on a scaled down port?

CryEngine 3 will not make it so easy for them.

dude, unlike UE3 the CryEngine 3 is said to be future-proofed e.g. scaleable for platforms that even don't exist now.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, March 18, 2011 @ 8:23:22 PM

Said to be future proof by the same liars who said Crysis 2 would be the "best looking console shooter ever", so...yea.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MadPowerBomber
Saturday, March 19, 2011 @ 10:08:21 AM

The only thing that's future proof is time.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Did Destiny live up to your expectations?
Yes it did and then some!
Not quite but it's still great.
No, it's only okay.
Not at all; it's a huge disappointment.

Previous Poll Results