PS3 News: Sony: No Need To Introduce A New PlayStation Right Now - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Sony: No Need To Introduce A New PlayStation Right Now

One might assume that with Nintendo revealing their new console at E3 this year, Microsoft and Sony would rush to introduce new hardware.

And we had heard that Sony was spending some research and development money on the next PlayStation iteration. But don't think Sony has any intention of rushing out a new system: Sony Worldwide Studios president Shuhei Yoshida told IGN that his company "[does] not feel the need to introduce a new PlayStation console at this time." There's a good chance that the PlayStation 4 won't be around for at least a few more years, which comes as good news to a great many gamers who are quite satisfied with Sony's current machine. Plus, with the NGP (the PSP's successor) arriving soon, we'll have enough new hardware on which to spend our hard-earned money, right? Such things are expensive.

We assume most of you are fine with letting Sony take their time.

Tags: ps4, playstation 4, sony, new playstation

6/5/2011 9:08:34 PM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (71 posts)

main_event05
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 9:43:52 PM
Reply

If it ain't broken, don't try to fix it. MS and Nintendo both need new consoles IMHO. ask me why if you really wanna know. to busy to explain :-p.

Agree with this comment 9 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:12:45 PM

Because they were limited, last-gen tech the second PS3 came out?

Agree with this comment 9 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

main_event05
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:12:36 PM

Pretty much. But my reasoning was that Nintendo made a seemingly sub-par on purpose because they wanted to attract casual gamers where as MS did it and thought they were gonna win a race with it.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

maxpontiac
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 8:53:19 AM

I agree. As far as I see it, the PS3 is the only console out there using the most current medium.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Fane1024
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 @ 8:03:41 PM

360 is (with one not-very-important exception) current-generation technology. That's a fact, like it or not. Launch systems were a little more outdated, but not where it really counts.

PS3 is maybe twice as powerful as the 360, but that isn't a generational difference.

You won't find anyone here who has more disdain for M$ than me, but facts are facts.

The Wii is 100% last-generation, though.


Last edited by Fane1024 on 6/7/2011 8:05:13 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 9:51:45 PM
Reply

It's good to hear that Sony isn't going to be in any kind of hurry with the PS4. I like the way they handle their business and don't seem to be intimidated by their competitors.

Nintendo's new console doesn't appear to have enough to successfully carry them into the next generation. It will help them get a share of the great games being developed here lately, but next gen they'll probably have a tough time keeping up. I have nothing against Nintendo, I just think they should beef up their new console a little more.

Agree with this comment 9 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:14:15 PM

I suspect they are hanging their hats on just being a little more advanced than the Wii and bringing their core games and gameplay into a slightly better looking form.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BikerSaint
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 9:59:25 PM
Reply

Great news, as the PS3 hasn't even come close to reaching it's stride towards true greatness yet.

Last edited by BikerSaint on 6/5/2011 10:01:41 PM

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:05:26 PM

PS3 has at least another year to run before reaching it's 'peak' and plateauing in terms of increasing graphical quality. I'd look to 2012 or 2013 (at the latest) for a PS3 announcement. MS will jump at the same time.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ZettaiSeigi
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:05:08 PM
Reply

Great to hear straight from Yoshida-san. I really see no immediate need for the PS4. It's too early for that! Other than achieving true 1080p graphics and full stereoscopic 3D implementation, I see nothing else that would personally appeal to me.

It would be funny if the PS3 would hold back the new MS and Ninty consoles, but I really don't see that happening.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Cpt_Geez
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:12:32 PM
Reply

I'm not ready for the PS4 either I'm still enjoying all the great ps3 exclusives. Like main event said if it ain't broke don't fix it.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:16:30 PM
Reply

Future-proofing works Those other guys are already kaput and holding things back so there's absolutely no reason for PS4 to exist yet. I have a strong suspicion that the multiplat developers who are begging for a new generation are actually just tired of DVD restrictions and such.

Agree with this comment 7 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kingjose
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:22:37 PM
Reply

Of course not they neeed to fix a lot of glitches with the ps3 and the graphics still haven't been pushed to its limits

Agree with this comment 0 up, 13 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:38:56 PM

Please change your picture. Not because of it's message but it's too damn big.

Agree with this comment 10 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:52:58 PM

Ben,

Please ban this guy, he's ignored your admin direction twice, and that image is just plain annoying.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 12:49:17 AM

The avatar is gone. We'll see what he does now.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Fane1024
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 @ 8:09:35 PM

You're assuming he read the warnings. I haven't seen him post twice on the same article.

I'm with LV...freedom of speech and all, but it's not my site.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:39:27 PM
Reply

Fine by me, NGP can hold me over for a while.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:41:38 PM

Don't you mean Velvita?

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:04:52 PM

LOL, I refuse to accept anything other than NGP or BFG.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

main_event05
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:15:04 PM

PEPPER JACK!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:25:52 PM

Let's call it the PS Colby...much sharper than the PS Velveeta.

Or perhaps the PS Gorgonzola? That would be a 'sharp' name.

;)

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

frylock25
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 2:01:13 PM

you guys are so cheesy ;) lol

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LittleBigMidget
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:42:43 PM
Reply

I can wait, but not forever. Still waiting on alot of great PS3 exclusives.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SayWord
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:50:47 PM
Reply

The ps3 will never die, just like my ps1 and ps2. :p

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

556pineapple
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 10:54:36 PM
Reply

I'm fine with the PS3 for a few more years. No need to rush anything out, especially since it will be dated that much sooner. Also, I thought I heard they attributed that extra R&D funding to the NGP. Of course, knowing Sony, that's probably just their excuse until they're ready to reveal the new console.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:03:55 PM
Reply

Based on the configuration announced for the WiiHD (or whatever you want to call it) the new Nintendo console will essentially catch up with Sony. Multi-core PowerPC design with fewer cores than Cell but about the same Floating point performance, and a GPU that can manage 1080p with ease. Obviously with the advantage of another 5 years of tech development they have more memory, but other than that it reads like a PS3, including BluRay, internal HDD, and a motion sensing controller. The screen in the controller is a nice gimmick, but since it contains no processor worth speaking of, the controller is only a controller with a screen, not a true hand held, so no taking the game with you....

All in all, it catches Nintendo up with Sony, plus pushing the Wii a little further. But it also goes to the point I've been making for years now. The max resolution is, and will be (for at least another decade) 1080p. That's what WiiHD will do. PS3 can manage it, and 360 can scale to it (and on a rare occasion a 360 game will attempt to render to it). But since most people either have a 720p/1080i screen, or are still in the market to upgrade to 1080p, we are still on the upward adoption slope of 1080p as the standard within the home. Heck, US TV only went fully digital in the last year, and broadcast TV doesn't manage 1080p yet. Son there's no reason at all for screens to do any better than 1080p for now, or any of the next decade.

So WiiHD will be fine at 1080p, and PS3 will not be at a great disadvantage with most games achieving 720p and some achieving 1080p (or something close to it). The big thing for the remainder of the first HD gaming generation will be game library and right now, that goes to PS3 and then 360 over the Wii.

Sony's PS3 really was built to be future proof-ish. It's lasted really well, already into it's fifth year and not yet showing signs of slowing down in terms of improving games. In 2005 when the PS3 was pre-announced at E3 (the actual launch announcement happened at E3 2006) the PS2 was showing signs of being at the end of it's upward path in terms of games. I don't honestly think we'll see that happen with PS3 until next year. So I agree with Sony and don't think we'll see the PS4 announced until 2012/2013.

Last edited by Highlander on 6/5/2011 11:06:40 PM

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:46:04 PM

Only issue is Highlander, regarding the differences in resolution specifically; whilst the PS3 can render to 720p and 1080p; what we have seen, is that in many cases, multi-platform games seem to render their resolutions at sub 720p. We have seen this many times before. Some of the better developers like Bioware, Codemasters, Dice are able to make engines that at least give you 720p, but we have seen sub 720p on quite a few games in the past.

The PS3 exclusive developers at least know how to optimise the tech to give us higher quality visuals all around. What we want in the future is for all developers to be able to render to 1080p 60fps with ease. We both agree, that theoretically anyway, PS4 should really be able to do this. We should not see the graphical glitches we still see today, like shadow mapping distortions and the like. We also hope a better non-cpu anti-aliasing system can be employed by the GPU, being powerful enough to handle most of what we throw at it.

Generally speaking I am expecting the PS4 to be at least twice or three times more powerful than the current generation of PS3 hardware. At that level native 1080p 60fps gaming should be a reality. 1080p stereoscopic 3D films and games should also be a reality without too much compromise on the processing requirements needed to make something spectacular with the hardware.

We do need an upgrade. I hope it doesn't take too long.

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 12:06:49 AM

I think you'll get an upgrade, but not for another 18-24 months.

I think that they will double (or more the available CPU, but the new generation of GPUs from both major makers are extremely powerful. I don't think we have to worry whether the next generation of PlayStation will hit 1080p - even in 3D. I think that is a foregone conclusion. The thing I was getting at is that although we are moving into the HD age, people still run games at SD resolutions. So it's still quite hard to differentiate the WiiHD vs the PS3, when in fact the PS3 can claim almost the same capabilities as the WiiHD will.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

godsman
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 7:08:26 AM

I doubt that we'll see 1080p and 60fps ever. Even if the PS3/PS4 are capable, the developers will use the extra power from the machine to add more details or polygons.

It's not until 720p and 30fps become unacceptable, will they finally make the jump to the next tier. I don't see 720p becoming obsolete.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 10:16:02 AM

Possibly Godsman, but the hardware will be capable of pushing games of the same quality we have today at 1080p60.

Personally, I want to see hardware capable of real-time raytracing at 720p or better. The visual quality of such games would be something special, even at the lower resolution. You might even be able to get away with 1080p30 with real time ray tracing because the quality of the visuals would be that much better.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 9:20:50 PM

Yes Highlander... games will probably look real then!

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:03:58 PM
Reply

I say Sony should keep the 8-core processor of the PS3, it's still more than what MS and Nintendo have planned for their next consoles.

Beef up the GPU and CPU RAM, improve communications between RAM and Processors, stick in a fancy new Nvidia 3D graphics card thats handles 3D through hardware, not software, and finally, upgrade blu-ray to support quad-layered discs (100 GB) and move at 4x speed. The PS3's 1x blu-ray drive and low GPU RAM has kinda held it back, meaning the core processors were more relied on, making development difficult for those who didn't know how.

I know Sony can fix it though. PS4 will be a powerhouse of a machine and be easier for developers to handle than the PS3 was at first. No need to rush Sony, my PS3 still surprises me with what it can do.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:08:09 PM

Sony should take either a cut down Power7 with a SPURS co-processor or twin PowerXcell8i Cell CPUs on the same chip. That combined with a next generation nVidia GPU will be a ridiculously powerful combination.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Clamedeus
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 3:45:20 AM

What ever happened to the 1TB disc? I'm guessing that's not coming out anytime soon? lol

Or is that still being developed on.

Last edited by Clamedeus on 6/6/2011 4:26:09 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 10:20:48 AM

Why would you need a 1TB optical disc?

1080p requires a single layer BluRay for a movie plus a few extras. You can fit a 1080p3D movie on a dual layer Bluray with a few extras. The newer higher capacity BluRays at 33GB per layer are more than sufficient for 1080p3D. Even switching up to 2160p resolution (which is approximately 8MP resolution and isn't happening anytime soon) you'd need about the capacity offered by the new high density BluRay with 6 layers - well within the specification. 1Tb is such incredible overkill for an optical media, it's just not needed. Heck, before then we'd have to find a decently inexpensive way of jamming 60 8MP frames down an HDMI cable per second. That's a *heck of a lot of data, not including the lossless Surround sound of course...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 10:20:48 AM

Why would you need a 1TB optical disc?

1080p requires a single layer BluRay for a movie plus a few extras. You can fit a 1080p3D movie on a dual layer Bluray with a few extras. The newer higher capacity BluRays at 33GB per layer are more than sufficient for 1080p3D. Even switching up to 2160p resolution (which is approximately 8MP resolution and isn't happening anytime soon) you'd need about the capacity offered by the new high density BluRay with 6 layers - well within the specification. 1Tb is such incredible overkill for an optical media, it's just not needed. Heck, before then we'd have to find a decently inexpensive way of jamming 60 8MP frames down an HDMI cable per second. That's a *heck of a lot of data, not including the lossless Surround sound of course...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Clamedeus
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 10:50:37 AM

I'm not saying we need it, but I heard that Sony was working on a 1TB disc awhile back and was wondering if anyone heard any news on it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LittleBigMidget
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:06:54 PM
Reply

A real GPU.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:26:27 PM

And it shall be called the Mario Synthesizer.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dreno
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:07:30 PM
Reply

I agree completely with the masses. I'm not ready for the ps4 yet. Although I'm certain it will be a briliant machine. The ps3 still has a decent length life imo.

Sony, just keep churning out amazing games until nintendo and xbox have their new consoles out, see what they got running in them, and THEN build the ps4. Take everything they got, and one-up them.

Make the ps4 completely crazy compared to them. But keep keeping up with the ps3 so it can rival their new consoles. Wouldn't that just irk them?

The ps3 rivaling the new nintendo and xbox. And then BOOM! Hit 'em with the ps4 in a couple years after their stuffs out and show them what sony is all about.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:09:48 PM

Great avatar.....Rinoa FTW!

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:47:52 PM

I am very ready for a PS4, but as it is a few years a way, I will be getting a gaming PC rig to complement my gaming for multi-platform games specifically. My PS3 will be primarily for Sony exclusives or non-pc games I may be interested in.

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dreno
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 12:32:28 AM

Thanks much highlander. But I can't take credit for it.

A person called sleep on one of my many game news apps called gameon made it for me.

They were just making sig's for anyone that wanted one.

And actually, your avi is what inspired me to get a cool one. I've always like your avatar since I first joined the psxe community. I'm sure you've had more, but I remember your avi when it didn't have aerith in it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 1:20:57 AM

Indeed, it started out with only KOS-MOS. When I can spare the time I will probably re-do the whole thing and change up the Shion and Aerith images plus add someone else...not sure, perhaps Rinoa?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

dmiitrie
Sunday, June 05, 2011 @ 11:52:25 PM
Reply

Thank god. Because of finances, I wasn't able to get a ps3 until last year and have since made only a little headway into the giant backlog of games I need to play. I doubt I'll be ready to upgrade my system for at least another 5 years.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 12:22:57 AM
Reply

What Sony should do is wait and deliver a more powerful but equal or similarly equal in price to Microsoft's console.

2013-2014 is a good time, no need to unveil anything this year.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

mindmurderer69
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 12:29:18 AM
Reply

Playstation should not even think of another console until MS catches up with the power of their console. if anything take it slow and do another excellent job, but until then they should focus on getting the a-holes that f'ed up my poor psn. nintendo on the other hand should focus more on handhelds and go the way of sega and develop move games with their experience of motion gaming...but seriously they should just think about becoming a multi plat dev.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

79transam
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 7:09:01 AM

Scarecrow I would argue that PC gaming is vastly superior to all other forms, when done properly. Ive always had a console but PC was my primary form of gaming. I moved to my 360 and then my ps3(still own and play both) because of how badly the PC MW2 version was screwed up. The PC is able to offer depth in terms of graphic and gameplay that consoles are not able to provide. Not to mention the community support games can get in terms of mods. Also the PC is really the only place to play flight and other sims such as IL2, KA50 Blackshark, and the Silent Hunter series. I am thinking now though that I might just refresh my PC and make it ready for BF3

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

A2K78
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 12:53:08 AM
Reply

"If it ain't broken, don't try to fix it. MS and Nintendo both need new consoles IMHO. ask me why if you really wanna know. to busy to explain"

Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo all need new consoles now because the PC have essentially made all three platforms outdated by a factor of 1 generation. What's even worst is the fact by the time the next plaforms out even those would be outdated at least by a factor 2 generation by the PC.

Now don't tell that the PS3 isn't outdated because not even it can run the original Crysis, especially at full settings.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 7 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 1:21:43 AM

When did running Crysis with all the bells and whistles become the benchmark of the generation?

Consoles will never plat keep-up with PCs, that's not the model. They leapfrog the PC, and then coast for a few years before leapfrogging again. That way you only invest every few years in a new platform, instead of with every generation of GPU.

Last edited by Highlander on 6/6/2011 1:22:54 AM

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 1:22:13 AM

PC gaming is inferior to console gaming in every single way except graphics (and even graphically they're only TECHNICALLY better in post-graphic filters like AA, and other effects).

Have you heard of how PC developers have to limit games because they need to meet low level specs for those with low end PCs? :)

Yeah, that's the very reason why PC games no matter how "good" they look are only slightly better looking than console games.

There are a few exceptions of course. But most PC games look better than console games only in the technicalities.

You will also never find a game like Infamous 2 on a PC.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

ZettaiSeigi
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 1:24:14 AM

The thing is, the consoles never had to align themselves with the PC. The PC would always have higher specs and would always be customizable, so to bring it into the equation is rather pointless. If PC gamers are annoyed that their games are getting gimped because the developers have to cater to the consoles, then blame it on the devs for not realizing the full potential of the PCs. The bad news for PC gamers is that the devs have to bring their games out on the consoles since that's where the money is at nowadays.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 8:23:40 AM

the witcher 2 says hello.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 9:23:50 PM

How can you say that Scarecrow when most multi-platform games that are released on both the 360 and PS3 are available for the PC. The PC can also use console controllers through a mod.

I can get the same experience if not better.

What I like is the actual games Sony make exclusively for their platform. That is where the magic is... nothing else matters really.

It's all about the games...

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SmokeyPSD
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 1:43:11 AM
Reply

Honestly Nintendo doesn't need a response anymore from Micrsoft or Sony. They aren't even responding well to actual gamers. To non gamers yes but not people like me. I haven't felt like buying a product of theirs for many years now.

The only thing that would interest me is them becoming a 3rd party developer.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 3:28:04 AM
Reply

the PC gamer in me cries at the idea, im god dam sick of PC games constantly getting held back because of aging console hardware!
though besides that theres no need for new consoles.
ninty need one because they still have not entered the HD era, but for those who have theres plenty time left.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 7 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 10:36:41 AM

I haven't seen anything significant from PC games other than ever more complex and graphically sophisticated RTS games, Shooters and MMORPGs. Unless you're a hardcore RTS player, a shooter fan or hopeless World of Warcrack addict, there's not a lot on offer.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 10:36:42 AM

I haven't seen anything significant from PC games other than ever more complex and graphically sophisticated RTS games, Shooters and MMORPGs. Unless you're a hardcore RTS player, a shooter fan or hopeless World of Warcrack addict, there's not a lot on offer.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 @ 7:48:56 AM

oh yes there is, you just have to turn to the indie space.
PCs the ONLY platform where you can get survival horror games like amnesia, 2D platformers, any genre you want!
if anything its consoles that are genre specific.
the AAA blockbuster titles, the titles that you see in the limelight might be RTS, shooters because they were created on the PC!
does not mean thats all it has to offer though, i mean look at super meat boy!
if that was not so popular you really think it would of popped up on XBLA?
of course not, it would of stayed in the indie space and 99% of people would not know it ever existed!
thats the problem with the indie space, only the true PC gamers know it exists.
but its that exclusivity, that silence thats keeping it so good.
as soon as you open it up to everyone else the experience gets soured because 1 it gets toned down for the casual crowd, and 2 the more something sells the more its milked!
only limiting what can be done on PCs is aging console hardware, remove that and the skys the limit!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 @ 4:27:45 PM

Oh, the Indie scene...yeah, right, the software hippies that don't monetize their efforts....

No seriously, the PC has a more vibrant shareware scene because it has a shareware scene. Some would say that the reason fit this is that a lot of games that make it to console never make it to the PC, leaving a demand for other genre that no commercial software company will fill.

Still others may point out that Shareware and 2D platformers is exactly what got Doom and iD Software started. They may continue saying that PC gaming is a completely different animal from video gaming, and that anyone trying to claim otherwise has failed to understand the fundamental differences between the markets. Some may also point out that the majority of large game publishers are heavily involved in console gaming, some may also point out that the PC developers that have come to the console world a) make shooters or similar games, and b) have a hard time stepping out of their PC centric mindset.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Vivi_Gamer
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 4:03:24 AM
Reply

I'm happy with that I can still see at least 3-4 years left in the PS3, at least!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JPHarvey
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 8:02:04 AM
Reply

Most important aspect here is PRICE. It took years for the PS3 to be on top because of the price, it is doing well since the price drop. Why did the Wii do good at launch? PRICE. If the new Nintendo is more expensive then a PS3, guess what, it will not sell like the Wii did.

If PS4 is 2X or 3X in speed, it requires new technologies, new chips, more expensive ones. A new system at high price is the last thing Sony needs now. It is doing great with the PS3 and the incredible lineup of games, exclusives or not.

I bought my first PS3 at launch. 750$Can... plus a Hard Drive, plus a 150$ replacement, plus a second PS3 at 400$ with another Hard Drive, move controllers, etc... Guess what, I've enjoyed this generation because games are great and don't care if it's 720P or 1080P. It is HD and I will not pay another 750$ for a few more Ps.

No PS4 for me for at least 3 years. 10 years life for PS3 is what I was expecting from the start. If PS4 comes out before, too bad. I'll have to buy one!

Last edited by JPHarvey on 6/6/2011 8:04:59 AM

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 8:59:36 AM

I agree, price is the only...or rather the biggest thing that matters in the West.

ps4 MUST be equal or VERY close to equal in price as Microsoft's next console.

Then it will never be about the price and it then Sony can shove their exclusives in microsoft's face and bury them like they did to the first xbox.

ps3 already surpassed or is extremely close to surpassing the 360 in overall sales and that's with a huge price difference at the beginning of the generation. Imagine what it will be like for ps4 if the price is not a factor. Heh

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 10:40:18 AM

PS4 will be an evolution of the PS3. Many of the technologies that are in the PS3 will be in the PS4. The principle differences will be a newer CPU & GPU combination and more memory. Other than that, the rest of the unit is already in existence in some form. If the CPU is a development of an existing Power 7 or PowerXcell design it will be cheaper to design and easier to manufacture than the original Cell was by an order of magnitude. If Sony chooses a new nVidia chip that is more 'off the shelf, then once again it will be much less expensive. The price that the new Nintendo comes in at will be a good guide for the price the PS4 and whatever Microsoft come up with will have whenever they launch.

Scarecrow. Despite the sales in the US, I'm quite certain the PS3 has overtaken 360 globally in terms of unit sales. It already has a greater active installed base across the Globe.

Last edited by Highlander on 6/6/2011 10:41:27 AM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Fane1024
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 @ 8:29:08 PM

High,

Will the first batch of PS4 chips be cost-effective to manufacture and sufficiently low in terms of heat production at current die processes (e.g., 45nm or whatever)? In other words, are they more powerful enough that die sizes need to shrink again before they are cheap enough for a $300 or so launch?


Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

vicious54
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 9:00:41 AM
Reply

Just keep the excellent games coming, maybe next year announce a PS4.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Robochic
Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 1:30:59 PM
Reply

Thanks Sony I am not ready for a new console yet, still enjoying the one I have :)

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

A2K78
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 @ 12:49:49 AM
Reply

"Most important aspect here is PRICE"

When it come to the next round of consoles(720, PS4) I don't expect them to come cheap because as I have said before, there is no way realisticall that these companies can continue to sell consoles at a massive loss.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

A2K78
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 @ 12:49:59 AM
Reply

"Most important aspect here is PRICE"

When it come to the next round of consoles(720, PS4) I don't expect them to come cheap because as I have said before, there is no way realisticall that these companies can continue to sell consoles at a massive loss.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 @ 4:28:43 PM

They can if the platform remains secure enough to drive game and accessory sales through the licensing models.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

What do you think of the Destiny beta?
It's awesome! Can't wait for September!
It's only good, but I'm having fun.
Eh, it's okay, but I expected more.
It sucks, period.

Previous Poll Results