PSXE Poll Update: PS4 Should Come In At $300 - $400
Well, price remains a definite stumbling block.
With all these rumors floating around about the PlayStation 4 - none of which are true, as far as we're concerned - we wanted to know how much you'd pay for Sony's next machine.
The majority said they'd shell out between $300 and $400, but a whole lot more said they wouldn't go any higher than $300, which might be concerning. After all, the PS3 emerged at the disagreeable $600 price. Of course, things didn't go so well at the start of the system's lifespan, and the high price was a definite detraction. Next time around, might Sony make their new PlayStation more accessible by releasing it with a decent price tag? There were a few of you who said you'd go over $600, but even so...
This week, we want to know what you think about Catherine. It has received a few great reviews in Japan and we're hoping for something refreshing and even tantalizing. Remember, though, this question isn't about the game's potential quality; it's just asking about your interest. Are you up for this horrific, erotic puzzler? Or is it just not your thing? Or might really high reviews change your mind?
Tags: ps4, playstation 4
7/17/2011 9:06:53 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (46 posts)
maxpontiac
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 9:05:31 AM
Dreno
Sunday, July 17, 2011 @ 10:13:56 PM
Reply
The catherine demo is sick. I've only done the 1st dream, but so far I'm diggin the hell outta it. I'm gonna get more into tomorrow on my day off. But I'm thinkin already its a must buy.
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, July 17, 2011 @ 10:19:32 PM
Reply
I dunno if I'll be getting Catherine day 1 but I will be getting it because the demo was great. It was top quality and very different from what you usually see, I just have to have it in my collection and can't wait to follow that story. I like how your text messages affect the story and stuff. I can see why even the evil forces at IGN had to give it a 9.
Highlander
Sunday, July 17, 2011 @ 10:45:59 PM
Cesar_ser_4
Sunday, July 17, 2011 @ 11:37:27 PM
Highlander
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 2:21:22 AM
If it will play every generation of PS games made PS1 - PS4 plus PSP and PS Minis and PlayStation Suite along with being a fully up to date BluRay specification, full 3D in 1080p, media card reader, over engineered cooling system and bundled Move components, then hey, why not. I'd pay $500 for that.
Cesar_ser_4
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 3:06:01 AM
Highlander
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:14:50 PM
With a PS4 containing considerably more computing power and GPU, there is no reason to include the PS2 hardware on the motherboard at all. That was done with the PS3 because there was no way to properly emulate the GS chip in the PS2 with the PS3 hardware - that should give you an idea of how capable the PS2 is. A PS4 may include sufficient computing power on the CPU to fully emulate both the EE and GS from the PS2. In that way it could manage it. I don't think we'll see the PS2 chipset included unless a single chip version with negligible cost and power requirements comes along, but even then perhaps not because it really adds to the complexity of the design.
BikerSaint
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 2:57:55 PM
Fane1024
Thursday, July 21, 2011 @ 4:50:22 AM
Deleted User
Sunday, July 17, 2011 @ 11:19:14 PM
Reply
I said $400-500 for a PS4 though I wonder if I'll be done with video gaming by the time it shows.
godsdream
Sunday, July 17, 2011 @ 11:39:20 PM
Reply
Though I'm certain this in not for everyone, I'm 100% sure this would leave at least a little mark in this gen. And what better to try it in PS3 to enjoy it the most!
Qubex
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:11:25 AM
Reply
There may not be such a huge rush as in previous iterations to get the machine. It may be evident that gamers of this current generation will hold onto their PS3's for longer, purchasing cheaper games to fill up their back catalogue; and rather wait a further 2 years - say 2016/17 before entering the PS4 fray.
We have read countless times that this community wants the PS3 to last longer and too enjoy their investment for a greater amount of time. If this is the case PS4 sales would be steady but no necessary huge to begin with.
I mayself would rather hold back and see where the technology is heading. It won't take long for Sony to revise their hardware if they feel they got the release version wrong cost wise.
Saying that, Sony as a company could also have learnt a great many things from the PS3. They may be engineering the PS4 from the ground up to be "cost" efficient from the outset. In addition, expensive technology parts such as Blu-Ray player mechanisms and lenses are cheap. Other components have also come down in price.
Its been mentioned here before that the PS4 will be an evolution of the PS3. The architecture my change, more memory, faster Cell and a top of the line GPU, but, a lot of the ground work, operations infrastructure and PSN development has already taken place. We have helped subsidies this already; therefore it is only logical to think that PS4 should be competitively priced and yet still be in the order of 2 to 3 times more powerful than the current generation.
I think a $399 price tag is realistic for a PS4... but we will have to wait and see...
Q!
"play.experience.enjoy"
Cesar_ser_4
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:47:30 AM
Excelsior1
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 1:24:50 AM
Highlander
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 2:25:03 AM
I think the new system is likely to land at $399.99, but wouldn't be shocked to see it at $499.99 for a fully spec'd SKU.
Qubex
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 4:34:44 AM
Mr Q is speculating $399 - but then again, if there is a drastic change in architecture and "cutting edge" technologies that fulfill what Epic want to do at full 1080p 60fps as standard (and no less) - and in 3D as well, it could very well be more than $399...
But as far as I am concerned... I am gunning for that $399 price tag if Sony are going for more of a "middle of the ground" device - that will still have at least twice the bandwidth of the current console - but would not need a major major overhaul from an architectural perspective...
Q!
"play.experience.enjoy"
Last edited by Qubex on 7/18/2011 4:35:18 AM
Highlander
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:17:40 PM
Russell Burrows
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:24:38 AM
Reply
Highlander
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 2:30:42 AM
But you are unlikely to see the GPU on the same die as the CPU.
Another unlikely thing, actually nigh on impossible short of Sony being paid in dump trucks of cash direct from Redmond is an Xbox design based on the Cell processor. Cell is a joint effort from Sony, Toshiba and IBM. Sony and Toshiba have been back and forth with manufacturing and such on the Cell, but Sony now holds all the cards. I mentioned this because I recently read a speculative piece on a tech site speculating that the next Xbox would be based on a Cell processor design. I'll simply say, that's not going to happen short of S0ny making a billion dollar deal with MS.
Excelsior1
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:49:24 AM
Reply
as for catherine...i liked the demo, but i don't consider it a day 1p. it does have a lot the japanese charm that i have missed this gen. it is definitely on my radar.
Cesar_ser_4
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:55:57 AM
Excelsior1
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 1:11:38 AM
Lawless SXE
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 3:30:23 AM
StangMan80
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 1:19:01 AM
Reply
Improve games and make the PS Move a bigger deal and keep realeasing amazing titles but we need to IPs.
the PS3 has more, And I don't see the PS4 being great out of the gate with sales at all anyways. There's not enough PS3s out there yet.
Drop the price to $199 this Nov and keep dishing out those games. And put out some awesome deals for the Move. Plenty of bundles and stuff. that's what i want to see.
I would like to see the PS4 launch in the year of 2014. But it could come sooner, at a good price and if sony thinks it's good too launch in the year 2013. I don't see me getting the PS4 until '15, maybe evven '16.
StangMan80
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 1:21:44 AM
And for Catherine. It looks interesting, different. I still have to try out the Demo, I'll give it a spin when I get home next week.
Lawless SXE
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 1:55:11 AM
Reply
As for Catherine... that's easy.
Absolutely; it's a day one buy for me. Or it would be...
Highlander
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 2:32:35 AM
Lawless SXE
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 3:18:19 AM
I meant more of an online revolution, in perhaps pushing UGC as part of Home, or the core PSN. Perhaps an AR revolution, in which you'll be able to upload photographs onto the hard drive, which are then rendered as maps within games. Or how about taking the first steps into real time virtual reality interfaces? More realistic AI. Taking advantage of the Vita's unique capabilities to allow console gaming through the utilisation of the device as a specialised controller within certain games. I don't know. Something, some feature that will wow the masses, as the Wii did in this generation.
An iterational approach to the hardware, at this point in time, makes too much sense not to be done.
Excelsior1
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 6:52:42 AM
Highlander
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:21:26 PM
Lawless, I agree, I think that the specific hardware architecture is important only with regard to being capable of actually rendering at 1080p60 and 1080p in 3D backwards compatibility and PSN/Home compatibility. The specifics are less important because the video target is 'set' already.
___________
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 2:59:19 AM
Reply
id be surprised if it released under 500 bucks considering the inflated prices of tech these days, and not to mention the amount of money sonys lost with the ps3 they will want to start making a profit off its next console as soon as possible.
Lawless SXE
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 3:12:18 AM
___________
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 8:18:47 AM
VampDeLeon
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 8:21:00 AM
Reply
A2K78
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 8:49:28 AM
Reply
I think a $399 price tag is realistic for a PS4... but we will have to wait and see..."
Under this kind of scenerio, there is realistically no way economically that Sony can release a $399 console, that is unless they are planning to take a HUGE loss on a far grander scale thus bankrupting the company in the process. In fact to say Sony would release a console in such a price range would be like saying premium automakers like Ferrari, Bentley, or Maserati would release a luxury exotic in the $10,000 - 20,000 range. It aint going to happen.
Seriously though I think gamers need to be realistic and realize that the age of cheap consoles are over and simpily because these companies who have been undercutting themselves(e.g. Micorsoft and Sony) can't do it in the longrun because they can't afford to. In fact the retail price of the 360 and PS3 at launch reflect this.
Speaking of being realistic, I give nintendo alot of praise for actually being realistic about the Wii U price by declaring that it will not come cheap.
Excelsior1
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 9:28:50 AM
yes nintendo should get praise for saying it is not going to be cheap. i noticed they didn't tell people to get 2 jobs.
i want the most powerful console possible, and i am prepared to pay for it. having said that it is critical that sony gets the pricing right and watches ms closely. i think it also very important sony makes it easy to develope for so we don't just have a small number of devdopers who can really harness the power of the system. no more bad multiplats on a sony system.
Highlander
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:24:39 PM
I think you are both being far more pessimistic than is required, or realistic.
BikerSaint
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 3:21:16 PM
AcHiLLiA
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 12:43:17 PM
Reply
Last edited by AcHiLLiA on 7/18/2011 12:48:55 PM
BikerSaint
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 3:26:02 PM
Reply
Highbird
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 5:22:10 PM
Reply
Geobaldi
Monday, July 18, 2011 @ 7:11:49 PM
Reply
Fane1024
Thursday, July 21, 2011 @ 5:06:18 AM

See Full Image









Killa Tequilla
Reply
Sunday, July 17, 2011 @ 9:51:28 PM