Activision: Publishers Must Embrace Social Networking
Social networking is changing how we view the video game industry. Hell, social networking is changing everything.
And that's why Activision says programs like Call of Duty Elite are absolutely essential. The initiative officially launches alongside Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 on November 8; it's a free and premium service designed for avid fans of the franchise. It'll deliver more content and extras for those who wish to participate.
In a recent interview with MCV, Activision digital vice president Jamie Berger said that "year-round services strategy that broadens the game experience beyond just playing is going to be a necessity." He admits that it isn't critical for all publishers now, but it soon will be. Said Berger:
"Right now, it's an option, but in three to five years, it won't be. To support a diverse player base, you will have to have a services and ongoing content strategy. I don't see how games are going to manage without that…Elite is about Call of Duty being bigger than ever five years from now and laying the groundwork for that."
Other publishers are pursuing similar programs. Perhaps it makes sense to assume that gamers will be into digital communication of all kinds, but we at PSXE aren't so sure. In recent polls, we've determined that not everyone has a Facebook account, not everyone Tweets, and not everyone goes online to play video games. Maybe that's going to change, though; maybe the vast majority of gamers will eventually do all those things. And maybe that's why Berger says 3-5 years...
Tags: call of duty elite, activision, modern warfare 3, mw3
9/27/2011 8:37:35 PM John Shepard
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (24 posts)
PasteNuggs
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 @ 9:51:46 PM
PasteNuggs
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 @ 9:50:35 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 @ 10:02:58 PM
Reply
AcHiLLiA
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 12:17:34 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 12:46:27 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 8:47:26 AM
Oh, and don't forget the 10 or so other people that knew them in highschool also get involved on the 50+ commented on wall post... Those guys don't even live in the same province anymore. If facebook didn't exist, they would have still remained forgotten with one another.
As for me, I cut my friends list down from 500 to just under 50 about 3 months ago... because that almost 50 people (about 25 or so are family) are the only people I actually want to be in contact with. Screw the other 450 I'll never talk to again. (nor want to)
Social networking began as a professional networking tool... which is appropriate. This social networking is a giant wart on an already disheveled face.
AcHiLLiA
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 2:09:36 PM
Beamboom
Thursday, September 29, 2011 @ 1:26:59 AM
... But if you don't want that, in Facebook you just ignore them and put them off your list (if they ever were added), and hey presto you'll never see from them again.
Last edited by Beamboom on 9/29/2011 1:27:12 AM
Deleted User
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 @ 10:08:25 PM
Reply
Warrior Poet
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 @ 10:19:38 PM
Reply
Beamboom
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 4:09:57 AM
PoopsMcGee
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 1:39:42 AM
Reply
Beamboom
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 4:05:35 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 8:50:35 AM
That's not social networking. It's not even networking.
Networking, especially is the professional realm, involves having contacts and names. It's a way to know your resources.
This site is just news via one source and comments. It's lacking almost everything necessary to be considered networking. (Take it from a guy who once a week for the last 2 years runs a networking workshop)
Beamboom
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 8:55:54 AM
By your definition even twitter is not social networking cause the users are anonymous (or - can be)?
Many on my psn list are from here. We chat, argue, share stuff and get friends (and enemies) on this site. If this isn't social, and if it isn't networking, then what is. On a very basic level, sure, but still.
Last edited by Beamboom on 9/28/2011 9:04:16 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 11:12:35 AM
But it really isn't networking. Not really.
If it was just a page on Facebook, that's not necessarily networking either. Especially it the only thing in common is receiving information from one particular source. It may generate discussion, but it isn't networking because it's only comments and opinions.
Simply communicating isn't what networking is.
The definition of social networking is, admittedly, extremely loose in comparison to what actual networking is. Networking is meant to create contacts that contribute to each others cause. This site isn't a network of varying contributions, because the only service involved is Ben as the sole provider, and we only discuss what is brought up.
You could make an argument for this site being a social committee, as a committee is a group of individuals coming together over one particular issue.
But networking implies a vast number of reasons.
Sure you may network with some members by becoming PSN friends, sharing information, assisting each other on various goals in game, and more, but that's because you chose to network with them. It is not because this site is a networking site.
Does that kinda make sense?
Last edited by Underdog15 on 9/28/2011 11:29:20 AM
Beamboom
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 1:50:02 PM
But it's not just Ben contributing here, is it? Very often the topics are just as much set by community members than by Ben or any other writer?
Most every news articles Ben write I could have just as well gotten from almost any other gaming site. That's not why I return here every day!
It's the rest of the guys; you, World, High, Clam, Pontiac, Dance, Qbex, Lawless, Fane, Claire - oh christ I've started something I can't possibly manage to finish - Alien, Excel, OldOne, Biker - omg I am doomed to forget someone here - Kirou, Big, LV, Jawk, obviously mr underline, and newcomers like Warrior Poet, PSdode, Trophy, leatherface - ok I give up SORRY to those of you I should have mentioned here, it's too big a crowd. :D
Anyways... YOU guys are the main attraction here (plus a bunch I've forgotten to mention)!
Last edited by Beamboom on 9/28/2011 1:58:15 PM
___________
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 3:48:30 AM
Reply
TrophyHunter
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 8:47:11 AM
Reply
Underdog15
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 8:54:53 AM
Reply
Why does everything have to be social in gaming? Granted, I do enjoy connecting online with friends I haven't seen in months, or even years. Including the groomsman I had for my wedding. 2 of my groomsman live in the same city as me, but the other two, and 2 others I would consider extremely close, live thousands of kilometers away from me.
But -MOST- of the time... I game as a getaway. I counsel youth for a living... I volunteer for a couple things... I sit on committees... I play a couple sports...
I spend most of my life being social... when I get home and sit down in front of my tv with a controller in hand... the last thing I want to do is be social. It's the only part of my day besides sleeping when I get to be with my second favorite person.... me.
Darwin1967
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 12:06:07 PM
Reply
Underdog15
Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @ 12:24:58 PM

See Full Image









ZettaiSeigi
Reply
Tuesday, September 27, 2011 @ 9:44:57 PM