Gamers Rage: Mainstream Media Embarrasses Itself...Again
See Full ImageThe minute we think video games have taken a step towards legitimacy and acceptance, the mainstream media holds up its aging hand and with omnipotent authority, proclaims the industry's halt.
We can't get anywhere. The latest instance of this out-of-touch rationalization, where the media desperately attempts to find a scapegoat for society's biggest problems, comes from a CNN editorial by contributor William J. Bennett.
To explain away the decline of male ambition, Bennett decides to point a gnarled finger in the direction of video games. And while we're always open to intelligent, interesting debate considering the possible ills of interactive entertainment (check our chat with Dr. Bartholow concerning violence in games), this is poorly presented.
The subject matter isn't new, nor is it inaccurate. It's certainly true that women appear to be outstripping men these days. A fantastic article on the topic can be found in The Atlantic; one of this year's covers featured a disturbing title- "The End of Men?" It was a well-researched, well-written article - it's what The Atlantic does - and nowhere in that lengthy piece did I see an accusation that involved video games. Why? It's a gigantic issue and one that involves multiple elements in all stages and phases of society and how we develop.
See, I may have only been with newspapers for a couple years, and my degree is in psychology rather than journalism. In point of fact, my creative writing has always been better than my reporting; it's why I could never write for the New York Times. But if there's one thing I know, it's that you don't extrapolate and draw conclusions from statistics when you're entirely unfamiliar with the context. The only thing we can conclude from saying that 18-34-year-old men play more often than 12-17-year-old boys is just that: they play more (if it's even true). The rest is all assumption based on preconceived and false notions of the hobby.
CNN just lets this happen. It's amazing. The "fall of man" has nothing to do with changing roles in society? How we perceive "normalcy?" The rise of alternative lifestyles? The more liberal belief that the family is overrated and marriage is an antiquated notion? And last I checked, it takes two people to get married and have a family. How exactly does all the blame fall on the men's shoulders? So all the women want marriage and children, and all the men are ignoring them and sitting at home, playing video games? Might the woman's rise in the workforce contribute to their declining interest in marriage and kids?
Really, I'm not much of a journalist. But I'm fairly certain that these are the most important questions, and ones that require a great deal of attention and research to even begin to answer. But instead of even attempting that mammoth task, Bennett decides to bypass all the work and simply find a scapegoat. He locates a few statistics that really don't mean much, flat-out ignores other stats (like the fact that women are gaming more than ever; some studies claiming the gaming population is actually 50% female), and draws far-reaching conclusions with virtually no real foundation.
Yes, gaming and gaming journalism has a long way to go. But if that is the competition, we'll catch up faster than everyone thinks.
Tags: gaming, video games, gaming industry, gamers
10/5/2011 11:51:29 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (42 posts)
Highlander
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:22:03 PM
Regarding William J Bennett and his stupid and controversial statements...
Here's a quote;
Addressing a caller's suggestion that the "lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30 years" would be enough to preserve Social Security's solvency, radio host and former Reagan administration Secretary of Education Bill Bennett dismissed such "far-reaching, extensive extrapolations" by declaring that if "you wanted to reduce crime ... if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down." Bennett conceded that aborting all African-American babies "would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do," then added again, "but the crime rate would go down."
Here's the link;
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200509280006
That is all I needed to see to completely discount and ignore the man's comments on video games.
Last edited by Highlander on 10/5/2011 12:26:32 PM
5 up, 0 down
friction
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:41:46 PM
0 up, 0 down
Highlander
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:45:37 PM
Last edited by Highlander on 10/5/2011 12:47:00 PM
0 up, 0 down
Deathb4Dishonor
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:53:00 PM
3 up, 0 down
coverton341
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 1:01:41 PM
0 up, 0 down
Excelsior1
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 1:07:25 PM
maybe males would have more ambition if they knew it could lead somewhere. dare i say the american dream is over. the economy is not like it used to be.
3 up, 0 down
Highlander
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 1:18:02 PM
I know what you mean. Even after I checked the veracity of the comment, I hesitated to post it, juts in case. But as you say, there it is, plain as day...
0 up, 0 down
sawao_yamanaka
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 2:25:47 PM
0 up, 0 down
Gordo
Thursday, October 06, 2011 @ 5:14:24 PM
Though then again, aborting all white babies would reduce the crime levels as well...
Not good for the tax base though! You'd have thought a fiscal conservative might have known this!!!
Makes Stalin look all cuddly!
0 up, 0 down
Underdog15
Friday, October 07, 2011 @ 2:24:08 PM
lol, after I read your first line, I looked away from my screen and picked up my pitchfork.
Then I read your second line and said, "Oh... I get it now... False alarm everyone! False alarm!"
0 up, 0 down
slugga_status
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:33:18 PM
Reply
2 up, 0 down
friction
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:35:32 PM
Reply
I would expect to find his editorial on a network like fox, oppressing women with his stats which state men should be outdoing women because we are "better" and then to blame video games as the downfall.
I really thought I could count on cnn as they rarely take opposing political sides or views, but for them to still have this man employed who is CLEARLY not in touch with today's society is just a horrible move on their part, and alas I lose faith in another news organization...
1 up, 0 down
79transam
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:45:56 PM
Reply
1 up, 0 down
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:51:49 PM
Reply
2 up, 0 down
Highlander
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:59:04 PM
Last edited by Highlander on 10/5/2011 12:59:13 PM
3 up, 0 down
TrophyHunter
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 4:43:36 PM
You're talking in double sense right??
Last edited by TrophyHunter on 10/5/2011 4:43:47 PM
0 up, 0 down
FxTales
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 8:15:32 PM
This.
0 up, 0 down
Draguss
Thursday, October 06, 2011 @ 1:12:30 PM
1 up, 0 down
BigStack007
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 1:53:55 PM
Reply
2 up, 0 down
clockwyzebkny
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 2:04:00 PM
Reply
You took the words right out of my mouth. It's ridiculous how ignorant people make erroneous claims and try to pass it off as fact. How can you blame the decline of male ambition on video games? Ignorant idiots like this guy should realise that like writing or reading, gaming is a hobby, something you do on leisure time and in some cases - a job. It's a lifestyle for some. And while some people may become addicted to it like gambling, *ahem* for most, it's a way to pass the time.
I know many fellow male and female gamers and many of them are very ambitious. I'll be honest sometimes my career driven ambition prevents me from gaming as much as I want to but it doesn't just affect my gaming. It affects all the fun relaxing things I like to do like writing poetry and reading books. It's wrong to blame the gaming culture for the decline of male ambition. But it's an easy scapegoat.
2 up, 0 down
BIGRED15
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 2:58:17 PM
Reply
I'll have u know I'm an individual who has a secure job full time job, I go to college, and when I'm not gaming I'm furthering my skills to become an automotive/ graphic designer. I have skills people like this would kill for. This guy needs to pull his head out of his arse because no one is gonna give a damn a bout ur claims unless u can provide some kind of reasoning. Case in point I think this entire community proves this guy is entirely out of line.
2 up, 0 down
TheAgingHipster
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 3:15:26 PM
Reply
9 up, 0 down
TrophyHunter
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 4:45:30 PM
1 up, 0 down
Darwin1967
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 3:45:32 PM
Reply
1 up, 0 down
Russell Burrows
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 3:55:22 PM
Reply
One Up: Gamers Help Scientists Solve Molecular Puzzle That Could Lead To AIDS Vaccine
So, this isn’t exactly breaking news, but it’s so awesome that it’s worth sharing again in case you missed it. HIV/AIDS has killed some 25 million people worldwide and scientists have been working diligently since the virus was discovered in 1981 to find a cure. While a cure still eludes researchers, several protease inhibitors have been developed to slow its progress. But last week, HIV/AIDS research took a huge leap forward, thanks to the work of gamers. Yes, gamers.
About three years ago, a team of researchers at the University of Washington created a game called FoldIt to allow gamers to contribute to scientific research by playing with the shape and structure of proteins. Why proteins? Well, there are more than 100,000 kinds of protein in the human body, and understanding the structure and makeup of these proteins is key to understanding how they work and as well as to designing drugs that target them.
As proteins are found in the majority of diseases we suffer from, they are also key to developing cures, and so FoldIt enables gamers to design new proteins and fold known proteins into their most workable forms in an effort to contribute to disease prevention.
2 up, 0 down
Clamedeus
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 6:38:37 PM
0 up, 0 down
maxpontiac
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 5:51:53 PM
Reply
From personal experience, I will admit that when the recession affected me at the end of 2007, I was devastated. My entire investment portfolio, bank account and 20 years of hard work had evaporated.
During 2008-2009, and the early parts of 2010 I was depressed, and I turned to video games as an outlet to escape. Was I lacking motivation? Yes, of course I was, losing nearly everything can do that to a person. Was I not "being a man"? No. Now while I allowed myself to mope around, I was not failing in my responsibilities to my family. Could I have done more? Of course I could have, but sometimes life's bitter pills are tough to move past.
Now while 2011 was a prosperous year for me as compared to 2008-2010, the future of the housing industry where I am located looks grim. Based on what I learned over the past four years, I am better prepared as husband, father and man to handle the situation should things worsen.
It's rather disheartening to me to see someone such as William J. Bennett embark on crusade against men when his article shows little sympathy to those who have been so negatively influenced by their surroundings in the past few years. Do I believe some of what he said was true? Sure do. Plenty of men out there aren't doing what they are supposed to, but there is more to this story then a Playstation controller.
I believe Mr. Bennett had a golden opportunity with the chance he was given with this article, and needless to say, he dropped the ball.
2 up, 0 down
Snaaaake
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 5:59:50 PM
Reply
Sheesh, and as Highlander suggested, this guy has garnered some bad attentions to himself before.
Especially being a racist, givng racist comments and not feeling bad about it.
Sorry, even if this guy tells me something good, I'd rather ignore it.
0 up, 0 down
wenezz
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 9:28:48 PM
Reply
0 up, 0 down
johnld
Thursday, October 06, 2011 @ 1:03:56 AM
Reply
Last edited by johnld on 10/6/2011 1:05:23 AM
0 up, 0 down
Underdog15
Thursday, October 06, 2011 @ 1:01:36 PM
0 up, 0 down
Fane1024
Thursday, October 06, 2011 @ 1:36:45 AM
Reply
:P
0 up, 0 down
bissomitch
Thursday, October 06, 2011 @ 11:38:16 AM
Reply
Don't get me wrong, I don't agree with the author's premise nor his preaching, but to say the article is targeted especially against gamers simply because he mentions video games twice is reading more into it than is there.
The paragraph that starts off with, "For boys to become men, they need to be guided through advice, habit, instruction, example and correction. It is true in all ages." is pretty solid, in my opinion. Otherwise, the article is little more than a thinly-veiled attempt to preach marriage/family/religion, the so-called family values that must be protected from change at all costs.
Rubbish.
0 up, 4 down
Underdog15
Thursday, October 06, 2011 @ 12:59:23 PM
However, the article does list gaming as a major factor. And since this is a gaming site, which factor in the article do you suppose is most likely to be up for discussion?
0 up, 0 down
ChloeAngelCat
Thursday, October 06, 2011 @ 7:20:16 PM
Reply
To male gamers of all race don't mind William Bennet he doesn't have a clue to what he talking about...
0 up, 0 down
saintaqua
Friday, October 07, 2011 @ 11:13:18 AM
Reply
By the way, I do blame it more on the ideas that men have been under attack, made to look like stupid buffoons, etc. and the fact that there aren't a lot of real families.
Too many boys are raising themselves or are learning how to be "men" from the wrong sources
the anti sexism people are some of the most sexist people alive and have been trying to stamp out masculinity.
Last edited by saintaqua on 10/7/2011 11:17:56 AM
0 up, 0 down
PharaohJR
Friday, October 07, 2011 @ 6:44:14 PM
Reply
last year i did research about america males & females & i checked the statistics of marriage threw each era. in the 60s era marriage was at the highest for both white & blacks. 95% of white folks were married & 89% of blacks were these percentages also represented the number of families with both mother & father present. when the 70s came the percentages began declining & divorce rates increased. when u look at the events that took place in the 70s you will see in 1972 the official woman rights got passed..... now holon ladies im not blaming yal for the decline in family structure but we must acknowledge the truth.....
ya see.... in majority of females that define thereselves with feminin features yall posses the caring & loving characteristics that keep the household all happy & lovey dovey. us men that define ourselves with masculine features not walking all tough & etc but going out & making ends meet for our woman & being the discipline, strength etc has been something in our nature for the longest. when 1970 came about american females began entering the work force so this would be the last generation woman would depend on men & create financial indepenence. also in the 70s hard drugs such as cocaine & heroine came about which ended up in black folks communities all through ought the U.S.
the 60s & 70s era would be the last era of generation in U.S. that would pass principals & morals on to the next. fast forward today & you see the lifestyle of our youth & older folks that they choose... it takes a mother & father to raise a youngin & if either is lacked while growing the child will look for identification evrywhere not paying attention to the benefits & consequences.
i just thought i should share this since this post & previous touches on males today. gives you a aspect of why things are what it is today.
0 up, 0 down
Highlander
Reply
Wednesday, October 05, 2011 @ 12:20:15 PM
American conservative pundit, politician, and political theorist.
Apparently he likes to gamble a bit, despite his family values conservative point of view.
He's also responsible for some incredibly stupid and controversial statements...
Look him up, it's 'fun'.
Last edited by Highlander on 10/5/2011 12:22:35 PM