PS3 Previews: Call of Duty: World at War Preview

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Call of Duty: World at War Preview

More Game Info (Print This Article)

 

 

Scheduled release date:

November 2008

Publisher:

Activision

Developer:

Treyarch

Number Of Players:

1-2 Players (4 Online Co-op, 18 Online)

Genre:

FPS

Last year’s Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare took the gaming world by storm, and Infinity Ward reaped the rewards of a job well done. More than a few publications and industry sources handed over the Game of the Year nominations with gusto, and as of now, it remains one of the best titles of the new generation. But when fans learned the franchise would be returning to Treyarch, who would be bringing the series back to the traditional World War II setting, many questioned the move. After all, why return to an environment that never did as well as the modern warfare premise? Why give us another WWII shooter when the industry is already inundated with them? Well, you really shouldn’t jump to conclusions, for two very important reasons: 1. Treyarch is well aware of the raised bar, and what they’ll have to do to ultimately succeed with Call of Duty: World at War. 2. all early indications are that this new CoD title is mega-promising; the media thus far has shown us the best-looking World War II game to date.

Now, it’s gonna have to be all that and then some; Treyarch has even admitted they have to make “the best shooter possible” in order to retain all the fans gained by Modern Warfare. It’s a tough hill to climb, but we believe they’re most certainly on the right track. We’ve gathered up as many details as we can find thus far, and we start with the player heading out to battle the Japanese as a crewmember aboard the PBY Catalina. It’s a new mission recently unveiled by IGN, and in it, the player must use the onboard guns to tear a Japanese naval convoy below to pieces. You won’t automatically be placed in the position of gunner, either, because your commanding officers will direct you to the appropriate position in the plane, and you must respond as quickly as possible. The plane passes over a few times, giving you multiple chances to wreak as much havoc as those .50-caliber guns are capable of, and there won’t be much in the way of immediate danger. Just aim and destroy, action aficionados.

It’s going to be the diversity of this game that should appeal to just about anyone. Thing is, the days of simply hitting the ground running with a gun are dead and gone; we’re issuing in the age of the most involving and engaging first-person adventures in the history of games. In World at War, you’ll be faced with a wide variety of goals and obstacles; one minute you’re in the Catalina battling the Japanese, and the next, you’re battling the Germans as a Russian soldier. For those of you who don’t know, here’s a brief history lesson- many people understand the role the U.S. played in this war, but too many forget about Russia. The Germans were merciless in their attacks against Russians on their own turf, but at one point, the Red Army got sick and tired of getting pushed around. Far too many of their comrades were lost on the field of battle, and due to more allies joining the fight against Germany; Russia was able to take advantage and regroup. It’s at this point where you step into the shoes of a Russian infantryman, and there may be a bit of stealth mixed in with the standard FPS fare.

Remember, much of WWII was fought in hiding behind enemy lines, where elite groups of soldiers thwarted German plans by sabotaging supply routes and ambushing traveling units. In the demo Treyarch showed off to the press, you and a fellow soldier are working your way through a horrific aftermath. You take up some positions for sniping, but it isn’t long before the Germans acknowledge your presence and call in reinforcements, which completely changes your strategy (duh). The point Treyarch appears to be trying to make is a simple one: because we’re fighting two fronts in this particular game, because we have to switch between the war in the Pacific and the war in Europe, our experiences will change significantly. We won’t always be doing the same thing, and we also expect that facing the Japanese and the Germans will each present a unique set of challenges. The Japanese were fearless while the Germans were quite confident, and of course, both groups had contrasting weapon inventories (yeah, the flamethrower is gonna be crazy).

From what we’ve seen of the graphics so far, we have to admit, things are looking very good. The environments appear to be bigger and more detailed than ever before, and from the videos currently available, the intensity level seems to be through the roof. The key to any good war game is the developer’s ability to convey a sense of urgency and fear, and if they can deliver on that, the rest should fall into place. We have no doubt that Treyarch can nail down the technicals and the control; the final product’s ultimate quality (and popularity) will depend on just how well this game separates itself from the crowd. Call of Duty: World at War is currently scheduled to arrive in November of this year, and right now, we’re thinking it’ll be a huge holiday title. And for those of you who loved Modern Warfare and don’t like the idea of going back to WWII, we strongly suggest giving World at War a chance. Treyarch knows what they have to do, and if they do it, we’re all in for a very big treat!

7/15/2008 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (8 posts)

LegioN
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 @ 5:12:04 AM
Reply

I'm sorry, i'm still not sold i'm STRONGLY against going back to WWII, this would have to be better than CoD4, which i just don't see as being possible. I guess i'll just have to be prooven wrong.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

GamerKid123
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 @ 10:04:22 AM
Reply

So am i, i still reside by my idea of a future or past-modern warfare theme, but TreyArch just don't listen *tuts and sways head*

Last edited by GamerKid123 on 7/16/2008 10:04:41 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Minishmaru
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 @ 11:47:59 AM
Reply

I'll just wait it out like I did with CoD4, after I hear good things. I might pick it up but this isn't one of those "I gotta get it on launch!" or "Gotta preorder this one!"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Tim Speed24
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 @ 12:50:38 PM
Reply

From the looks of the World at War trailer Treyarch is not even close to what Infintiy Ward accomplished. I'll wait untill IW makes a Modern Warfare 2.

It'll take perfect scores to make me want this one. Too many other good shooters coming down the pipe.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Xanavi23
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 @ 2:11:44 PM
Reply

It would/could be a great game but sorry, i have NO interest in WWII in a videogame anymore or at least not for a while. Movies and Documentaries are fine, but games....ehhhhhh im done there.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Daedusian
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 @ 10:10:38 PM
Reply

Have to agree with everyone else here, I really do not want to go back to WW2 again and if the multiplayer is the same, then I'll just stick to COD4, that's if everyone else does lol. Don't really seeing myself paying 60 bucks just for playing online...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MirrorSoul
Thursday, July 17, 2008 @ 12:00:15 PM
Reply

Yea I really dont like the idea of going back to WW2. With games like Resistance 2 and Gears 2 for each system witch are Blockbuster titles I doubt this WW2 flash back will gain much attention!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

elbigchile707
Thursday, September 04, 2008 @ 1:40:25 AM
Reply

i hate going back 2 ww2 cause once u played cod4 u pick a gun thats right for u now u get again the tompson m1 gram its old i want my mp5 custom with a scope

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

So, how's Far Cry 4?
Terrific, one of the best in 2014!
Good game but not amazing.
Okay; nothing special.
Eh, I'm disappointed.

Previous Poll Results