PS3 Reviews: Army of Two Review

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Army of Two Review

More Game Info (Print This Article)

Graphics:

 

7.8

Gameplay:

 

6.9

Sound:

 

6.5

Control:

 

7.9

Replay Value:

 

6.0

Online Gameplay:

 

6.0

Overall Rating:       6.8

 

 

Publisher:

EA

Developer:

EA Montreal

Number Of Players:

1-2 Players (4 Online)

Genre:

Action

  If people recall my E3 coverage from last year, I found myself completely enamored with EA's Army of Two. The game reminded me a lot of Gears of War, and yet it felt like it had a bit more depth to it. Initially planned for a November 2007 release, EA had to delay the game until March 2008 in order to fix some issues and make sure both the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions ran the same. Well, after much anticipation, Army of Two has finally arrived. But in the grand scheme of things, it's not what I had thought it would be.

   There is a large difference between playing a level or two of a game, and then playing the entire game. Army of Two is not a bad game, but it has a number of issues that prevent it from being great. The concept here is a co-op gameplay campaign where it's two soldiers from an elite military squad sent in to do some of the most grueling contract work imaginable. You choose which one of the two rangers you wish to control, Rios or Salem, but they're both capable of doing the same things, really. Throughout your campaign, you'll assist your partner, and vice-versa. You'll be able to switch weapons, co-operatively snipe a target, assign him to hold, advance, or give you support.

   Now, Army of Two features this little system called the Aggro System, where the player doing the most killing and shooting glows red, which in turn attracts all attention to him. When this occurs, the player who isn't attracting attention becomes translucent, and is able to sneak around and take out enemies with stealth. This will come in handy often as you play the game. You can also switch Aggro status by using the D-pad, this makes your partner take on all of the attention, instead.

   At its core, Army of Two is a run-and-gun action shooter. You're able to duck and hide behind objects, as well as peak and shoot over said objects. It has the standard control elements you'd expect, except for one critical one, auto-aim. While I generally do not like auto-aim in action games, Army of Two is a game that needs it bad. The cross-hair is extremely small in the game, so aiming takes patience. But because of the intensity of the game, and the amount of enemies that can appear at once, patience isn't exactly what you'll want to practice when you're trying to take out 12 enemies. And no matter what difficulty you play on, the A.I. will almost always make contact when they shoot, which is fine. It's just that a lot of times you'll get hit before you can even see them - they're way too quick to fire. This becomes annoying further on in the game, when ambushes occur more.

   Speaking of ambushes, at certain times you and your partner will go into a back-to-back mode where you'll take out a horde of enemies that are coming at you, all the while being pressed up against your partner's back. Moreover, you can also grab objects such as car-doors and use them as shields; this will allow your partner to crouch behind you, while shooting over your shield as you walk forward. You can also help each other by performing a step jump, and pull your accomplice up over a ledge. Lastly, if either one of you gets knocked down with an injury, you run up to your partner, drag him to a safe location and heal his wounds by inserting a tampon into them (common practice with actual soldiers).

   You can purchase arms and gears via a weapon shop. You have the choice of Primary Weapons, Secondary Weapons, Special Weapons, and Gear. There's a large number of stuff to buy, such as shotguns, sniper rifles, grenades, automatic rifles, a plethora of handguns, masks, and armor. Unfortunately, there's only three pieces of armor to choose from, light, medium, and heavy - so there isn't a whole lot of depth in that respect. In order to purchase weapons, you'll need to earn cash, which you are rewarded with by completing objectives and missions.

   A lot of that sounds great, right? Ultimately Army of Two's execution falls short. The first few stages are fairly enjoyable, but the feeling of redundancy and repetition is quick to set in. You'll soon begin to feel that Army of Two suffers from a lack of variation, and before you know it, you find yourself bored. Much of the game is nothing but taking out waves and waves of enemies over and over again, and the mission objectives are never satisfying either. Additionally, the story is bland, and the writing is about the cheesiest I've heard in ages. With more diversity, Army of Two could've been one of the best games of 2008. But ultimately, its gameplay doesn't hold up to keep you interested long enough. It's a fun action title, and it has its moments when co-op online, but if you're the type who expects more out of your game purchases, then you will find yourself bored quick.

   Multiplayer modes include the ability to play co-op online and offline, but other online modes only allow for a mere four people to play with - basically, two teams. The modes are Versus, Warzone, Extraction, and Bounties. So not only does Army of Two's gameplay feel hollow, its online component is quite lackluster, too.

   As far as looks go, Army of Two is a pretty good looking game. It's probably one of the very few non-X360 centric multiplatform games that runs flawlessly on the PlayStation 3. The framerate is extremely consistent, as it should be, considering the game's five month delay. Environments are detailed with good looking textures, and the lighting is definitely solid. Character detail is nice, but you don't really see much of them, seeing as how they're covered up from head-to-toe, but at least their gear looks nice.

   But there are also some problems. For a game as destructive as Army of Two, there sure is a lack of environmental interactivity. At best, the only thing you can do is blow up a barrels here and there, and those barrels will almost always be placed for a very specific use, so it's not like you're free to blow them up for the hell of it. Shoot at glass, and it doesn't shatter. Shoot at a structure? It won't crumble. Shoot at the gas tank of a truck? Nothing. And since we're on the topic of explosions, the ones in Army of Two are laughably bad. I kid you not when I say this, but they look almost exactly like the explosions from the very first Medal of Honor game on the original PlayStation. All you see is just this low-quality burst of orange, and that's it. Trust me, it's that bad.

   The audio continues Army of Two's roll of being average. The voice acting is well done, but the dialogue and the writing is absolutely terrible, as I've mentioned before. There's a ton of profanity, so if you've got little kids around, I don't suggest playing the game around them. Sound effects are pretty good, for the most part, as explosions and gun shots do sound nice. And while you play, you'll hear some banter between the two characters and the enemies, as well as a soundtrack in the background.

   Overall, after high hopes, Army of Two falls well short of my expectations. The more I played the game, the more I found myself getting bored of it. It has a lot of great elements to it, such as the entire concept of co-operative gameplay, but it's sorely lacking in execution and variation. Worst of all, a solid online component could've saved the game, but that falls short too, as Army of Two's online is as barren as the rest of the game. It's visually nice, and runs very well, but interaction with the environment is non-existent, and special effects are a joke. While Army of Two isn't a bad game, it's definitely not worth your $60 and tax, so I suggest renting first.

3/14/2008 Arnold Katayev

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (8 posts)

K Phantom
Friday, March 14, 2008 @ 7:19:41 PM
Reply

Wow, The trailers did make it look too good to be true. I guess I won't pick it up, until it goes for twenty bucks or something.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BlinkBoy
Friday, March 14, 2008 @ 7:44:51 PM
Reply

a norwegian reviewer said it was a almost "pathetic and sad, story" the concept made on making money on war made him dislike the whole concept. He gave it 3 of 6. if anyone cares.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

OtisFeelgood
Friday, March 14, 2008 @ 8:47:24 PM
Reply

I have the game and I think it's only good when you're playing with friends off/online.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bamf
Saturday, March 15, 2008 @ 3:57:37 PM
Reply

A bit of a mixed bag for the reviews this game is receiving from the media, but mostly positive score and my mate at the game store says its really good. I don't think its a bad game as bad games are tend to be disliked by most but this is a game where many people do like it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Vivi_Gamer
Saturday, March 15, 2008 @ 6:09:57 PM
Reply

I bought this today, i can see it getting old real fast, the online play is fun but not pushed far enough, theres only 3 or 4 modes/maps its very limited & takes ages to connect, Which is suprising as Burnout Paradise (Which is also an EA game) Connects in seconds. Also with GTA4 & MG4 Online coming soon i doubt i'll use this for online play.The campaigns pretty fun though i've heard its short, i might see if i can return this because i know after i've beat the campaign mode i wont play it much or at all even (Like Assassins Creed)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Fenix88
Monday, March 17, 2008 @ 8:57:54 AM
Reply

I have this on both systems and it's really fun to play especially with your friends. If you like co op game play then you'll like this game. As far as the game being short I don't think it's any shorter than Gears. I like the story and the language of the game cause that's how me and my buds talk to one another. And what's not mentioned is in the cut scenes they keep the weapons and masks you have on. I'm not talking the movie like cut scenes but the others which i thought was cool. EA has said that more maps will be coming. The multi player sounds weak because of only 4 guys but when you play it there is also a group of AI so there's plenty of action. Can't wait for the sequel.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

KidCallaway123
Monday, March 17, 2008 @ 9:42:38 AM
Reply

After playing this game for a while and beating it I can agree with the few positives... The graphics and sound are pretty good. The action sequences are intense and the player movements are real looking. The airplane scene after you finish the China mission is cool as well as sinking the aircraft carrier scene.

Playing the game itself is pretty challenging for me which is fine but at times it also got frustrating with not enough ammo or checkpoints and having to restart from way back in a mission. The controls are a bit tough to get used to as well. The game REALLY needs an auto-aim feature. It would be nice if you could "buy" ammo when you are in the weapons section. Also I was never able to buy grenades at all which would have come in handy.

The co-op play with another player is fun but I have to say that the split screen SUCKS!!!! and they split the screen horizontally to boot?? What the heck was EA thinking on this one I will never know. If they had to split the screen at all it should have been vertically... I am playing on a 60" 1080P Sony LcoS and the way they split the screen is awful. The game is meant to have the players stay close to each other most of the time... They should have made the split screen something that you only need to do when it is necessary in the game play not full time. It takes away alot from the overall experience in my opinion.

I prefer the full screen view you get when playing alone but much prefer to play co-op. The game is good but it could have been great. You "can" get used to the split screen thing after a while. Overall the game is a bit of a disappointment for me. Hopefully the next one will be better.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

duffman2340
Monday, March 17, 2008 @ 1:11:47 PM
Reply

i purchased this game last week and have only really played it on co-op with my friends. i think people are way too criticle of most games these days this def. being one of them. i hav read lots of reviews on it and pretty much all of the reviews go back and forth sayin that they didnt know where ea was going with this game and then saying that it was a good game. i personally think that this game is a lot better than most people are making it out to sound. i mean it is very rare that you go buy a game and it meets all of yours and everybody elses expectations, but that still doesnt make it a bad game. yes there is some glaring weaknesses with this game but overall i would def say that it is far better than average.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

How do you see Assassin's Creed Unity?
I see an awesome game, period.
I see a good game with a few bugs.
I see a fair game with big problems.
I see a glitchy, crappy mess.

Previous Poll Results