PS3 Reviews: Quantum of Solace Review

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Quantum of Solace Review

More Game Info (Print This Article)

Graphics:

 

7.0

Gameplay:

 

6.5

Sound:

 

7.0

Control:

 

8.0

Replay Value:

 

6.5

Online Gameplay:

 

6.5

Overall Rating:       6.8

 

 

Publisher:

Activision

Developer:

Treyarch

Number Of Players:

1 (12 Online)

Genre:

First Person Shooter

If there's one publisher that has the ability to craft some of the best first person shooters, it's definitely Activision. Housing the amazing next-generation Call of Duty engine, Activision can provide all of their developers an opportunity to avoid unnecessary tweaking and fine tuning, and allow them to concentrate on the adventure at hand. Unfortunately for Treyarch, they must've been too preoccupied with using the COD4 engine in order to build Call of Duty: World at War, and forget they still have another FPS game that's in need of attention. And thus, our first attempt at a great James Bond shooter since GoldenEye, has gone down the drain...again.

Despite it's name, Quantum of Solace actually covers the events of both Daniel Craig films, but it starts off with events from Quantum, and leads into playable flashbacks of Casino Royale - the first of which is the, now famous, chase scene from the beginning. The game is more focused on the events of Quantum of Solace, though, so you aren't exactly getting a two-for-one experience here. That said, the game does exaggerate the events of the movies by adding in or extending the gun fights, so as to extend the overall experience.

Expectations for this Bond game were surely high when I found out that it'd be running on the Call of Duty 4 engine. "How could they possibly screw this up?" I said to myself. Well they did. Again. Quantum of Solace utilizes some pretty cool gameplay mechanics, such as a seamless switch to a third-person perspective when you're taking cover, as well as quick time events (QTE) when you're engaged in close-quarters combat. But then the problems begin to arise.

While the general feel of the game seems solid, the objectives and the overall progression shows fault. For one, there is far too much redundancy. A few stages in, you'll quickly realize that you've been doing the same thing the entire time: running for cover, shooting over your back, and repeat. The pace here is largely axed by the cover mechanic in the game, which Treyarch abuses to the point that it's just tiresome after a while. The objectives also don't come off as very diverse, and you'll largely find yourself going off on generic tasks and missions.

If you can get past the average game structure, and you're just looking for a game where you can just shoot, shoot, shoot, then Quantum of Solace should appease you. But if you're looking for a really polished experience and are looking for Call of Duty quality here, you won't find it. I will say that aside from the objectives, the gameplay actually has quite a bit of potential, which makes the multiplayer portion of the game quite a bit of fun, assuming you can find people to play with.

Unfortunately, even the multiplayer aspect is below average, as it only supports a meager 12 people. This leaves me asking, why go through the trouble of using such a great game engine, when you don't even utilize the strengths that made it great in the first place? Since Treyarch was working on COD: World at War, why not employ that knowledge and inject it into Quantum of Solace, as well? Why not make Quantum feature that same kind of attention to detail as Call of Duty? Why give us such a generic story mode? Why rob us of total players online? And why not give us any co-op modes? Even if Quantum of Solace boasted better mission structure, it'd still be too barebones to be considered anything great.

As far as the visual execution goes, I will give Treyarch some credit in that department. While the game may start off a bit on the bland side, as the underground portion seems a bit...gray, as soon as you make it outside, you'll notice that the graphics begin to shine a bit more. The visuals are a mixed bag, as the outdoor areas boast some really nice texture work all over the buildings and such, but the indoor stuff isn't as impressive. Unfortunately, some of the more nature-friendly areas aren't exactly filled with great looking foliage, another aspect that COD4 did well, but Quantum doesn't.

Additionally, the framerate isn't nearly as stable as that of COD4, which further makes less sense to us; but it isn't terrible, as we've certainly seen much worse. Lastly, I do like the fact that Daniel Craig looks pretty much spot-on, and there are no issues with picture clarity, or things like pop-up. All in all, the graphics aren't awful, but they certainly don't do the COD4 engine a grain of justice.

As you would expect, voice acting is plentiful in the game, and it helps that Daniel Craig and some of the crew contribute to the in-game dialogue. There's some banter during gameplay, but you'll hear most of it from the cut-scenes. Sound effects aren't shabby, but don't really stand out all too much; gun fire does sound good and powerful, though.

Overall, Quantum of Solace is far from being the next GoldenEye, and considering the game engine that it runs on, that's a real shame. Between working on COD: World at War, Spider-Man: Web of Shadows, and this, Treyarch was bound to pay less attention to one game, the film licensed one. There are some rather solid qualities that can be found, and they come alive when you're playing online, but even the multiplayer suffers from a lack of depth and features. Quantum of Solace doesn't break the mold of bad movie to game adaptations.

12/25/2008 Arnold Katayev

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (9 posts)

Qubex
Thursday, December 25, 2008 @ 9:50:11 PM
Reply

I was afraid it would be a let down... and not surprised in the least... when will movie/game company tie-ins every get it right?

Q!

"i aM HOmE

Last edited by Qubex on 12/25/2008 9:50:59 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Enfildate
Thursday, December 25, 2008 @ 9:55:29 PM
Reply

Hey Arnold, have you ever played Everything or Nothing for the PS2? I personally think that is the best bond game made.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

eLLeJuss
Thursday, December 25, 2008 @ 10:59:17 PM

wtf? what about goldeneye? Goldeneye was TeH BeST! xD

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

www
Friday, December 26, 2008 @ 6:24:16 AM

Goldeneye was considered best cause it was one of the first ever realistic FPS games,there was quake n the rest but there weren't as good as goldeneye.
Thus i think any other Bond game coming out after Goldeneye will not be highly rated cause we have several fps-es now.Every thing or nothing was damn good no doubt but that first time-playing-goldeneye-feeling is lost cause we're used to so many kinds of fps now,iykwim.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, December 26, 2008 @ 12:13:37 AM
Reply

Let's use the F word. Flop.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

dillonthebunny
Friday, December 26, 2008 @ 3:09:16 AM
Reply

thats a harsh score...

I got this over two weeks ago, it has stayed in my collection as a dusty game until just the other day when I decided it was time.

I actualy dont think its all that bad!

the single player game isnt brilliant, true.. but its all do-able. but for me its the online side of things that has me hooked.

online its like Rainbow6 but with a healthy injection of the CoD virus, meaning its fun (shock horror). the weapon upgreades are pretty cool and the map layouts are imo very well designed.

clipping is a pain in the arse but overall I was rather impressed.. I expected it to be way worse.

I picked it up for £20 in HMV.. its £40 everywhere else, and HMV isnt the cheapest place to shop so I was very surprised!

I say if you have played the rest and want something that is fun online but nothing epic like Cod or R2 especially if you are aiming low on this game in terms of opinion, pick this up.. you might be surprised.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Tim Speed24
Friday, December 26, 2008 @ 10:15:08 AM

I agree with TheBunny. This 007 game is probably one of the best Bond games out there. It has Rainbow 6 style game play...stealth or run and gun..and was a lot of fun to play.

NightFire is still the best Bond shooter of the last gen IMO.

Try playing Golden Eye again and you will notice bland enviroments and dated gameplay compared to todays shooters.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

www
Friday, December 26, 2008 @ 6:26:27 AM
Reply

The only problem with these 007 games is........they are just too short!
Maybe Rare should take back there franchise.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

DUH DIM
Friday, January 02, 2009 @ 12:18:35 PM
Reply

It was more casino royale than quantim of solace to me and that was disapointing.


timster118 is correct nightfire is a beastly game

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

2014 PSXE Reader's Choice GotY: Vote Now!
Watch Dogs
Dark Souls II
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Velocity 2X
inFamous: Second Son
Far Cry 4
Dragon Age: Inqusition
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Assassin's Creed Unity
Child of Light

Previous Poll Results