PS3 Reviews: Naughty Bear Review

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Naughty Bear Review

More Game Info (Print This Article)

Graphics:

 

4.4

Gameplay:

 

4.0

Sound:

 

4.7

Control:

 

4.2

Replay Value:

 

3.4

Online Gameplay:

 

3.9

Overall Rating:       3.8

 

 

Publisher:

505 Games

Developer:

A2M

Number Of Players:

1-2

Genre:

Action/Adventure

You know, when I first heard about the concept behind Naughty Bear and started checking out some video installments of the maliciously hilarious “Book of Naughty,” I was quite enthusiastic about it. It was sort of like stomping on fuzzy childhood memories but there was a sadistically gleeful side of me that desperately wanted to beat the stuffing out of roving toy bears. …please don’t ask me why. Perhaps I need help. But then again, none of this really matters in the slightest because the game turned out to be a waste of my time, primarily due to poor execution, repetitive and unfulfilling gameplay, and a constant reminder of all the missed opportunities. This latter downfall made the experience all the more frustrating; every few minutes, I’d say to myself: “damn, it would’ve been so cool if they had done this…” It’s just too bad.

The low-grade graphics are part of the reason Naughty Bear trips and stumbles. It’s certainly colorful and I particularly liked some of the animations; I laughed out loud when a bear safely locked inside a house mocked me with the standard, tongue out, fingers waggling in the ears expression. The cut-scenes are decent, too, but that’s where the good news ends. There’s clipping and graphical hitches galore during the gameplay, the special effects are nowhere near where they need to be, and the level of detail and polish falls well below par for this generation. I understand the need to keep it cartoon-y – it’s the contrast, similar to what we saw in Fairytale Fights, that works – but without the requisite amount of refinement, the flaws become painfully evident. The minute you start to become somewhat immersed in the atmosphere, you spot another major drawback that makes you frown in disappointment. Overall, “lackluster” is almost too good of a description.

The sound is a little better, only due to the crisp sound effects that accompany your achievements (but do not accompany even the most brutal kills) and a genuinely humorous narrator. The soundtrack is almost as repetitive as the gameplay and it always takes a back seat to the effects, which aren’t even remotely memorable. One would expect that with the ability to burn bears to a crisp, hack the stuffing out of them, or electrocute their unknowing heads, the sound would be hysterically grisly. Instead, it all sounds sort of muted and dull, and only very occasionally does the sound seem to enhance your killing spree. There’s also a significant balancing issue, as some of the environmental effects are much louder than others, and far-off sounds can be just as loud as up-close-and-personal audio. As a whole, the technicals just don’t work very well and again, it’s a shame.

I suppose we could get past the shoddy technical aspects of any production if the gameplay is fun, tight, and ultimately satisfying. And although it starts off semi-entertaining, everything gets old really fast, for a number of reasons. But first, let’s start on a positive note- the game starts as “naughty bear” is shunned from a birthday party. He wasn’t invited and when he still tries to act in good faith and show up with a present, he’s laughed off the premises. Well, this causes him to snap and sets the tone for the rest of the adventure: you’re gonna get your revenge, and it doesn’t matter if the bear deserves it or not. The goal is to find new and unique ways to terrorize the inhabitants of the town, and this can involve scaring the crap out of them, torturing them, and executing insane kills with either environmental tools or a variety of weapons, ranging from axes, baseball bats and even a gun.

Sounds just plain nutty, right? You can hide in wooded areas with a big palm leaf shielding your existence, lay down traps for unsuspecting wanderers, sneak up behind bears and push them into bonfires, shove them into electrical boxes, and even scrape their head along turntables. Each weapon has a unique kill animation; after beating on a bear enough, you have the option of hitting the R2 button and executing an immediate kill: if you’ve got a stick, naughty bear will actually sit on his victim and rub the stick into his or her face until the bear ignites. He’ll just keep beating on an opponent with a bat and if you so choose, you can even scare the ever-loving crap out of them (this could even result in death). The game encourages you to be inventive and switch it up; your “kill chain” continues to fill if you keep using different weapons and finding new ways to slay bears.

Yeah, great. Unfortunately, the problems are everywhere. First of all, as soon as one bear is alerted, every last bear in the vicinity is alerted, and will remain so forever. That basically eliminates any chance you have at stealth, although you might get lucky as the entirely unreliable AI might cause a fleeing bear to suddenly stop and warm his hands at a bonfire. Furthermore, while they can never seem to hear you run up behind them, they apparently have super-bear hearing when you’re slinking around outside and they’re inside a house. You’ll likely have seen most every unique kill animation within the first hour of play, picking up a gun turns the game into a slow-moving, badly conceived third-person shooter, and the massive clipping issues combined with poor visuals really hinder the experience. In the end, I just got really bored and really disappointed.

You end up doing the same things over and over and all the fun goes away extremely quickly. How bears are alerted and how they react appear entirely random and erratic, there’s only so many times you can stab a bear in the stomach before you start to yawn, the stealth (sneaking, hiding) and action (combat, general movement) is essentially broken and oh yes, the camera is downright awful. One time, I laid a trap just outside a door and when the bear got stuck and I went up to finish the job, the camera view got so wonked-out, I was seeing bits and pieces of bears and houses and trees in strobe-like, screwed-up display. Naughty Bear is just another game that features a great concept but fails miserably in execution, which is why you really shouldn’t bother paying full pop for this one. Maybe when it arrives in the bargain bin (which won’t be long) and you’ve got absolutely nothing to do…and you’re a touch masochistic…

7/6/2010 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (50 posts)

MartyRules
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:15:00 PM
Reply

To bad, I had high hopes for this game. oh well I guess I need to save for next couple of months NE way

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:20:06 PM
Reply

Wow, to tell the truth though I never understood why so many people thought this would be a good game.

Agree with this comment 7 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

Kangasfwa
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:28:05 PM

Especially when since it's developed by A2M, the makers behind Wet.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 12:02:39 AM

Wet was mediocre, this sounds like trash, but I haven't played it (nor will I) but I trust Ben.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JMO_INDY
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:20:27 PM
Reply

For shame...naughty developers.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:20:49 PM
Reply

Wouldn't just about ANYONE snap if the same things happened to them? Can't really blame this bear can we?

I'll tell you though, your comment about warming hands at the bonfire was hilarious. Great review.

You only left out the part where you feel like a creep walking around the store holding this game for purchase.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

fluffer nutter
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:46:39 PM

I thought he was sent a copy to review?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:24:14 PM
Reply

Too bad, this had a lot of potential

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Danny007
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:24:43 PM
Reply

I was expecting it to be low, but not that low. Dang, I had high expectations for this game. O well... Thanks for warning us Ben.

Last edited by Danny007 on 7/6/2010 10:25:58 PM

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Mamills
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:25:10 PM
Reply

Yet another game going nowhere, never expected anything from it. i really don't know why people expected anything from it.

What was with the hype?

looked like crap from the get go. not to say a game like this cant work.
conkers bad fur day was awesome, this is not.
Graphics are horrible, gameplay looks dull and it doesn't even seem funny.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:35:46 PM

That's along the lines of what I was thinking.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:31:11 PM
Reply

OUCH! That's a bad score. This game must absolutely suck.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bugzbunny109
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:39:42 PM
Reply

3.8?! Oh my god!!!! I have never seen a review score this generation that low.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Mr Bitey
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 3:27:44 PM

Rouge Warrior

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 10:52:17 PM
Reply

I've never seen a game with a score this low.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

MyWorstNightmar
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:21:37 PM

And you can only imagine Mr.__________ will think it to be one of the greatest games of all time. I am waiting for his comment.

Agree with this comment 8 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:30:31 PM

Wouldn't surprise me. Maybe this was the game he had in mind when he said Xbox devs are putting out games that make Uncharted 2 look like a last generation game. lol!

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Kangasfwa
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:34:50 PM

I found a game called "riding star" (i think that's its title) for the PS2 rated 1.5 (or close to that, it was below 2 I remember).

Anyway, Ben and Arnold, your work is much appreciated.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:50:00 PM

http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-reviews/240.html

http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-reviews/349.html

http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-reviews/155.html

http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-reviews/200.html

http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-reviews/13.html

http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-reviews/356.html

And we have 28 PS2 reviews on record that have scored a 3.8 or below. Trust me...there is plenty of awfulness out there, but usually, only critics know about it. LOL

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 12:05:55 AM

lol nice, i haven't dug around the reviews, thanks for linking them.

EDIT: I completely missed that Last Rebellion review.

Last edited by Jawknee on 7/7/2010 12:08:56 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Vitron
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 12:11:51 AM

MyWOrst.

LOL, so true.


Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BikerSaint
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:49:31 PM
Reply

Good memory, Kangasfwa!

It was Riding Star(for the PS2), and it got a 1.6 rating from Ben.

I'm not absolutely positive so don't quote me, but I think RS's 1.6 might just be the lowest score ever given to a review here.

Ben should be around soon enough to tell us, though.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:50:25 PM

Yep, and it is indeed the lowest.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Banky A
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @ 11:55:10 PM
Reply

Just can't get up there with Naughty Dog can it?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 12:00:58 AM
Reply

Well, it was developed by A2M. Not a pleasant visual there to begin with.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Vitron
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 12:08:32 AM
Reply

Wow I could not believe it would be this bad.

Thanks Ben for the warning


Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

sonic1899
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 12:16:05 AM
Reply

I knew I was going say this game was "bad"...but not in the old sense of the word... :P

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Robochic
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 12:25:58 AM
Reply

Ben Thank you for the warning, defently a bargain bin game.

@ MyWorstNightmar & Jawknee LOL so F'ing true. LOL!!! u made my night.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BikerSaint
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 2:15:00 AM
Reply

Low score or not, I'll still get it.
Just as soon it's in the $5 bargain bin, for my collection.

And I still need Riding Star for my PS2 collection, but I won't pay more than 50cents to a buck for it.

And it had better have a mint copy, manual & case too(although I'm sure most copy's are mint, & were put away after only one sitting, once the little tykes saw it more as a T.P. day at the crapola festival).

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

spiderboi
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 2:40:41 AM
Reply

I was pretty amused by the concept of this game. thanks Ben for not letting me have the mistake of buying this :)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 3:38:36 AM
Reply

i always saw this game as fairytale frights, i always said to myself how bad could it be?
after playing fairytale frights i was 100% positive it will be the worst game i ever play.
oh, how wrong i was!
i thought it would be impossible, like the getting all your limbs blown off, thrown off a 1000 story building, getting fed into a wood chipper, than covered in thermite than lit , and surviving impossible!
sadly i was wrong.
lets hope naughty bear will not prove me wrong again.

what is the point of this game?
HONESTLY!
killing bears?
what for?
because its naughty?
OMFG!!!!!!!
remember watching those serial killer shows and thinking to yourself what in gods name would possess someone to do a sick thing like that?
well now i have the answer!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 9:02:50 AM

OK.....so, does that mean that you like it?

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 9:13:15 AM

ahhhhhh i say its the worst game i have ever played, and you misconstrue that to me liking it?
im talking to turtles or something am i?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 9:36:34 AM

No, but you were hardly clear with your post, were you? That is why I asked.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 9:49:44 AM

Same boat with Highlander, took me a while to figure out that you actually hate Naughty Bear.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Thursday, July 08, 2010 @ 9:08:14 AM

how is calling a game the worst game i have ever played unclear?

i hate the game because it is so boring and pointless.
you just go running around killing bears for the sake of it.
fairytale frights at least had a point to it, it had a plot, naughty bear does not.
its willy nilly for the sake of willy nilly.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 3:52:47 AM
Reply

Yeah I was hoping this game would be fun just because I thought it would be hilarious to find as many sadistic ways as possible to kill stuffed teddy bears. However I was afraid this would be the case which is why I didn't pre-order and am now never going to play it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Wage SLAVES
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 6:21:58 AM
Reply

Dayamn! WIPEOUT!!!!

I was kinda hoping it would turn out like Conker...thanks Ben for taking one for the team. Ouch...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JackC8
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 7:04:51 AM
Reply

It sounded like an extremely lame gimmick right from the start: teddy bears killing each other - isn't that cool!?!? Maybe for about 5 minutes. Not surprising it turned out like crap.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 9:46:23 AM
Reply

Even when I watched the a footage of it for the first time, nothing looks appealing to me.....

Has 505 Games ever released any good games?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

NeoHumpty
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 9:48:32 AM
Reply

lol. I actually did a double take on the score. I didn't have high hopes for it, but dayum. Maybe they should have made is smaller and downloadable....and made it work right.....

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bOnEs
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 10:36:19 AM
Reply

i expected this low score after seeing what other sites were giving this game... but, i am still not turned away... i WILL rent this game someday soon because, even if it is repetitive, it's no different than a flash game, or the playstation minis...

i am used to repetitiveness... all games have it... even one of my most cherished ones, the GTA series, has a lot of repetitiveness...

it's the glitches and bad camera angles that could bother me a bit but, i still think the overall concept sounds like fun... so, i will rent this someday soon, i just won't go out and buy a copy...

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ro kurorai
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 12:15:42 PM
Reply

Turns out we have to get our cutesy-cartoon-violence-fix by playing Conker's Bad Fur Day - the N64 original, not the butchered Xbox re-make ^^
CBFD was violent, mature, vulgar, hilarious, witty and featured superb art direction, as expected by RareWare (when they were still working for Nintendo).

The story was excellent as well and the voice acting was the best of its time (comparable to U2's or RDR's nowadays).
Not to mention all the fantastic movie parodies and the stellar MP, which imo was better than GoldenEye's, way more fun and variety :P

Last edited by ro kurorai on 7/7/2010 12:18:43 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

CharlesD
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 1:37:51 PM
Reply

Must say I was quite disappointed with this one. I was looking forward to it due to the hope that the concept could be brought to justice w. a halfway decent control and display scheme. Even if it scored in the low seven range I would have probably picked it up. Looks like this epic fail will render the concept entirely unusable:'(

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

hadouken
Wednesday, July 07, 2010 @ 7:48:36 PM
Reply

Really for reason I didn't think this was going to be any good. I guess too bad huh!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

DazeOfWar
Thursday, July 08, 2010 @ 4:42:28 PM
Reply

Sure glad I wasn't planning on buying this.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SirLoin of Beef
Thursday, July 08, 2010 @ 9:02:10 PM
Reply

Too bad. After seeing some initial stuff about, I was intrigued by the concept. After reading this review and others like it, I'll be passing on this one.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BikerSaint
Thursday, July 08, 2010 @ 10:11:29 PM
Reply

I'm so mad they they screwed this game up.....

...that I just ripped all the freakin' heads off of my gummy bears!!!!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

cassaday
Friday, July 09, 2010 @ 9:40:18 PM
Reply

It really sounds like this should have been a Downloadable title. I thought the idea would have been great for a "novelty" game, you know, fun for a few hours and then you leave it alone. I guess it doesn't even deserve that!

Thanks for the review.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bandit King
Saturday, July 10, 2010 @ 10:20:51 AM
Reply

Well, I can't say I'm shocked. After playing the demo of WET I moved A2M to my list of crappy devs/publishers. WET suffered all the issues mentioned here, clipping, poor graphics and just about everything falling well below par for this generation. A2M/505 games reminds me of those guys that made that terrible XBlades game.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Are you getting Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor?
Yup, I'm nabbing this one now.
Yes, but I'm waiting for a while.
Maybe...not sure yet.
No, not interested.

Previous Poll Results