PS3 Reviews: Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days Review

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days Review

More Game Info (Print This Article)

Graphics:

 

7.3

Gameplay:

 

7.6

Sound:

 

8.1

Control:

 

7.8

Replay Value:

 

7.5

Online Gameplay:

 

8.0

Overall Rating:       7.7

 

 

Publisher:

Eidos

Developer:

Io Interactive

Number Of Players:

1-2 (16 Online)

Genre:

Action

A massive review controversy we won’t detail again overshadowed the original Kane & Lynch but in retrospect, the first effort was relatively solid, with the exception of significant consistency and control issues. Some people really enjoyed it but in truth, there were better games available at the time. Now, nearly two years and nine months after the first title launched, the competition in this generation is stiffer than ever. Therefore, Io absolutely needed to step up and give us the game Dead Men could’ve been and in all honesty, should’ve been. Did they do it…? The answer to that question may be more difficult than initially believed, if only because we’ve learned there is an inordinately large amount of subjectivity involved in the analysis of this project. From where I sit, I think the quirks and eccentricities, which may be viewed as flaws by others, make this game what it is: a good, gritty, white-knuckle drama. Unfortunately, it just gets too repetitive, and too frustrating.

The graphics are the lowlight of the entire presentation, as they were in the first game. These are certainly better in comparison – better detail, better animations, more dynamic overall design – but when stacked up against other visually impressive games on the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, it falls short. Again, though, we enter into that subjectivity snafu: to me, they could’ve done more with the stark and even bland backdrops, and character design isn’t anything special. On the other hand, some could claim the graphics enhance the gritty, hectic atmosphere; that “blandness” could indeed be metaphorical in regards to the developer’s aim. Well, all right. But I still say an extra dose of color and animation fluidity (AI enemies will sometimes jerk ahead at a faster rate) would’ve helped. All in all, it needed another coat of polish. Still, I willingly acknowledge both sides of the graphics argument in this particular case.

In the first Kane & Lynch, the graphics weren’t great but the sound was a definite bonus throughout. Dog Days follows right in line: the effects and voice acting are once again pretty damn good; gunfights are absolutely loaded with the requisite sounds to put such experiences over the top. Allies yelling, bullets smacking into various objects and walls, and the crystal-clear, ultra-intimidating crack of weapon fire…it’s all just nuts. I really did kept thinking I was in the massive street battle in “Heat,” and that’s a very good thing. The soundtrack is iffy because the music isn’t heard very often at all, and when it is, it plays second fiddle to those in-your-face effects. The voice acting, while not exactly elite, still resides in the upper tier for voiceover performances this generation. Right from the start, it’s really the sound that will grab you, and it won’t let go throughout your insane adventure.

In this sequel, you will control the sociopath Lynch, who once again has Kane as an accomplice. From the start, though, Kane isn’t too happy with the way things are going in Shanghai (Lynch promised a simple job and it’s anything but), and Lynch is driving the story forward. The story spans 48 hours and those two days couldn’t possibly be any more harrowing and downright sadistic in nature, so prepare for a rollercoaster ride of epic proportions. The story in the original was actually decent and this time, it’s a little better. Furthermore, given the way this two-day murderous romp plays out, you’ll constantly be breathing heavy. It’s just so goddamn out of control. It’s entirely and altogether unrealistic, of course, but ironically enough, the gameplay itself tries to be somewhat authentic. You can’t take many bullets before hitting the ground and if you try advancing before it’s advisable to do so, you’ll likely end up eating dirt. You’ll need a steady hand, a good head for action, and patience.

If you played the demo or have seen recent footage, you’ll notice the “shaky camera” feel. Io implemented this to give the game that extra something; a documentary-like quality that makes it seem as if an amateur cameraman is filming the entire thing. It’s extra shaky when sprinting or when the gameplay is particularly chaotic, but basically stops when you’re hunkered down in cover in the midst of a nasty firefight. I think it’s necessary as part of the aforementioned developer vision but if you don’t like it – or it’s making you seasick – you do have the option to disable it. Then it just adopts a standard third-person view with no “shakiness.” The control itself still feels a little loose to me, although not as loose as it was in Dead Men. You snap into cover with little difficulty and with the help of an Aim Assist, you feel a bit more effective when outnumbered about 20 to 2. I just wish it felt like Lynch had some weight when moving; it’s too…flighty.

I like the default control layout, though. Everything is right there at your fingertips as it should be; you aim with L1 and fire with R1, reload with R2, sprint with L2, pick up ammo with Square, switch weapons with Triangle, hurdle over cover with X, and grab a human shield with Circle. You can only carry two weapons at once and you always have to look around for more ammo. Thankfully, the game realizes that you might be missing a lot and expending countless rounds is inevitable, so you can snag most any fallen enemy’s gun when necessary. You’ll soon learn that being out in the open is a tremendously bad idea and you had best not press forward until you’re convinced it’s clear. At one point, an enemy rushed out of a room around a corner, and I died three times as a result. Obviously, the first time, I didn’t know he’d be there. But he still managed to kill me two more times even with that knowledge, and it’s simply because I kept trying to move forward when my allies were still behind.

But let’s deal with the issues. Firstly, too many of the guns feel entirely useless at any sort of range. Initially, you might think you’re just not aiming very well – which may be the case – but soon, you realize that few of your bullets will hit their target, even if you’ve got them directly in the crosshairs. Better weapons that actually make you feel somewhat effective are available, but they don’t show up for at least a few hours. Secondly, the AI shows glimpses of greatness, like when they actively flank you and shift their position when getting pegged, but it’s too erratic. Sometimes, it almost seems random where they choose to take cover, which results in some silliness. Thirdly and by far the most annoying: while you apparently suck as a marksman with many weapons, your enemies can hit a moving target a mile away. They just never miss. Heck, you can even get hit while in cover if any part of your body is showing in the direction of the bullets.

Oh, and while the intensity, grit and emotion is there, the gameplay gets very repetitive. It’s just one ridiculous gunfight after another and it gets tiresome after a while. To its credit, the story and environment never let up; it’s always nutty and at one point, the two morally-challenged “heroes” are running around naked and coated in blood due to what appears to be hundreds of cuts and slashes. How anyone can even move, let alone run and get involved in gunfights, is beyond me; your entire body is one giant slash, for crying out loud. By the way, the private parts are “fuzzied out,” just like any headshots…that may seem like an odd decision concerning the subject matter and over-the-top disgusting factor, but I refer you back to the amateur-cameraman, documentary-like style. It fits. This is one game that might garner a ton of controversy if Fox News ever got a hold of it; the sheer number of dead police officers and civilians is about as shocking as it should be.

The multiplayer is well worth looking into, as it’s usually fun and the various modes feel relatively fresh. There’s also an Arcade Mode to toy around with, and that adds more variety to a game that needs it; the repetitiveness of the single-player can indeed be offset by either the Arcade or online modes. And don’t forget; there are two main characters here, so co-op split-screen is another option, and quite possibly the best of them all. In the end, Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days is better than the first title, but due to lackluster visuals (lights above can even leave visible bars on the screen), erratic AI, and the frustration level enhanced by foes that never miss and guns that suck, it still falls shy of the “must-try” plateau. But if you really like the visceral, seriously twisted and demented atmosphere, and you mix things up with Arcade and online multiplayer (love Cops and Robbers!), the game is certainly worth your attention.

It’s probably more worth it because there’s little in the way of competition right now, so it was good timing. But play it now; don’t wait. By October, there will be better options out there.

P.S. I started writing this review well before any reviews came out; in the first paragraph, I said there’s a lot more subjectivity involved than normal. Come today, I see as low as 4s and 5s, and as high as two 8.5s and an 8. So…see? ;)

8/17/2010 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (23 posts)

kraygen
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 11:09:37 AM
Reply

Still seems like a high score if you ask me. Graphics were bad, making it look like a grindhouse film, isn't cool or interesting its just trying to cover how bad the graphics are in my opinion.

I guess to each his own, but I still won't be playing it. Sometimes the game is better than the demo, but if I don't even want to finish the demo, no way I'm buying the game.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 11:12:02 AM

I won't be getting this either. The demo was terrible and the graphics looked terrible. There are PS2 that look better than this one.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

vicious54
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 11:16:45 AM

I with you guys, the graphics in the demo looked atrocious and I didn't like the feel of the character's movements.

Nice review though.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

NeoHumpty
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 2:03:55 PM

Eh. I didn't mind the graphics so much, and I dug the gritty feel to the demo. But, I'll pass. Good review as always, Ben. Thanks.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 11:10:06 AM
Reply

Ben. Have you ver thought about doing video reviews?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WolfCrimson
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 11:28:11 AM

Wouldn't that be more time-consuming? I remember Ben saying (writing) that he'll be pretty busy these next few months, so I dunno if he'd want to do it... but if he (and Arnold) don't mind, why not? It'd be a nice change.

Personally, I'd rather read than watch.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Vivi_Gamer
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 12:25:02 PM

Same here, if they were to do video reviews they might aswell just be another child blogging mindlessly on youtube. No, i prefer the written reviews.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 12:44:02 PM

Eh, thought about it. A podcast of some kind is more likely.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 4:25:45 PM

I should do a podcast, that would be a laff-riot.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Xombito
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 11:21:52 AM
Reply

I'm still interested. I always had a soft spot for the Kane and Lynch (the game, not them). I'm not paying full price for this though like I did for first game.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

tlpn99
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 11:31:30 AM
Reply

I wont be buying this either right off the bat I may wait till it's in the bargain bin. The 1st was ridiculous where I got stuck as did my mate we both ended up trading it in it was that crap.

Thanks for the honest review Ben but im deffo waiting till it's cheap or someone buys it and it's sitting on the shelf with a decent priced pre owned value on it :)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 4:26:35 PM

Was it the spot where you have to shoot the guy in the truck?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

tlpn99
Friday, August 20, 2010 @ 6:27:59 AM

It was indeed World, we both got very frustrated at this and got rid of the game after many tries of the exact same spot. :(

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ultimate_Balla
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 11:54:19 AM
Reply

LOL @ hit you from a mile away

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Vivi_Gamer
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 12:02:19 PM
Reply

I enjoyed the frist game, mind you once i completed it i never turned back, but i did enjoy it. I always felt the game had a cineamtic syle to it. This game seems to have continued that tradition in the 'modern' way of film entertainment, which lacks any essence of cinematography and just aims for realism of course i'm talkign about the camera style, i've never been found of the SHAKY SHAKY so i am not really encouraged by seeing it now in games.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BeezleDrop
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 12:11:35 PM
Reply

I will just be renting it, I actually enjoyed the demo quite a bit. Fool me once shame on me, Fool me twice, Shame on You!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

gangan19
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 12:30:24 PM
Reply

Didn't want the first one cause i couldn't invert my controls.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 12:43:44 PM

You can invert the controls here.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bugzbunny109
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 2:36:10 PM
Reply

I was very disappointed with the first one. Consequently, I traded in the first game before I got half way through it. Then I played the demo for the second game, and was also disappointed. I ended up quiting the demo before I even got half way through it....

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BikerSaint
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 3:55:29 PM
Reply

As I already said in the K&L2 DLC thread,
Maybe if they had concentrated their full team to making the game first, rather than chopping the team up to make DLC too, it would have most likely been a much better game.

And I'll still get it cause I like the character of that psychotic Lynch so I want to see what crazy shite he's going to get Kane into this time.

But due to them doing the DLC at the same time, I'll just wait for a cheap used bargain bin copy, especially since it will never get it's own GOTY copy, LMAO

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 4:28:44 PM
Reply

I will probably pass on this. I got the first one because I wanted a third person shooter on my PS3 and never finished it. Thanks for the review, I had secretly wished they improved it a lot, but it doesn't sound that way.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Wednesday, August 18, 2010 @ 4:31:45 AM
Reply

hit detection issues, poor broken controls, crappy graphics, poor sound, repetitive missions, crap story, bugs galore and it gets a 7.7?
DAM what does a game have to do to get a 5?
this is slightly better than the original, but with all the same issues just more fun.
the level design brought this game out, without that it would of been a slump!
to be honest id much rather play dead to rights retribution than this!
at least that had a proper cover system, non broken controls and great stealth missions!
lasts longer too!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

VOICE
Saturday, May 14, 2011 @ 4:00:51 AM
Reply

Just picked this up the other day. 14.00 used, got to playing it today. I must say I agree with ben on most points. However, I am one of those people that stuck it out through the first because of how much I liked the characters.

On to the dog days I went, excited. I will say my only gripe about it that matters to me is that I beat it on normal difficulty in 5 hours. But those 5 hours were a RIOT!!

Graphics? Not the workhorse of this title, they are good though. But there have been PLENTY of games that had beautiful graphics that I absolutely hated. The main draw for me was the visceral storyline, and protagonists that I cared about ( even though they are "bad guys" ).

I would say that if you liked the first ( and beat it on all difficulties as I did ), then there is no reason to not pick this title up. Arcade mode alone is going to keep me happy till PSN comes back.

And by the way. I'm back. If anyone remembers me.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

What do you think of the Destiny beta?
It's awesome! Can't wait for September!
It's only good, but I'm having fun.
Eh, it's okay, but I expected more.
It sucks, period.

Previous Poll Results