PS3 Reviews: R.U.S.E. Review

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

R.U.S.E. Review

More Game Info (Print This Article)

Graphics:

 

7.1

Gameplay:

 

8.3

Sound:

 

7.3

Control:

 

8.1

Replay Value:

 

8.5

Online Gameplay:

 

8.5

Overall Rating:       7.9

 

 

Publisher:

Ubisoft

Developer:

Eugen Systems

Number Of Players:

1-4

Genre:

RTS

Real-time strategy aficionados typically stick to the PC, and for good reason. But if you’re looking for a competent RTS with a bit of a twist, and are willing to deal with a mediocre campaign story and a few small mechanical shortcomings, R.U.S.E. will likely fit the bill. The mere existence of “ruses” might warrant a look, simply because such deceptive tactics are amusing and fun to use, and a carefully timed ruse can easily alter the ebb and flow of battle. Furthermore, although it may appear to be a bit more simplistic than other RTSs available, time will yield the goods: there’s a lot more beneath the surface than one might initially believe (the game starts slow, especially if you don’t partake of the Battles or online multiplayer modes). It’s too bad they didn’t work harder at the story, and there are some gameplay limitations that might scare off hardcore strategy fans but still, Eugen Systems has produced a fairly solid title.

As always, the visuals take a back seat to the gameplay; strategy is all about sitting down and carefully formulating a plan of attack. It isn’t about ogling cutting-edge graphical presentations. That being said, there’s still too much pop-in when panning about the battlefields and many of the landscapes appear drab and dark. The highlight focuses on the various ways in which you can view the action: pulling away reveals the entire map on a table, where colonels and generals toil in the background. Zooming in brings you up close and personal with the action, where you can see individual foot soldiers and other units moving and firing. The special effects aren’t overly “special” but they work pretty well for an RTS, especially considering that most strategy games don’t use such a dynamic style. The character designs are just plain weird, though, and the lack of artistic excellence – not much besides generic WWII stuff here – sort of holds everything back.

Thanks to a good soundtrack that fits the on-field strategy, and the crisp battle reports (both from weaponry and commanding officers), the sound manages to succeed. The only downside is the voice acting, which is only average at best, although the actors can’t really be blamed for poor writing. I particularly liked zooming in all the way and hearing everything that’s happening: it’s not an all-out action experience and yet, one senses the chaotic atmosphere that only war can generate. One could argue that the effects should be even more intense when close to the combat but for the most part, fans of the genre will like what they hear. The soundtrack could’ve been more prominent and the campaign suffers due to the aforementioned voice issues, but don’t let that dissuade you. The majority of the time, you’ll be in the midst of a battle and that just so happens to be where the sound shines.

Let’s start with the campaign, which begins slowly and follows the rise of Joe Sheridan in the U.S. army. He begins as a major and rises up the ranks during World War II, all the while fighting against German forces and pursuing one mysterious individual – known only as Prometheus – who he blames for “sending a lot of boys home in pine boxes.” It’s not a very engaging story and with the forgettable voiceovers and often lame dialogue, you’ll soon want to skip over the plot-related scenes. However, even when you are engaged in battle, updates will often cause you to temporarily lose track of the map action. When the omnipotent commander issues a new objective, you can’t do anything while the game processes that objective for a few moments (during which time, units will continue to move). The game will also wrench camera control from your grasp sometimes – in order to highlight something specific – and that too can be annoying.

But you what? The requisite strategy is there. You’ll be able to achieve your objective in a variety of ways, via the likes of infantry, heavy armored tanks, airstrikes, and of course, ruses. You have to take the environment into account, too, as you can hide behind obstacles and buildings, and use your eagle-eye view to appropriately arrange any “anti” units at your disposal. You can even use radio silence to sneak all sorts of units into ambush situations, and you just gotta love the Terror ruse, which causes enemy units to “Rout” faster than normal. When a unit is Routed, it responds more slowly and becomes incapable of attacking; it’s just one of the many basics of battle. Basic control is simple: you can zoom in and out with ease (and it doesn’t hinder the game at all), there’s always plenty going on so there’s little chance of growing bored, maps are divided into segments where ruses become usable, and selecting and directing a unit is as easy as aiming with the left analog and pressing the X or Square (Select All) button.

The ruses are just really cool, if I haven’t mentioned it already. These special little trump cards can completely shift the momentum, and you always have to look around for good opportunities. Sure, the upgrading aspect isn’t as deep as some avid strategy followers might’ve hoped, but between the terrain impact, ruses, battlefield size and overall activity, and modes other than Campaign, the game offers plenty of longevity. Another big bonus is its accessibility. In addition to the three difficulty options, there is a distinct pick-up-and-play feeling that is often absent in games in this genre. Then, when you go online, you will find a robust and satisfying system that lets you choose between six different nations and compete on maps that support up to four players. The nations have different strengths and although exploring about and general reconnaissance is always crucial, the nation distinction adds variety.

It really is too bad that the Campaign has to fall so far short of expectations. If they had only managed to refine that entire mode, and allow us to dive into the nuts and bolts of the game earlier, R.U.S.E. could’ve been a great – perhaps even an elite-level – RTS. As it stands, though, it’s probably still a good option for strategy buffs; the depth really is there, despite a few limitations and drawbacks, and the different ways one can view the action, along with those ruses, make the game enjoyable. By the way, the vision changes are attributed to IrisZoom, a technology that “offers an intuitive interface that allows for smooth, rapid transitions from a bird’s-eye view of the entire conflict, down into the heat of the battle and vice versa.” It’s not a bad idea at all. We just needed more in the way of polish; more attention paid to the technicals and most certainly to the single-player campaign experience.

Even so, R.U.S.E. often succeeds where it counts.  Not a bad option for strategy lovers.

9/15/2010 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (26 posts)

Killa Tequilla
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:15:06 PM
Reply

Can I get a reply?

Agree with this comment 3 up, 7 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:25:15 PM

to what?

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:40:08 PM

Fu@K OFF :)

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

DazeOfWar
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:51:56 PM

@Limited: lol. killed me.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:25:43 PM
Reply

Didn't even know this was RTS, which means I have to pass because I'm not into that anymore.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:42:37 PM

Ya...you're into 10hit combos and progressing through hell. You're missing out man, SC2 is more of the same but has very impressive gameplay.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Geobaldi
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 11:21:12 PM

And the most gorgeous cutscenes seen to date. Just waiting for the Zerg expansion next year.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 12:41:15 AM

666 hit combos to be precise ;)

and RTS is over.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 12:50:41 AM

It is not!


I've been watching TGS, ICO and SOTC are going to be in HD and 3D! and Last Guardian has a Holiday 2011 release date.

Booyah!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Simcoe
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:28:08 PM
Reply

I tried the demo, enjoyed it, and debated buying it, but I really have to stick with RTS games on the computer, where a mouse and keyboard come in handy. Why don't developers give PS3 users the opportunity to use either the controller or mouse and keyboard?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:36:21 PM

I don't see why that can't be in a firmware update, I'd never use it but it would make lots of fans happy.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shadow2222
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 6:43:04 AM

That doesn't even require a firmware update. Unreal Tournament 3 (on PS3) let you play with a mouse and keyboard.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Simcoe
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 10:00:52 AM

True. UT3 is the only PS3 game that I'm aware of where you can use a keyboard and mouse.
Anyone know of any others?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:41:39 PM
Reply

Glad to see consoles getting a taste of what an RTS has to offer, the genre is not dead!

I'm surprised you even reviewed this game Ben, you must be starving for some RTS fun. Did you by any chance get/play StarCraft2?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:48:12 PM

Sorry, it really isn't my thing. Never has been. I've always been about turn-based strat/RPGs like FFT, Front Mission, etc.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

frylock25
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 @ 10:55:43 PM

ive been playing a few hours of starcraft 2 so far on a trial key a buddy gave me. ive got a brand new computer with pretty good specs and it eats my computer alive and sh1ts it out. have to play on mostly low settings. the cutscenes are pretty cool (maybe kotex will sell them to me later) but i just didnt fall in love with it.

i dont think i will pick it up though i dont like a lot of the things about it such as not owning the game. it was fun for 7 hours.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 9:05:15 AM

Hey Ben, did you ever play the Dynasty Warriors Tactics 2 game on PS1? I really liked that one.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 10:16:12 AM

Nah. Again, not my thing.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

coverton341
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 10:53:11 AM

SC2 is the awesome. Once I finish going through ME2 with the new DLC on the PC I am going back to SC2 and finishing it up. What expansions are planned for SC2?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 11:14:30 AM

coverton,

Well there are 2 more full campaigns to be released: Heart of the Swarm and Legacy of the Void. Both are said to be priced as expansions.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

coverton341
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 1:03:10 PM

Awesome news LV thanks.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 3:55:28 PM

btw my username in SC2 is Payson if anyone wants to add me.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Pyramid
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 6:10:45 AM
Reply

@Simcoe : When i DL the demo too the Move controller was enable to use it.Try...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Simcoe
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 10:09:25 AM

Yes, I saw that. IF I end up getting Move (which I am more and more leaning to now that the Heavy Rain patch will be out next week) I will no doubt give it another shot.

My only problem is that time flies (for me anyways) when I play RTS games, I'll start playing at 9 pm and the next thing I know it's 3 am. They've cost me a lot of sleep over the years, so I purposely try not to buy them anymore.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Axe99
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 6:52:05 AM
Reply

Good review Ben. I'm only eight missions into the story, but while the acting is lamer than a cheap sitcom, the actual battles involve more attention to detail than your average RTS. Often the units are named as they actually were in the actual order of battle for the actual conflict.

The way the units work together in combat I is what really distinguishes RUSE from other more 'standard' (a la, drawing heavily from the Dune 2 model, almost 20 years on) RTS' like Starcraft 2, C&C 3, C&C:RA 3 and so on for me (these games are still fun, but they're very much 'strategy lite' - whereas the way RUSE plays (at least early in the campaign, but I can only see this getting developed further), it's far more about actual strategy, than exploiting whatever resource is near the base as quickly as possible to tank rush an opponent (which is _just_ strategic, but in many cases 'RTS' games are actually about quick mouse clicks more than strategy)).

The only thing you didn't mention was Move support. I'm going to give it a good shake (boom boom) tomorrow morning, and depending how it works, it could really help the way strategy games work on console (Under Siege is another strategy/tactics title coming soon with Move support - I'm like a pig in mud :) All we need now is Civ 5, a Total War and a good 'Paradox-style' strategy game, and maybe a Galactic Civilizations, and I'll be happy :) Yes, I've played 'em all on PC, but I prefer console by a fair margin).

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JackC8
Thursday, September 16, 2010 @ 7:34:08 AM
Reply

Looks kind of interesting. Though with the skimpy single-player campaign, it'll probably be one of those that sits on the wishlist until the price comes down substantially.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Did Advanced Warfare save Call of Duty?
Yes, CoD is back on track!
Possibly; it was a positive step.
The jury's still out...
No, CoD is still doomed.

Previous Poll Results