PS3 Reviews: Dead Rising 2: Off the Record Review

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Dead Rising 2: Off the Record Review

More Game Info (Print This Article)

Graphics:

 

6.5

Gameplay:

 

6.2

Sound:

 

6.7

Control:

 

6.0

Replay Value:

 

6.1

Online Gameplay:

 

6.3

Overall Rating:       6.3

 

 

Publisher:

Capcom

Developer:

Capcom Vancouver

Number Of Players:

1-2

Genre:

Action

Release Date:

October 11, 2011

I don’t mind revisiting fun games that have received updates, upgrades, and improvements. I do, however, question a publisher’s decision to reissue an average game with little in the way of significant enhancements. Dead Rising 2 was entertaining, but it was definitely flawed and there was plenty of room for improvement. Therefore, when I sat down to play Dead Rising 2: Off the Record, I fully expected a better experience the whole way ‘round. I was kinda disappointed.

I’m fairly certain they didn’t really beef up the graphics, as they’re basically the same. There’s plenty of great gory detail, especially when you dive into a horde of marauding undead with a particularly nasty weapon. Any massive blunt object or sharply bladed makeshift weapon seems to have the most visceral effect. The environment features some nice ambiance in regards to presenting the player with a frightening atmosphere, but that’s about it. It’s pretty standard; nothing really stands out, especially compared to new productions.

The sound isn’t much better although again, the effects are the highlight. There are some truly gut-wrenching splatter effects involved in group annihilation, and some of the voices are darn good. The return of original protagonist Frank West doesn’t spark much in the way of new dialogue, though; Capcom clearly didn’t implement a whole lot of new reactions to the new character. The soundtrack is decent but often plays second fiddle to those in-your-face effects and overall, it’s an underwhelming audio presentation by today’s standards.

That’s the second time I’ver referred to the current competition, and that’s just because the game is technically a year old, and a lot changes in a year. I also mention it because as I said above, there don’t appear to be much in the way of positive alterations to this pseudo-expansion. For instance, they make a big deal of Frank coming back into the fray but in truth, it really doesn’t change much of anything. The action is basically the same, interacting with other characters is awfully similar, and overall, this just feels like a rehash.

Now, one could make the argument that Frank’s photography ability certainly adds something to the gameplay, and there are a few new psychopath battles. On top of which, the developers tried to address one of DR2’s main failings: the complete lack of a checkpoint system. You had to find a bathroom if you wanted to save, which definitely feels old-fashioned. In Off the Record, they have added checkpoints but they’re only for the sake of death; i.e., if you die, you can restart close to where you died.

However, it’s not technically a save. You still have to find a bathroom if you want to save your game before turning off the system. That’s a little annoying but I will give them credit; they addressed a major issue and, when playing, it does help with the flow of the action. Lastly, the other bonus is the game itself. I still think it can be fun to experiment with all sorts of bizarre, highly destructive weapons, and blasting through the brain-eaters remains entertaining for most of the adventure. But it’s just incomplete.

There are still the common frame rate problems when laying into large numbers of enemies, for instance, and in my opinion, there’s a general lack of direction. I assume those who enjoy this repetitive zombie slashing get a big kick out of certain homemade weapons, and the constant drive to survive offers an adrenaline rush. I’ve also heard many praise the game’s encouragement of creativity, and the environment, which can definitely cause your blood pressure to rise. I do understand the positives and pluses; they just don’t do much for me.

That being said, I did have some fun with the Sandbox mode for a while. Basically, it has replaced the Terror is Reality multiplayer mode, and you just go through challenge after challenge (you unlock them as you progress; it feels very campaign-esque). Some are time-based, others require that you take down a certain number of foes as quickly as possible. There’s nothing all that special or fresh about such challenges, but they do offer an alternative to the campaign, which gets tiring. In general, though, there’s a distinct “almost but not quite” sensation.

We weren’t big fans of Dead Rising 2, so it should come as no surprise that we’re not too enthralled with this half-sequel. Off the Record is still fun; there are still plenty of zombies to slay in a million different ways, we finally get checkpoints (even if they aren’t saves), and Sandbox is entertaining. But beyond that, the improvements are few and far between. We still have the same mechanical problems, Frank’s photography skill doesn’t add much, the frame rate issues are still there, and in the end, it’s just “Dead Rising 2+.”

And now, a year later, given what we have hitting store shelves, that just doesn’t cut it.

The Good: Nailing hundreds of zombies is still bloody fun. Weapon creativity is a big bonus. Checkpoints help action flow. Sandbox mode shakes things up.

The Bad: Not much changed with the return of Frank West. Frame rate issues and other small mechanical problems remain. Campaign gets repetitive and tiring. Not enough upgrades to warrant this rerelease.

The Ugly: “$40, Capcom? Really? How’s about half that?”

10/15/2011 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (13 posts)

Jawknee
Saturday, October 15, 2011 @ 10:17:32 PM
Reply

LOL! I wouldn't play this blatent cash grab if Crapcom paid me. Utterly pathetic.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

TheCanadianGuy
Saturday, October 15, 2011 @ 10:43:42 PM

ha! you said it.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Saturday, October 15, 2011 @ 11:11:32 PM
Reply

I kept asking myself What in the world would move Capcom to do this. Were they hoping to recoop lost sales? Was there some huge outrage over the use of a different main character?

Or is this just a clueless dev? Hmmm...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Fabi
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 2:18:06 AM
Reply

I hated this game. I hated the first one, and thought this "looked" better, but nope, it sucked.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Gordo
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 3:39:01 AM
Reply

I don't see the point of this game.

The last one is still pretty current so it's just a blatant money grab in my opinion.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Oxvial
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 4:43:06 AM
Reply

The franchise has potential, sucks they can't do nothing with it.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 10:18:12 AM
Reply

Like Street Fighter 4, Marvel Vs Capcom 3 and Resident Evil, Capcom is just releasing too much of the same thing trying to pass it off as something new.

No Thanks.

Capcom, why not have a little break and focus more of your resources on your new promising IP's like Dragon's Dogma, OR you could give your dev teams more time to create something better than a little update on your games and releasing them on disc nearly full price.

Has Capcom no idea of just how big add-ons can be?!? Are they tied so heavily to the 360 that they can't break the 2 GB or whatever it is limit for arcade titles?!?!

I'm sorry Capcom, but you've lost a lot of respect from a lot of us gamers recently. All you are doing is screaming "cash grab!!" with every one of your sequels or spin-offs.

Ultimate Marvel Vs Capcom 3? Really?!?!

And now DR2: Off the Record as a disc-release? When I first heard of it I thought it was going to be a $15-20 add-on to Dead Rising 2! That would've made a lot more sense. Shows how much sense Capcom really has these days.

It's not all Capcom's fault. If the sheeple support it, than it's their own damn fault for supporting such appalling gaming business practices.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ZenChichiri
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 8:56:13 PM

As for fighting games it's not really the consumers fault at all. I know a lot of people that are competitive with the particular genre and so when Capcom releases a new iteration that's rebalanced and has some additional members to the roster they're pretty much forced into buying it to stay current. It's sad to see Capcom taking advantage of the situation because they know games like SSF4 and UMVC3 will fly off the shelves.

With the fighting genre there are reasons why this well oiled machine will continue to pump out full retail games with seemingly minor changes, but as for their other cash grabs there is no excuse, Off the Record being a prime example.

Last edited by ZenChichiri on 10/16/2011 8:56:23 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

thj_1980
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 11:56:56 AM
Reply

So is this suppose to be an add-on or a seperate game?


Last edited by thj_1980 on 10/16/2011 11:58:53 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LegendaryWolfeh
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 6:56:37 PM

it's a stand-alone

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

AugustoDeItalia
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 12:34:45 PM
Reply

wow, 40$ ?? really ? that's completely absurd

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BikerSaint
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 7:31:50 PM
Reply

I smell a "bargain bin buy" coming pretty darn quick on this one.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Oxvial
Sunday, October 16, 2011 @ 9:07:57 PM

Is funny because is 40 bucks...should of be 20 from the beginning.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Will Advanced Warfare rejuvenate Call of Duty?
Yes, this is just want CoD needed.
I hope so; it looks promising.
I doubt it, but I'm not sure...
No chance; CoD is going down.

Previous Poll Results