PS4 NewsGround Zeroes Hits Native 1080p On PS4, Xbox One Gets 720p - PS4 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Ground Zeroes Hits Native 1080p On PS4, Xbox One Gets 720p

Another multiplatform game that performs better on the PlayStation 4.

Previously, designer Hideo Kojima said Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes looks "slightly better" on Sony's machine and now, Konami has confirmed that in fact, the prelude hits 1080p on the PS4, while it's only 720p on Xbox One.

Both versions, however, will run at a smooth 60 frames per second, so this is a little different. Over the past few months, we've been hearing about PS4 iterations of multiplatform titles running at 60FPS, while the Xbox One versions were only managing about 30. This time, the Xbox One version can't match the PS4 installment in the resolution department. If you're interested, you can check out the compare-and-contrast media over at the publisher's official website.

So, which platform will you be playing Ground Zeroes on?

Related Game(s): Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes

Tags: metal gear solid v ground zeroes, mgsv ground zeroes, ground zeroes resolution

2/17/2014 10:47:42 AM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (48 posts)

Masszt3r
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 11:06:10 AM
Reply

Well, so much for the "power of da cloud".

Agree with this comment 8 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 11:36:05 AM
Reply

Hideo loves the Playstation brand. I'm not surprised he's getting more out of the PS4.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:13:18 PM

It's that split OS on the Bone.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ZettaiSeigi
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:34:47 PM

And the fact that the Xbone actually has lower specs compared to the PS4. MS can downplay that as much as they want but the proof will always be at the pudding - the games.

Last edited by ZettaiSeigi on 2/17/2014 2:35:05 PM

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Akuma07
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 7:52:37 PM

The ESRAM and lower spec GPU are causing the biggest problems for the Xbox One.

But the larger system requirements probably also have an affect.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 11:39:34 AM
Reply

Even when MS does lower the price of the xboxone later this year,then this will also haunt them:multiplatf. games will look better on the ps4,and ps4 has better exclusives.
There was never a real contest and it looks that there will be also no real contest between sony and ms in the near future

Last edited by slow and smart on 2/17/2014 11:40:23 AM

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 11:58:19 AM

Sony also had the better hardware last generation. I just hope Sony ups the marketing this generation. MS schooled them when it came to promoting products and creating a buzz.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:00:15 PM

yeah but they where a whole year late! with the last gen.,and this is now not the case

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:02:58 PM

Being a year late to the party was the least of their issues last generation.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:05:03 PM

there were more issues,but 1 whole year behind was the most important factor and nothing else

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:14:11 PM

BS, total BS. The PS2 was over a year behind the Dreamcast and we all see how that went. I think you're grossly wrong on this.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:19:12 PM

no,you are full of Bs if you think that a whole year does'nt matter and also xbox 360 is not sega dreamcast,yes the marketing does matter but everybody with alittle sense knows that 1 whole year matters the most so i totally disagree with you

Last edited by slow and smart on 2/17/2014 12:20:48 PM

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:38:44 PM

also when time is not the most important factor as you say,then why has the ps3 caught up with xbox360 now finally?
when other issues where more important then ps3 would not have caught up with the 360 after being released a year later.
Dreamcast is another story,between xbox360 and ps3 TIME is the most important factor[also the price was a factor,but not the most important one in this case]

Last edited by slow and smart on 2/17/2014 12:40:42 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:52:39 PM

I never said a whole year didn't matter. I said it was the least of their issues. Learn to read and counter in a correct manner. You're right the 360 isn't the Dreamcast, it didn't have close to the established fanbase Sega had upon the release of the Dreamcast. Thanks for backing my point!

The PS3 has caught up and overtaken the 360 because of all the other reasons that are well known. It's not a sprint so having a one year lead (while very helpful) isn't going to ensure a victory.

Please keep responding, you keep proving me right each time you respond :)

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:09:09 PM

also when time is not the most important factor as you say,then why has the ps3 caught up with xbox360 now finally?
when other issues where more important then ps3 would not have caught up with the 360 after being released a year later.

This is what's all about,i havent seen 1 argument from you that proofs me wrong,so
everythime you proof yourself wrong,keep doing it i have a great time watching your pointles text with no good argument

Last edited by slow and smart on 2/17/2014 1:10:21 PM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:14:11 PM

Better marketing, better games, a lower price, newer models, etc.

"when other issues where more important then ps3 would not have caught up with the 360 after being released a year later."

This statement doesn't make sense. It's impossible for me to reply to this comment.

"This is what's all about,i havent seen 1 argument from you that proofs me wrong,so
everythime you proof yourself wrong,keep doing it i have a great time watching your pointles tekst with no good argument"

One argument? I brought up the Dreamcast/PS2 war to show how flawed your logic was. Your only reply to that statement only helped prove me right. I'm starting to think you're incapable of arguing. Are you above the age of 18? Do you even remember the year 1999? Do you own a jet ski?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:21:41 PM

dreamcast is another story,between the 360 and the ps3 TIME is the most important factor,again no good argument from you that proofs me wrong

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:26:42 PM

"dreamcast is another story"

No it isn't, you just refuse to counter it because you can't.


"between the 360 and the ps3 TIME is the most important factor"

Ya, we're all aware you believe this to be true. I'm waiting for you to show this to be true.


"again no good argument from you that proofs me wrong "

Besides the obvious one you've completely ignored and the rest of the list I made? Yeah, you're right I've yet to "proof" you wrong...smh

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:33:23 PM

Normally everybody knows that TIME is THE factor in ths case,but you think otherwise that's ok,but.......

Again no good arguments from you,only the same pointles text

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:37:16 PM

"Normally everybody knows that TIME is THE factor in ths case,but you think otherwise"

I do? Please show where I've said time isn't a factor. (I know you can't)


"Again no good arguments from you,only the same pointles text"


So this is how the argument is going to flow now? You ignore my valid counters to your point and then reply telling me I don't have a good argument?

Dreamcast/PS2...marketing...newer models...better games...lower prices...


Okay your turn!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:43:16 PM

Learn to read ,i said time is THE factor so that it is the most important factor, if you cant understand this or you dont want to understand this then its your problem not mine

My argument that time is the most important factor stands,and you can't convince that im wrong that's it


Last edited by slow and smart on 2/17/2014 1:43:45 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:58:45 PM

"Learn to read ,i said time is THE factor so that it is the most important factor"

Believe me, you're the last person that should tell someone they need to learn to read. I'm still waiting for you to respond to comments I made over an hour ago. Perhaps if your English wasn't so terrible I'd be able to reply with the level of perfection you demand from your readers but not from yourself.


"if you cant understand this or you dont want to understand this then its your problem not mine"

I fully understand that you believe this to be true. I'm still waiting for you to make it believable for someone else.

"My argument that time is the most important factor stands,and you can't convince that im wrong that's it"

I don't think I could convince you that the Earth is smaller than the Sun. Your argument only stands in your small, narrow-minded head. You should be embarrassed, I hope this isn't how you respond to people in the real world.

BTW Dreamcast/PS2

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

slow and smart
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:10:25 PM

well,this is my last answer to your pointles text with no real arguments[this forum is not to have only text from 2 people who can't convince each other] prof.english
You can't stand the fact that your only real argument is the dreamcast/ps2 situation which doesn''t have to mean that it is the same with the ps3/360 situation.
You're very simpel as a person and can't give good arguments and behave like a little kid
who wants his lolly pop ohhhh, i pitty you you poor little boy,
again no real arguments,time is THE factor between the ps3/360
i let you have the last word,as kids should have so that they can sleep well

Last edited by slow and smart on 2/17/2014 2:13:06 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Xzer0
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:16:55 PM

Chill out dudes. First please explain to me in a logical way for whom and why time was the major factor for last gen console wars?
And before you will answer to me I try to answer for this question myself.
Time was a major factor for MS - the console realeased 1 year before ps3 and they could sell more consoles. Ps3 in logical way would lose this gen, only then TIME would be a major factor for MS, but for Sony it was not. Major factors for ps3 which helped to win last gen race was: hardware stability, lots of exclusive software, disc format(blu-ray), price drops, media capabilities and in the end PS plus subscription(atleast for me it is a major factor). Time is an important thing in all industries, but more important thing in industrie races are patience and ability to be ahead even if you have a one year less than your competitor. MS sold in 7 years atleast 80 mil. xbox360 consoles, Sony sold in 6 years 80,8 mil. ps3 consoles. Those numbers shows that time was not so crucial for both companies, if it was then MS would won last gen, but it didnĀ“t.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:17:37 PM

Dreamcast rulz.

Now, the fact that PS3 was better hardware last gen didn't matter because the damn multiplat games never ran equal to or better than on 360. Now Sony has that edge. The extra year was eventually overcome by great exclusives.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:23:32 PM

"well,this is my last answer to your pointles tekst with no real arguments"

Last answer, when was your first? And again I've made several valid counters to your original point.


"[this forum is not to have only tekst from 2 people who can't conmvince each other]"

I'm fully convinced you're either a very stupid person or the language barrier makes it impossible for you to have a conversation with someone online.


"You can't stand the fact that your only real argument is the dreamcast/ps2 which doesn''t have to mean that it is the same with the ps3/360."

First, that isn't my only argument. I have several others and briefly mentioned them. I keep bringing it up because it's a valid point and I find it irresistibly funny how incapable you are at countering it. Besides, evidently I don't need another argument. It's proven to be too much for you to counter.


"You're very simpel as a person and can't give good arguments and behave like a little kid who wants his lolly pop ohhhh i pitty you poor little boy"

I'd like everyone to read this comment made by you and smile at how ridiculous it is.


"again no real arguments"

Perhaps you've never had an argument before but you don't win them by ignoring someone's points and declaring them to be wrong. It just makes you look stupid and wrong. The fact that we're an hour into this discussion and you've yet to counter the very point you claim to be "no argument" shows how weak you are.


"time is THE factor between the ps3/360"

Proof?


"i let you have the last word"

You're just rambling now so it's not like it matters. You're a fool.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:26:24 PM

Xzer0,

I'm not going to "chill". This guy needs to be put in his place and I'm pretty sure the regulars will find this entertaining.

Besides what better way to get paid on a snowy Monday afternoon than arguing about last gen's console race with a stupid person typing in broken English!

Agree with this comment 3 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 5:25:48 PM

Time was an important factor in holding the PS3's sales back, but it was far from the most important as the fact that they've caught up to the 360 now indicates. The initial price point was, I think, one of Sony's biggest issues. I mean, the PS3 launched at a thousand dollars here in Australia. I know literally two people who picked it up at that price, and I'm one of them. Everyone else that I know with one waited until they were under $600. All the while, the 360s continued to sell at a fair clip because they were cheaper, so that's one thing.

Another was the advertising. Let's be real here, Ads for the PS3 were absolute s**t in the first couple of years. They were confusing and unclear and they simply were not about to inspire or convince anyone to pick up a PS3. That is in America. Here, outside of speciality gaming stores there was none, and even they were dominated by 360 advertising for a long, long time. So there's another issue.

Then the media scare campaign, saying that there were no games and that the PS3 was destined to go the way of the Dreamcast. The games weren't there. The online functionality was subpar and the VAST majority non-exclusives ran much better on the 360 until about 2010 thanks to the PS3's bizarre bespoke architecture. People were aware of that and it was capitalised on by the media and it reinforced the message that the PS3 was not the better choice of console.

The PS3 overcame these issues because Sony realised that they stuffed up and set to rectifying these issues in a major way, regaining the trust of their core audience at the same time. They put out killer exclusives that stood head and shoulders above the competition and helped third parties achieve parity by sharing their tools and technology and know-how with them. The price came down, the advertising, of both the console and its games got better, nullifying that year's gap.

So there you are, Monsieur 'slow and smart', I've conceded the importance of your one year gap, but brought forth a whole range of rational arguments to the contrary using both irrefutable facts and anecdotal evidence.

Meanwhile, you just keep iterating that time is the most important factor when your argument insists that it isn't because the PS3 HAS caught up to the 360's sales. Odd.

And LV, sorry to butt in, but I'm sure you understand that I simply had to. Also, you are absolutely spot on in your assessment of finding it entertaining. :)

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 5:36:09 PM

LOL I'm glad you responded! I enjoy your posts around these parts. And a great response it is. You definitely said things better than I did in this thread. But to be honest I figured the Dreamcast/PS2 comment (which he was unable to counter) was too funny to let go. Plus if he can't even counter my initial argument how could he possibly handle more than one?!

I hope he responds to your post because you made several great points and worded it in a very clear manner.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Akuma07
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 8:00:54 PM

@LV

"I'm not going to "chill". This guy needs to be put in his place"

Unfortunately this is the internet. And until virtual police are an actual thing, this kind of behavior is just inflammatory and kind of stupid.

I mean you can't really put someone in their place, you will just argue and argue until one person gives up.

I have spent large amounts of time trying to correct stupid people, and "put them in their place" over the past year, especially with the console wars, in the end I learnt one major lesson, 'internet stupid' can never and will never be corrected.

I guess what I am trying to say is, expressing your opinion, and arguing with someone about their opinion are separate from "putting someone in their place". You have no right to even attempt that.

Calling someone out on incorrect facts is fine, but trying to virtually beat someone into submission just because you think your opinion is superior is wrong, just plain wrong.

You have your opinon LV, he has his, try to remember that.

EDIT: Also, if Mr "slow and smart" doesn't wish to argue any other points than the time difference between console releases, then let him go, I mean what is the point of arguing with someone who refuses to listen to your opinion? It is quite literally pointless, and all you do is flame the situation, this community isn't one where we flame the crape out of each, it isn't like that at all.

Last edited by Akuma07 on 2/17/2014 8:04:25 PM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 9:14:05 PM

Akuma07,

Oh come on, I'm an inflammatory kinda person. You act like you're surprised by my comments on this thread. I know I can't literally put someone in their place but I can carry on the conversation and allow them the opportunity to dig themselves a hole.

Don't think for a second I put much thought or effort into this conversation. I already pointed this out to Lawless. I have every right to argue with someone about their opinion. If a person is too weak to do this that's their problem.


I wasn't trying to beat him into submission. Hell, I'd say I did the exact opposite. I just kept stating the same point in the most lazy way and laughing as I read his replies. I think you're looking far too into this. The entire point was that I was bored at work and I welcome people like this guy on internet forums. It's easy peasy and I find it entertaining as do others. I don't expect he will be jumping off a bridge tonight.

I agree that this isn't a community that flames the crap out of each other. I believe I treat everyone with the respect they deserve. Don't I?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lord carlos
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 11:52:29 AM
Reply

the comparison shots between the ps3 and ps4 are great,both versions look stunning.i'll go GZ on ps3 and if there's enough ps4 exclusives out i'll splash out on a ps4 for TTP.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

infamousgodV2_0
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:35:30 PM
Reply

Who really cares, The Sony fanboys will its a win for Sony. but regular gamers well say who cares and just game on.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 5 down Disagree with this comment

LimitedVertigo
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 12:54:42 PM

Well we are on a gaming website so I'd say it matters to those of us that frequent this site. You're an idiot. Why don't you go on ESPN and say the same thing about a random sports related topic.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:14:47 PM

Better performance among consoles should be an issue for all console gamers. It's fine for those who don't care, duh, but most of them are just kidding themselves and would be happier if things were even or better on their end.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Akuma07
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 8:05:52 PM

I didn't know that we had Xbot trolls on this site. How fascinating.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Solid Fantasy
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 1:34:18 PM
Reply

Nice! Can't wait for this one. Supposedly there will be a GZ/PS4 bundle out in Japan. Really hoping it makes it to North America. That would be such a nice way to enter the PS4 world!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 2:14:54 PM
Reply

Burn.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Knightzane
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 3:38:20 PM
Reply

I'll be playing this on the Wii U

wait...

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PC_Max
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 4:55:16 PM
Reply

Makes not difference to me. I won't be buying it since I am not a fan of he series. Although I did play Metal Gear Solid way back, I was not impressed then.

That said, looks good and I do not see much diff between the PS4 version and the XB1. Comes down to if you are one of those people who love to do the comparisons even when they might be subtle.

Keep playing!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Kiryu
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 5:17:20 PM
Reply

Metal Gear Solid V 1080p 60 fps
Ryu Ga Gotoku Ishin 1080p 60fps
Deep Down 1080p 60fps

Japanese Dev's better utilization of PS4.

I'll be playing the Playstation 4 Japanese version of Metal Gear Solid V which now comes with english subtitles.I hope from now on more Japanese games include english subtitles.

Last edited by Kiryu on 2/17/2014 5:27:36 PM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Akuma07
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 8:06:33 PM

You do know that the Japanese and Western versions of MGSV will be exactly the same right?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Kiryu
Tuesday, February 18, 2014 @ 3:54:02 AM

u do know that Japanese voices wont be there in the english version right?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PlatformGamerNZ
Monday, February 17, 2014 @ 6:53:40 PM
Reply

its everything on the XBONE that hinders it from performing

happy gaming =)

Last edited by PlatformGamerNZ on 2/17/2014 6:53:51 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Tuesday, February 18, 2014 @ 3:35:45 AM
Reply

the resolution or frame rate is the least of this games worries!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Alejandro562
Wednesday, February 19, 2014 @ 11:57:26 AM
Reply

wow would anyone pay for a more expensive system that cannot output 1080p and the other does , how is a console next gen when most of its game only hit 720p and its competition hits 1080p

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Alejandro562
Wednesday, February 19, 2014 @ 11:58:31 AM
Reply

60fps and 1080p , and my friend use to say the fps was better on xbox lol

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Kiryu
Wednesday, February 19, 2014 @ 12:11:56 PM
Reply

Welcome to xbot helper, please choose your excuse;

A-) Cloud will make it better.
B-) New patch will make it better.
C-) New SDK will make it easier to develop games running at 1080p.
D-) ESRAM will be utilized soon.
E-) I don't care about graphics, gameplay is more important.
F-) Who cares, we have Titanfall.
G-) I don't see any difference.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

What do you think of the Destiny beta?
It's awesome! Can't wait for September!
It's only good, but I'm having fun.
Eh, it's okay, but I expected more.
It sucks, period.

Previous Poll Results