Why I Don't Care About Backwards Compatibility Anymore
Bear with me here.
When I got the PlayStation 3, backwards compatibility was undoubtedly my most-wanted feature at the time. I got the PS3 at launch (which, by the way, I would never have done had it not been for work purposes) and besides Resistance: Fall of Man, there really wasn't anything I wanted. Plus, I still had a bunch of PS2 games I wanted to play and hell, Final Fantasy XII had just arrived. I didn't want to have both the PS2 and PS3 hooked up at the same time; I was basically out of room, what with the Xbox 360 already taking up one spot in the entertainment center.
But as time went on, the last new PS2 games I wanted to play petered out. It didn't take very long, either. Furthermore and more importantly, something else happened- I found I didn't have much desire to go back and play any games in my PS2 collection. While at the same time, I always have the urge to go back and play some of my PS1 titles. ...but why? On the surface, it shouldn't make any sense. Obviously, going back and playing old games is dictated entirely by nostalgia, and I'm all sorts of nostalgic over certain PS2 titles. So what's the deal? How is this possible? Why, outside of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City and Final Fantasy X, do I just not care about playing my PS2 games?
The answer is clear: Because the PS1 games I want to go back and play - mostly old-school turn-based RPGs - offer experiences I can't really find anymore. Yes, I'm aware I could turn to the PSP at times but I can never fully embrace handheld gaming; it just isn't the same to me. And for whatever reason, the turn-based games I had in my PS2 collection (Suikoden III, Legaia 2: Duel Saga, etc.), just weren't tweaking my nostalgic heartstrings. Maybe it was the unparalleled glory of Squaresoft in those days, or the fact that even games like Twisted Metal 2 and Castlevania: Symphony of the Night are just lodged in my memory banks as being unapproachable.
Thing is, the PS3 just made a lot of what we had on the PS2 better. It wasn't about creating entirely new gameplay experiences; it was just fine-tuning the 3D action experience even more. So why would I want to play the lesser experiences when the gameplay is virtually the same? And when the PS4 gets here, I see more progression but games should play very much the same way they play now. So in looking forward, what reason will I have to go back and play PS3 games? Why? Will I really want to play Uncharted 3 again after playing Uncharted 4 on the PS4? GT5 after playing GT6? Killzone 3 after playing Killzone 4?
I suppose I might want to go back and play Heavy Rain again but beyond that, I can't really think of a game or gameplay style in the PS3 era that won't simply get better in the new generation. That's just how I see it.
Tags: ps4, playstation 4, next generation, backwards compatibility, ps4 bc
9/27/2012 9:51:40 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (30 posts)
556pineapple
Thursday, September 27, 2012 @ 10:51:29 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, September 27, 2012 @ 10:52:31 PM
Reply
Then there's original experiences like Catherine, Heavy Rain and Beyond Two Souls that we will never see the like of again and HD collections of PS2 games like Silent Hill HD that I don't want to be unplayable without hooking up a system.
Then there's that period of drought after a console launch when it's time to shell out for the super cheap experiences from the last generation that you missed out on but want to give a chance.
Also there are still some good JRPGs on PS3 and I fully expect that genre to be dead in the next generation.
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 9/27/2012 10:54:54 PM
ZenChichiri
Thursday, September 27, 2012 @ 11:51:29 PM
It's not high on my priority list, as I can just hook up my other consoles, but it's a nice option to have. If it ups the price of the console considerably just to get the backwards compatibility then I say no, but if they can do it for relatively cheap, they should.
Qubex
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 5:13:47 AM
kay Oss
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 11:15:34 AM
AcHiLLiA
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 11:53:14 AM
telly
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 1:11:28 PM
1torulemall
Thursday, September 27, 2012 @ 11:01:37 PM
Reply
Although i said all the above and think that backward compatibility is not important to me ,it is nice to have a feature like that - as long as we aren't asked to pay some premium price or see some half-assed implementation(see xbox-xbox360).It shows that the company cares for its old console owners and it continue somehow the support to it.
Last edited by 1torulemall on 9/27/2012 11:03:13 PM
BTNwarrior
Thursday, September 27, 2012 @ 11:09:13 PM
Reply
kraygen
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 12:41:36 AM
Reply
Whereas if it's not bc you have to spring for full price games right out of the gate and it's a much larger expense than just the console if want to actually game on it.
Mogreen
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 1:06:07 AM
Reply
BC compatibility is a must in every successor console in my opinion.
Although for PS4 i'd want real ps2 BC because PS3 was really lacking only series I honestly see me going back to is Mass Effect Series and if we never get another true Socom, Socom Confrontation. That's it for PS3.
BikerSaint
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 1:14:16 AM
Reply
Just because once they're gone, their gone....& then you have no other options to get B/C back except to buy it used(& with the chance that it was abused), or an actual refurb(which I have nothing against, almost 1/3 of my consoles, even retro's are refurbs & still kicking it to the max today).
Plus I still hope to buy more PS1 & Ps2 games to play as well(well, that was until I got laid off 16 months ago).
VampDeLeon
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 1:48:11 AM
Reply
That and the space; it would be nice to give my PS2 away with the memory cards to one of my relatives and then I could just save my games off the hard drive rather than continually buy more memory cards. I'm dealing with it though, ever since I upgraded my SDTV to an HDTV (mainly just so I could finally read the in-game text, I'm not into the best graphics). I've been able to plug in my other PlayStations to my older tv and play them on. Yes, even my PS1 since some of my memory cards aren't recognized on the PS2.. plus it's a more nostalgic to see that startup screen. :)
So overall, it's merely a convenience and major space saving to have everything all in one. Plus it would really drive the PlayStation motto of it being able to accomplish everything.
Last edited by VampDeLeon on 9/28/2012 1:52:42 AM
Beamboom
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 4:33:47 AM
Beamboom
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 4:23:06 AM
Reply
One thing is for sure, with the next gen console s I'll be a bit more picky with the titles I buy and *when* I buy them. I'v bought around 150-200 games for the PS3 over the years. Although many of them are sold again (and thus financed purchases of new titles), was it worth it? Not if bought at full price, no most definitely not.
Last edited by Beamboom on 9/28/2012 4:32:12 AM
Ultimadream
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 6:21:47 AM
Reply
For me having a backwards compatible PS2 is essential, quite simple because a PS2 does not support a HDMI, so it looks rubbish on a HDTV. While the PS3 upscales the content to at least look as good as it did on a normal TV,which is all I want. I have bought HD collections of some PS2 games. Playing Metal Gear Solid 2 & 3 in widescreen was so satisfying. But I have over 70 PS2 games many that I play frequently and still some I need to sit down and enjoy.
You said you would go back to play Heavy Rain, what about Quantic Dreams Fahrenheit (or Indigo Prophecy I think it's called in the US) - I personally enjoyed that more than Heavy Rain. If you haven't played it please do. The first two introduction scenes are so well done.
If the PS4, is in 1080P along with all TV's for next next, I will be content with my PS3 to play PS1 and PS2 games, but 2160p (4K resolution) becomes the standard for next gen gaming and I upgrade to it, I will want all of my games through my PS3 too look good on it or I will cant the PS4 to be backwards compatible.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 11:04:41 AM
Amnesiac
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 9:46:23 AM
Reply
So I have 1 game console in my entertainment center instead of 2. And with the PS4 (without it) now I'll have to have 3 consoles. lame.
Besides how optimal at any given time to play your entire PS catalog on one system? Add in additional perks wireless controller and smoother picture, its like owning your own
MOBILE CONTROL UNIT !
That friends is the ultimate Playstation satisfaction.
Last edited by Amnesiac on 9/28/2012 9:47:06 AM
playstation usa
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 10:08:35 AM
Reply
Nynja
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 10:24:36 AM
Reply
I do like the option, but I don't see it as important as it used to be.
Back when this feature was first introduced, there weren't as many games releasing as frequently as they are today. Generally you had long hulls in between launches of great games. Now a days, I can't find the time to finish or even just play all the games on my list.
slugga_status
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 12:04:17 PM
Reply
At the same time though, I'd have a urge to play Red Dead Revolver, San Andreas, DBZ Tenkaichi 2, and lord knows my urges to play the Onimusha series. I have no room in my entertainment center for the PS2. I wish I could just play them on the PS3. I can't imagine not being able to play Uncharted on the PS4 to get ready for Uncharted 4 and the same goes for God of War..and the HD collections I've purchased..It would just seem odd not to have b/c on the PS4..I mean if rumors are true then I know we won't have b/c but if Sony sticks with Cell technology I don't see why it wouldn't have b/c for PS3 games at the minimum..
telly
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 1:06:40 PM
Reply
The problem becomes when a company inexplicably keeps some classics out of the digital stores -- WHY is SE keeping Dragon Quest VIII and FFX to themselves? But those games are few and far between, and it's not like they'll never be released.
Comic Shaman
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 1:24:48 PM
Reply
Plus I would say that there are certain games that have not been improved with new-gen versions. The 2-player co-op games like the old Baldur's Gate & Norrath titles that are still more fun than most of their contemporary counterparts. And the first three SSX games are still more fun than the next-gen iteration, in my opinion.
If my PS3 broke down today, I would do everything I could to get it repaired as opposed to buying a newer slim with no backwards compatibility.
So I hear Ben's point, but I have to weigh in on the other side. Backwards compatibility is a huge selling point for me.
gungrave
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 1:41:19 PM
Reply
Besides, it's like having a movie collection. You may watch the latest movie out but that doesn't mean you won't go back to watch the classics. Backwards compatability is very important to me. That, and the FF13 "exclusive", was what sold me on the ps3. Now both are gone lol. Happy I have my og PS3 60gb Fatty. :) best system ever....along with a hacked PSP-EMULATORS!
Axe99
Friday, September 28, 2012 @ 3:03:39 PM
Reply
You're spot on that in terms of shooters (although there are still original games like XIII, Second Sight and the excellent Timesplitters), racers (generally, although purist rally games have taken a step back this gen) and flight games that this gen has surpassed them, but there are still exceptions. There hasn't been a single online military third-person shooter this gen that matches the single-player of the SOCOM series (or, arguably, the online) - hell, even the two Op Flash games weren't as authentic (although they were still great). And Rez, Rez was great :).
That said, I just rock a spare super-slim PS2 these days, now that my original fat PS3 has gone to Playstation heaven. I'm hoping that they can handle B/C for PS4, but suspect that with the unique architecture of the PS3, and all the rumours of going with a more standard x86 chipset for PS4, they might find it tricky. But it's a hope, not a dealbreaker - worst comes to worst I'll just keep the 'ole PS3 in a readily accessible location.

See Full Image









Killa Tequilla
Reply
Thursday, September 27, 2012 @ 10:47:07 PM