What Comes First? PS4 Or Xbox 720?
It's definitely intriguing, but the idea of the new PlayStation and Xbox hitting the shelves at about the same time seems like a pipe dream.
And in fact, we have some evidence that only one next-gen console will launch in 2013. GameStop CEO Paul Raines has clearly stated that his company expects to see a new system in 2013 and another in 2014. And most recently, Activision CEO Bobby Kotick dropped a significant hint - depending on how you interpret his comment - that only one new console is set for next year.
So that begs the obvious question: Which is it? The PS4 (or Orbis) or Xbox 720? We had heard that Microsoft ran into some manufacturing issues with their new machine, which supposedly pushed back their intended launch. On the other hand, we've heard absolutely nothing concerning a potential release date for Sony's next console, although a few rumored details have leaked out. Logically, it seems the Xbox should come next, as it has been around for a year longer than the PS3 and Microsoft quite simply needs the tech boost. At the same time, developers have been saying that the PS3 could offer a lot more.
Plus, there are still top-notch PS3 exclusives scheduled for the future (Beyond: Two Souls, The Last Of Us, God of War: Ascension) and given Sony's financial position, it seems unlikely they'd want to rush into a new generation. A new console just means heavy losses for a few more years to start out, yes? They also may want to focus on getting the Vita rolling. As for Microsoft, I don't see much that would stop them from launching next year, unless that manufacturing glitch was disastrous enough. Personally, I'm going with the Xbox 720 (or whatever they end up calling it); it just appears to be far more likely. But what do you say?
Tags: next gen, next generation, ps4, playstation 4, xbox 720, orbis
11/10/2012 10:37:44 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (43 posts)
stay3r1337
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 11:44:27 PM
Beamboom
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 6:02:52 AM
firesoul453
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 9:53:23 PM
manofchao5
Monday, November 12, 2012 @ 3:56:08 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 11:24:13 AM
Reply
Lord carlos
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 11:40:21 AM
Reply
LaasYaNir
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 12:20:49 PM
Cole
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 12:23:53 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 12:56:26 PM
Temjin001
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 1:12:26 PM
Yah so i told myself id hold off on Halo 4 until after the school quarter but after class yesterday I drove home and saw my wife had a bunch of moms over with their kids and I was like, "crap, not going in there" so I kept on driving and tried to figure out what to do in a boring college town until the moms and kids were gone. I decided to go to the happening Safeway strip center and hit up Blockbuster in hopes to rent Halo 4.. It was fate ;)
Well, all 28 copies were rented out. Feeling bummed a NEW shiney copy of Uncharted 3 was there for $20. I thought, " yah, I actually feel like doing some Uncharted." I bought it, and that concludes the story of my yesterday..... =p
Last edited by Temjin001 on 11/10/2012 1:13:50 PM
telly
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 1:11:49 PM
Reply
Ignitus
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 3:57:47 PM
Knightzane
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 2:06:07 PM
Reply
Leafs25
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 2:36:00 PM
Reply
That is the type of comment I'd expect from someone who is a complete troll.
Bottom line is that both the xbox and ps3 are outdated systems and the current up to date PC destroys both in terms of power, graphics. The Ps3 is great but obviously cannot give a significant increase in performance of what we have already seen. That just isn't my opinion that is hardware limitation for ya. Next Gen cannot come fast enough for me.
Last edited by Leafs25 on 11/10/2012 2:37:22 PM
bigrailer19
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 8:48:42 PM
That quote, is indeed correct. Sure the 360 has some good looking games but nothing that continually advances. It's hit a wall, that's obvious from the past couple years. But that isnt talking bad about the system, I mean it's been out for around 7 years, it's dated.
Fortunately for the PS3 there is continually improvement.
Last edited by bigrailer19 on 11/10/2012 8:51:07 PM
___________
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 2:39:15 AM
the 360 has seen gradual upgrades each title just like the ps3 has.
especially now with halo 4 god that was a kick in the balls!
just the second level when you walk out and see the ring, reminds me of the original.
cry, so beautiful.
or even all the space stations as you look out into space and see all the ships floating past.
just the pure scale of the game is jaw dropping!
bigrailer19
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 8:40:26 PM
So sure maybe Halo 4 does look great, and that's awesome, I'm glad that even without Bungie at the helm another developer can step up and please the fans.
But let's be honest here... The 360 is producing games of - not bad quality - just lesser quality. I'll admit though even after I said I wast interested in Halo 4, just knowin how much I enjoyed the first Halo makes me want to play Halo 4. It looks good!
Last edited by bigrailer19 on 11/11/2012 8:51:21 PM
___________
Monday, November 12, 2012 @ 7:48:33 AM
when you think about it every single "flag holder" $ony has is extremely restricted in what it does.
uncharted is linear as hell, and has few special effects, particle effects, the lighting engine is not as good as say BF3, or other games, sparks flying off metal when you shoot it, no destructible environments.
AIs not the best either.
pretty much same goes for KZ, and every other game.
they do 1 thing incredibly well, and forget everything else.
MP games, and a few 360 exclusives alan wake and halo 4 especially, do everything.
ps3 gets a 10 because of one category done so well, but MP and others get 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 9 because all of the catagories are done so well.
in short its better to have a game that does many things well but nothing perfectly, than have a game that does 1 thing perfectly and nothing well everything else is meh.
theres heaps of MP games out there that have done everything, physics, destructible environments, particle effects, lighting, AI, scale, everything much better than uncharted has, AND they have just as good graphics.
halo 4 has everything, AND it does it either better or just as good as weve ever seen from consoles this gen!
scale, texture detail, physics, lighting engine, particle effects, AI, open levels, EVERYTHING was perfect!
having infinity crash in front of your face and seeing all the dirt flying into the atmosphere and seeing the dydact or whatever its called, in the distance escaping is just jaw dropping!
uncharted has nothing in such a large distance scale such as that.
and halo 4 is chock full of em!
Last edited by ___________ on 11/12/2012 8:11:12 AM
JROD0823
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 2:37:09 PM
Reply
Not that I particularly care, unless they performed some form of black magic where online play was free and equal across the board and games sold for $5 a piece, I'll be sticking with Sony.
bigrailer19
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 3:07:30 PM
Reply
Here's where my theory gets a little interesting though. Aside from pushing FPS games, MS has completely adjusted their advertising to not games, but Kinect. Everything "is better with Kinect" (although, only the voice recognition is getting any praise), nothing is being advertised as "better on the xbox360". I truly believe they are aiming for Nintendos market, and that would be good for them of they took some of that market. But they may lose some of their consumers in doing so. I truly think they are so obsessed with the motion side of gaming they may end up competing for that market. That's where it's good for Sony.
Otherwise Sony needs to come out swinging. It's ok if the PS4 releases a little later (not too much) if the launch games are awesome. They still need to release that thing within a reasonable time frame though.
Last edited by bigrailer19 on 11/10/2012 3:08:11 PM
Beamboom
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 3:35:29 PM
Reply
The very thought of having to sit there and wait month after month while watching the goodies rain on the newly launched Xbox will be pure torture. Torture, I say!
Last edited by Beamboom on 11/10/2012 3:37:51 PM
bigrailer19
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 8:54:52 PM
Now we've got sort of the same situation here (assuming the 720 releases in 2013), with The Last of Us and Beyond: Two Souls and, possibly The Last Guardian All still to be released.
Beamboom
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 6:07:23 AM
But I wish they all were made for the PS4 instead. I would not mind one tiny bit if Far Cry 3 was the last title released for the current gen consoles.
Last edited by Beamboom on 11/11/2012 6:17:32 AM
karneli lll
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 4:31:11 PM
Reply
bigrailer19
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 7:10:02 PM
___________
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 2:46:18 AM
Reply
weve had equal leaked information from each parties, maybe a little more from M$ with the recent document detailing how they intend to incorporate a new type of kinect.
but its been pretty even so its really anyones race.
if i had to bet id go with the next xbox simply because M$ have commented on it, albeit acting dumb, at least they have commented on it.
$ony just churns out the usual we dont comment on rumor and speculation line.
the documentation looks more real, the leaks about it seem less outlandish, and theres been allot of rumors about its next gen titles.
hell, 343 just put a job listing up for the next halo game stating development on a future console.
same with cryteks ryse, it just seems too coincidental that its been announced for 2 years and they have not said boo!
ever since it was announced there were rumors it was a next gen title, now its really starting to look that way.
so yea id have to go with the xbox scraping in a little earlier simply because theres slightly more to go off, and what there is seems a little more likely.
there in a MUCH better financial position than $ony too!
ulsterscot
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 3:59:00 AM
Reply
Beamboom
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 6:17:54 AM
bigrailer19
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 8:42:40 PM
Caanimal
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 1:42:58 PM
Reply
My personal guess, one system will release at Xmas '13 w/ the other one 1st quarter '14. Although I wouldn't mind seeing releases being pushed back a year...
DjEezzy
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 1:57:48 PM
Reply
Last edited by DjEezzy on 11/11/2012 1:59:00 PM
Id00urmomma
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 2:16:02 PM
Reply
PHOENIXZERO
Sunday, November 11, 2012 @ 3:34:17 PM
Reply
The only thing to really look at next generation will be exclusives for each platform.
Nynja
Monday, November 12, 2012 @ 3:10:14 PM
Reply
Developers are already receiving the near final version of their dev kits. One rumor suggests Sony will announce PS4 in January/February then debut the console at E3.
Microsoft Xbox 8 - September 2013 -if supply issues resolved / Spring/Fall 2014 -if supply issues not resolved
FYI: The final version PS3 dev kit was in developers hands the same year the PS3 was released. Rumor has it that the final version of the PS4 dev kit will be released to developers in January 2013. Based on previous PS3 release cycles, PS4 is on target for a Fall 2013 release.
Interesting Note: Lots of rumors are pointing to 8GB or 16GB of on board memory for the PS4 dev kits. Normally dev kits include at least double the RAM of the actual console specs for debugging purposes. Early PS3 dev kits were reported to have 512MB XDR RAM. In the end, PS3 had a total of 256MB XDR RAM. Could the PS3 really offer 8GB? This could explain the 'conflicting' memory reports form different developers who have their PS4 dev kits already. Some may be reporting what the dev kits have and others could be reporting what is actually available for the games.
Last edited by Nynja on 11/12/2012 3:12:49 PM

See Full Image









dlte
Reply
Saturday, November 10, 2012 @ 11:03:24 AM