PSP2 "As Powerful As PS3," On Store Shelves For Holidays
Oh yes, the PSP2 hype is climbing, and it's climbing fast.
We learned this week that Sony's newest portable offering might be unveiled on January 27 and now, that same source has provided us with some juicy - and perhaps hard to believe - details. It seems the PSP2 will be on store shelves for the holiday season this year and more importantly, we'll be looking at a "high-end portable equivalent of its next-gen home console." Indeed, Sony has told licensees the unit "is as powerful as the PlayStation 3." Sources have also stated that Sony would start outlining its 2011 handheld strategy "within days" of Nintendo revealing their 3DS plans. As it stands now, we might have a super powerful portable device in our hands as early as October, and it'll boast a high-definition screen and twin analog controls. As for the games, Sony is doing everything they can to separate the PSP2 from the Apple and Android handheld devices...well, if the new PSP is as powerful as the PS3, that's separation enough, yes?
Lastly, PSP2 will utilize a media format to insure "retail has a part to play in the console's lifecycle by selling physical software," so the idea of a PSP Go clone seems to be out. Just don't forget the new PSP will certainly be capable of smaller games and apps via the PSN. If you're into handheld gaming, this news should be quite exciting and if the sources are correct, we'll have all the relevant info in only two weeks time. Stay tuned.
Tags: psp, psp2, playstation portable, psp2 launch date
1/13/2011 10:45:12 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (120 posts)
natho86
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:15:41 PM
manofchao5
Monday, January 17, 2011 @ 2:40:41 AM
GuernicaReborn
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:12:55 AM
Reply
kraygen
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:02:55 PM
Simcoe
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:47:51 PM
GuernicaReborn
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:50:46 PM
gumbi
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:12:55 PM
Fane1024
Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 3:25:30 PM
Highlander
Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 3:31:36 PM
godsman
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:24:05 AM
coverton341
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:27:27 AM
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:32:11 AM
coverton341
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:45:00 AM
Hopefully, but I wouldn't set my watch to it. Their PCs, TVs, and audio equipment is still ahead of anything else at time of release and the price indicates it.
Sony products really are for a higher bracket of earners at launch. Just look at the PSP Go. Even though that was a release disaster those things are still $200 new.
Anyway, I really hope they have a decent price point at launch, but again I'm not holding my breath
aaronisbla
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:47:17 PM
spiderboi
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:20:50 PM
godsman
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:19:29 AM
Reply
One reason I don't play PSP games on my HDTV is because it's ugly. If PSP2 can have some decent graphics, I might hook it up to the TV and interchange with my PS3.
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:26:08 AM
godsman
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:37:09 AM
Jawknee
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:00:32 PM
Looking Glass
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:13:07 PM
Simcoe
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:54:17 PM
Shams
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 2:16:21 PM
Anyway, I know not to read to deep in pre-announcement/release media and hype...like the PSP be being just as powerful as the PS2...or the PS2 having the ability to do Toy Story like graphics with the emotion engine. What eventually does get me excited, more so than vaunted tech prowess and specs, are the Sony exclusives that eventually come out.
kraygen
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:04:19 PM
Jawknee
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:59:20 AM
Reply
Jawknee
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:36:04 PM
Simcoe
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:58:33 PM
Shams
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 2:25:49 PM
Qubex
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 12:27:52 AM
..BUT... I am more sensitive to the hype than ever now...
Q!
"play.experience.enjoy"
Highlander
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:18:48 PM
The reason being that the PS2's GS chip does things differently from all other GPUs and has a monster amount of internal data bandwidth. No current GPUs have been able to match that in a way that allows emulation.
big6
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:02:39 PM
Reply
The statement that the PSP2 is "as powerful as the PS3" is speaking on relative terms.
Because the screen on the PSP2 is so small, they don't need to push true 1920x1080p resolutions to get a "hi-def" look. Thus, they will be able to scale down everything and still maintain a decent framerate.
As for the media, don't expect another UMD-type disc. I fully expect them to utilize a form of SSD for their physical media. It will be lightning fast and use less power.
But as Coverton said above... don't expect the price to be cheap. Bleeding-edge hardware comes at a cost.
monkeypunch
Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 11:51:19 AM
And with all the advances in mobile devices components sizes have been reduced significantly. Mobile phones as slim as half an inch have 1.2GHz dual core processors with 1GB Memory, 16 to 32GB internal Flash Memory (Flash is the same as SSD), NVidia Tegra GPU's.
There hasn't been a mobile gaming device created with current technology. Everything so far has been dual purpose. The mobile phone devices are not going to put the fastest mobile GPU in their hardware because they have to balance cost with features.
What I'm saying is it's not impossible or far fetched. They could make a mobile gaming device 100x faster than a PS3 but there are many reasons they don't.
A couple of reasons,
• cost - Sony has to keep the price to a price the market can bear. You can have that PS3x100 but then you have Neo Geo x 10. For you padawan learners the NeoGeo was a sweet ass console that had arcade level graphics and controls. The problem was that the console cost $600 and the games $200. So console makers have to choose between using existing components which are lower cost or using creating custom components which are higher cost. The advantage of the custom components as you know are they can take advantage of all the latest technological breakthroughs. Also the cost of using the latest technology can include licensing costs.
Anyway, you can still pick CPUs and GPUs off the shelf and do alright. The 360 went that route.
• battery - everyone knows this. The more power you draw the more power you draw. The PSP2 can be as powerful as the PS3 but it doesn't mean it will use all of the power it has available. It's not unusual to set a max limit on the clock cycles. They did this with PSP1. And what's more, the next generation of mobile gaming devices will benefit from components optimized for low power environments. Look at the Laptops that came out in the last year. They went from 2 to 4 hrs battery to 6 to 8hrs. 2 to 3x longer in some cases.
The argument that it's a smaller screen so there's less to render is misleading. Modern mobile device screens have a much higher pixel density. You're laptop or desktop display has 72 dots per inch (DPI). A modern mobile phone has around 240 pixels per inch (PPI). To over simplify it to render an inch of screen real estate on your computer monitor you would need to control 72 x 72 or 5,184 pixels. To do the same on the phone display you'd need to control 240x240 or 57,600 pixels!!! There's definitely a lot going on in the GPU! Don't mistake a small screen size to mean less pixels. In the end it's the hardware and software that determine the resolution and more importantly what's rendered on the screen.
Last edited by monkeypunch on 1/16/2011 12:01:14 PM
Highlander
Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 3:02:04 PM
Nope, no one is forgetting anything, but I think what *you* are forgetting is that in the first year of the PS3's life, the CellBE chips that power it were still not achieving good production yields because they were so darned new - barely past engineering samples. The decision to allow the use of substandard Cells by reducing the active SPE count to 7 proves that point - it allowed a far higher % of Cells coming off the production line to be used since any Cell with only one faulty SPU could be used. The Blue LEDs used for the BluRay drive were in very early production, barely past the engineering sampling stage too. The XDR Rambus memory was brand new and essentially untried, and still offers bandwidth that other memory can't. The system will be 5 in November, and probably existed for another year before that. Prior to that, only exotically engineered dev kits existed even inside Sony as technology demonstrators. The PS3 is at very most 6 years old at this point, even including the early tech demonstrations.
Quite apart from anything else you are vastly overstating the ability of mobile SoC processors. Even Tegra3 4 Core A9 (ARM) will have only 4 cores plus the mobile Geforce 8/9 GPU. Even though the ARM cores are dual issue, this still does not come close to matching up core for core with the CellBE itself. The mobile Geforce GPU will more or less match the RSX in most respects, it's still a mobile part, not a desktop one, there are compromises made. But comparing 4 dual issue ARM cores against the CellBE isn't a fair comparison, not to mention the fact that the CellBE's SPEs are specifically tuned to be excellent floating point engines. Let's not neglect the clock speeds, the CellBE runs at 3.2GHz, the Tegra will run at between 1GHz and 1.5GHz at most. Cycle for Cycle, Cell will always be more powerful. FLOP for FLOP the CEll will always be far more powerful. Combine all of that and I'm sorry, but there's no way to assert that a Tegra3 (or Tegra2) powered system will be a match for a PS3. That's simply not a reasonable argument.
None of that means that a PSP2 based on a TEgra3 (or whatever) wouldn;t be very powerful, and as I've pointed out before, most non-1st party games have made poor, or no use of the Cell's SPEs. For games of that kind, a PSP2 based on a 4 core 1+GHz SoC with a GeForce 8/9 GPU would be a match. But against anything that capitalizes on the SPEs in the SP3, there's no comparison at all.
FullmetalX10
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:03:54 PM
Reply
As powerful as the PS3 o.O
High-def screen
Physical media
*Jizz in my pants*
No but seriously, if they can pull that off and convince me to make a day one purchase with some awesome new games, I won't really mind a 300$ price tag. I might have to rethink that statement though, with all them games coming out, I'm already broke -_-
Fane1024
Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 3:31:55 PM
Lawless SXE
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:30:42 PM
kraygen
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:28:58 PM
Jawknee
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 3:20:31 PM
SolidFantasy
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:18:55 PM
Jawknee
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:19:50 PM
SolidFantasy
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:19:51 PM
Reply
556pineapple
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:33:24 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:38:16 PM
556pineapple
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:39:29 PM
BTNwarrior
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:22:09 PM
Shams
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 2:28:23 PM
Highlander
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:16:51 PM
Beamboom
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:41:34 PM
The case, if it holds any truth at all, must be that a specific *part* of the machinery match ps3 spec. Like the r/w speed of the memory, the framerate (without taking resolution into account) or something along those lines.
I'd be careful with hyping the psp2 *too* much, or it will risk to disappoint no matter how good it actually is.
That it's gonna be the new king of the handheld hill however, now *thats* something Im willing to bet on.
Jawknee
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 7:31:42 PM
Lawless SXE
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:33:25 PM
Reply
Peace.
GuernicaReborn
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 12:53:43 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:11:55 PM
Reply
GuernicaReborn
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:15:27 PM
gumbi
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:22:18 PM
DjEezzy
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:23:05 PM
Reply
gumbi
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:26:25 PM
Reply
And HDMI out would be a must have for a device boasting specs like this.
I guess this more or less dashes my hopes of a $250 launch price. I'm thinking more like $400 or $500 if this thing is as beastly as it's sounding. Oh well, sounds badass! I'll pinch some pennies for it.
Highlander
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:17:43 PM
gumbi
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 8:10:45 AM
For now, I shall continue the waiting game.
Pandacastro
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 1:26:48 PM
Reply
tridon
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 2:43:05 PM
kraygen
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 6:19:06 AM
tridon
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 2:41:12 PM
spiderboi
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 9:40:24 PM
spiderboi
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:37:34 PM
tridon
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 2:39:39 PM
Reply
Amazingskillz
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 2:56:34 PM
Reply
Highlander
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:18:33 PM
sha4dowknight05
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:03:59 PM
Reply
Highlander
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:19:02 PM
Highlander
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:49:15 PM
Reply
With all the rumors and such, it's hard to tell what's coming. The talk of it being as powerful as a PS3 seems to me to be completely overstating the situation. Here's why; PS3 has 1 PPC core and 6 SPUs running at 3.2GHz. The fastest mobile System on a Chip (SoC) clocks are about 1.5GHz. These high clocked SoCs are dual core. If you go to quad core designs, the clock speeds are typically less than 1GHz. Even just looking at the core count, the PS3 has more cores. Of course it's not just that the PS3 runs at a far higher clock speed than any mobile processor. The PSP2 could conceivable have 4 or more cores, but they will have a far lower clock speed than 3.2GHz. So really there's no way that the PSP can be as powerful as the PS3. Of course if it's a quad core device with a separate mobile GPU, it could certainly put up a good fight, but won't have the power of the SPUs on the PS3. Ah well, hyperbole is all good this early in a product's life.
I think that it will be;
* Quad core CPU with built in GPU - System on a Chip.
* 1GB of RAM ultra low power DDR2
* Memory Stick based ROM format media cards (for retail games and other content)
* Memory Stick XC Flash RAM (this has capacities up to 2TB).
* Dual analogs
* Analog buttons (like DS3)
* Trackpad like touch surface on back
* 5 inch AMOLED screen, 1366x768 resolution.
* BlueTooth
* 3G/4G data ready
* wireless ethernet
* USB 3.0 - micro size port.
* battery life of 4+ hours
* magnetometer, accelerometers, GPS
* 5+ MP Camera with flash.
* Microphone
* Built in sound
Price wise, oh dear. Either Sony takes a bath on these and they come in below $300, or Sony has a slightly insane moment and they arrive priced alongside iPads.
Personally, I think that if they want a higher price, they need to go with a 7-inch touch-screen, at least then they could sell alongside the iPad. The track pad on the back might work well in games, but for using the unit as anything other than a gaming device, a virtual keyboard requires a touch screen.
I don't think Sony will produce an iPad clone though. We may finally see a PSP keyboard accessory.
NoOneSpecial
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 8:24:20 PM
Last edited by NoOneSpecial on 1/13/2011 8:26:44 PM
Highlander
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 10:36:20 PM
Without 3G/4G capability, the device can't be an always on-line device, and I think that when you look at the devices it will compete with (tablets) they are all data capable always on-line devices.
If Amazon can get Kindle to work globally on 5G without a paid data plan included in the cost of a $190 kindle reader, then Sony can surely do something with the PSP2, even if it meant having a monthly PSN service fee for the PSP2 to allow Sony to cover the network costs.
Last edited by Highlander on 1/13/2011 10:36:30 PM
DemonNeno
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:56:29 PM
Having two separate batteries is something I foresee happening here. Creating a shell that'll utilize heat, power and cooling. I've read about concept power sources before and one that intrigued me was capturing human heat to produce energy. Where and how you hold a device will help increase battery life, while obviously increasing held-charge rather than becoming an recharge approach.
If you consider that mobile gaming is very different than any other mobile device, it would make more sense. Phones, for example, have a much smaller contact area and other mobiles like tablet and laptop are even less about holding them. When you have a mobile controller, you are more prone to sweaty palms. This means you're transferring plenty heat, unlike other forms of mobiles.
Secondly, twin batteries. One can full charge while the other full charges and idles until consumption demands more output from the batteries. This, in addition to heat utilization, would enable more power without entirely depleting batteries within a few hours.
I'm not sure that any form of cpu in an mobile device can touch the ps3, but I can see AMD having some involvement with their APU idea.. On an small die with practically no transfer lag, north bridges won't play a significant roll and limited inboard ram will reduce heat. In trade, massive on-chip ram will keep resources flowing freely.
Finally, sony has shown support for nintendos Mobile 3d Idea and wouldn't be shocked to see this on the psp2. 780p is the next move. Even a dual core apu with optimized pipelines can impress, but I'd imagine an 1-1.5 ghz quad core being a reality. The benefit would be ati graphics with amd true quad processors.
This, personally would make for an ultimate ps3 ally in the gaming realm. Where ps3 advancements end, psp 2 can cary that torch for Sony. Obviously, even I feel my guess is excessively ambitious, but why not make this fun? I'm not at a loss here if I'm wrong! :)
Highlander
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:16:18 AM
Not sure AMD has a look in on this one, they just don't compete in this space. There is a chipset (Freescale make it IIRC) that is PowerPC based and uses some of the key concepts from Cell as well, but the examples I can find of it all use far too much power. If they did a new spin on that design that cut power consumption considerably, it could easily be the quad core Cell like CPU that has been rumored. Personally, I still think that it's more likely to be the Tegra3. ARM is in millions upon millions upon millions of devices, there is a lot of development expertize with the ARM core. Not to mention that Tegra3 has a full blown mobile version of one of the later Geforce series GPUs which will actually perform better than the one in the PS3. Whatever Sony does pick, I would hope that it will be considerably more powerful that the devices in the phones and mainstream tablets.
Regarding Freescale's processors...they use a lot of power in their default configuration, but....who know, perhaps they could be re-done to use less in a mobile situation? Either way, look up Freescale e5500 and Freescale P5020 on Google, or the entire Freescale SoC line - Freescale QorIQ.
Interestingly, Sony is using words like Qricity, so I find it intriguing that Freescale calls it's Power Architecture based SoC line QorIQ....
Gordo
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 4:59:52 PM
Reply
I get to the shelves in the store and my choice is either God of War III for the PS3 for AU$69 or Ghost of Sparta for the PSP for AU$65.
MGS4 for the PS3 is AU$30 whilst MSG Peace Walker for the PSP is AU$60.
(1 AU$ = 1 US$).
Obviously the vast majority of people will buy the PS3 game as its of vastly better quality, it comes on a Blu Ray, and it also holds some resale value.
I don't see a new PSP2 improving on its predecessor unless Sony makes the games cheaper and more accessable.
The iPhone has proven that people are only willing to pay "a little a lot" for their mobile gaming.
(The PSP PSN store apps are mostly rubbish).
I haven't bought a PSP game since Gran Turismo and that was only when it was cheap at $20.
Lawless SXE
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 1:29:17 AM
___________
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 10:05:48 AM
ps3 games drop very quickly where PSP games dont.
GOW3 and GOW ghost of sparta are more or less the same price which is ridiculous!
most ps3 games release at 100 bucks, most psp games release at 60 or 70 but it does not take long for ps3 games to hit that price.
PSP games on the other hand take a while.
MadPowerBomber
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 5:07:05 PM
Reply
BigBoss4ever
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 5:43:19 PM
Reply
A2K78
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 7:20:48 PM
Reply
Its quite obvious you don't understand how things work ecomocially. If anything you sound excactly those who claimed HDTV wouldn't be expensive because the techology was already in use, yet low and behold HDTV began to take off with high prices
In the case of the PSP2, it won't come cheap especially since its roumored to be as powerful as the PS3.
As I have also said in the previous PSP2 discussion, the current economic climate just doesn't favor it because 1)Sony Corp. is still bleeding tons of cash main from its from TV and playstation business and 2)the yen too strong and given the fact that Sony is an exporter a sub $300-500 portable leaves no room for them to make a profit on something that would be exported. For Sony to continue to take a loss from the PS3 which still bleeding the company and a high-end portable gaming system would kill the company for sure.
Jawknee
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 7:26:43 PM
BTW, time's have changed. You can score and LED 3DTV for less than what people were paying for LCD TV's 2 to 3 years ago. So...yea, I do know what I'm talking about. Seems to me you like to make things up. You always come to this site spitting out statements with no proof to back them up.
Last edited by Jawknee on 1/13/2011 7:29:31 PM
tes37
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 9:10:39 PM
Highlander
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 10:38:43 PM
BikerSaint
Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 2:00:54 AM
And BestBuy has had 2 Mitsubishi 3DTV's, a 50" & and a 55", going for $899. & $999. respectively and this was from last October.
So expect huge price wars as all of the manufacturers have brought their own 3D's out.
A2K78
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 7:21:01 PM
Reply
Its quite obvious you don't understand how things work ecomocially. If anything you sound excactly those who claimed HDTV wouldn't be expensive because the techology was already in use, yet low and behold HDTV began to take off with high prices
In the case of the PSP2, it won't come cheap especially since its roumored to be as powerful as the PS3.
As I have also said in the previous PSP2 discussion, the current economic climate just doesn't favor it because 1)Sony Corp. is still bleeding tons of cash main from its from TV and playstation business and 2)the yen too strong and given the fact that Sony is an exporter a sub $300-500 portable leaves no room for them to make a profit on something that would be exported. For Sony to continue to take a loss from the PS3 which still bleeding the company and a high-end portable gaming system would kill the company for sure.
Highlander
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:01:18 PM
When the original PSP launched at $249.99. Do you know how much a PS2 cost at the time? $179.99. The PSP was $70 more than a PS2 at the time it launched. With inflation and what not, I believe that the price premium for being a 'new' device over and above the 4 year old PS3 is no more than $100. That would put a PSP2 at the most at $400. However they are talking about a Holiday 2011 release. I think that the PS3 may undergo a price reduction of $50 by that time. In which case I don't think that the PSP2 will come in at more than $350. Psychologically People don't want to pay significantly more than the cost of a PS3. However, all the technology in the PSP2 comes with a price tag. From that point of view I think that a $50 differential would be bearable for most launch time buyers. In which case the price will be $300.
If the PS3 doesn't get the $50 reduction I expect, I still think that the PSP2 will hit the streets at $300, simply to match the 3DS.
However, here is something we have to be aware of. iPad. Do you have any idea what an iPad with 16GB of internal storage and WiFi? $499.99. The 3G/4G capable models are another $130-$200 on top of that. But, it only costs Apple $270 to put an iPad together (probably less than that by now). And yet people buy the iPad like it is some kind of Holy relic imbued with the power of God. It's just a tablet computer, nothing more, nothing less.
Now, considering that the PSP2 will be physically smaller than the iPad, people will expect it to be a bit less expensive. But truly, if people are willing to shell out $500/$700 for a glorified PDA, why wouldn't they shell out $300/$400 for a state of the art gaming/media/pad? Sony is pretty much getting shafted before the PSP2 even launches because people are so price conscious when it comes to Sony products. Why? Sony typically makes very high quality products. Does Apple get a free pass because they made the iFawn? of the iPass? That's ridiculous. People need to life the perception filters from their eyes and start looking at this from the point of view of reality.
Even if Sony brings the PSP2 to market at $300 it will more than likely be sold at a loss initially. The PSP2 will include more processor power and at least the same capabilities as those in high end mobiles and the iPad. It could cost much more than the iPad to build - initially. Contrast that with the iPad costing $270 to make and selling for anything up to $500. Sony could easily justify a $400 price tag depending on the configuration of the PSP2, and yet people here and elsewhere will castigate them for doing so, accusing them of gouging customers or forcing technology down our throats. What a load of crap.
Sony's aware of this and will move heaven and earth to get this thing in at a reasonable price, but don't expect them to sell it at a large loss. As usual, people's expectation has them wanting far more for far less than possible, and reacting badly when that expectation is not met.
Last edited by Highlander on 1/13/2011 11:02:00 PM
Qubex
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 12:30:43 AM
___________
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 10:09:45 AM
RebelJD
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 10:19:46 PM
Reply
I can't wait to see all the features it'll come with. This is going to be sweet.
StangMan80
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 10:55:41 PM
Reply
I don't see this being priced low enough to be purchase for me. My PS3 will get all my gaming time this year and a new phone is more important right now.
I am loving the PSP2 but have no idea of what to expect with the PSphone.
___________
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 1:33:44 AM
Reply
no, seriously it is IMPOSSIBLE for a handheld to be as powerful as the PS3!
and they want it to be a phone at the same time?
why not ask it to cook your dinner, collect the washing and wash the car while your at it?
im sorry, but if the PSP2 is as powerful as the ps3 i swear to god ill eat my hat!
seriously, IF you were able to get hardware that could deliver that performance, and IF you were able to get the heat issues solved.
it would have the battery life of a toshiba X500!
which is actually about 30 minutes, no joke i charge my laptop up 100% unplug the cable and 30 or so minutes later its flat.
not to mention the price would be through the roof!
if the ps3 released at 1000 bucks than imagine what this, a smaller more expensive device would cost!
dont forget its suppose to have a HD screen that will add allot to the price, heat, power debacle.
WolfCrimson
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 4:38:05 AM
Reply
CrazyIrishBoy
Friday, January 14, 2011 @ 3:24:07 PM
Reply
baseballdude_ [Administrator]
Saturday, January 15, 2011 @ 3:47:15 PM
Reply
LividFiction
Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 11:48:17 AM
Reply
AbsoluteZer0
Sunday, January 16, 2011 @ 9:10:46 PM
Reply
monkeypunch
Monday, January 31, 2011 @ 2:25:02 PM
Reply

See Full Image









Looking Glass
Reply
Thursday, January 13, 2011 @ 11:10:11 AM