PSP News: E3 2011: Wii U May Inspire Vita/PS3 Connectivity Ideas - PSP News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

E3 2011: Wii U May Inspire Vita/PS3 Connectivity Ideas

Nintendo has revealed their new system - the Wii U - and Sony finds it to be a very interesting product.

SCE Worldwide Studios boss Shuhei Yoshida finds it intriguing, and tells Develop it'll inspire PlayStation Vita developers to "carry out experiments." After saying he was surprised the Wii U "wasn't exactly as it had been rumored," Yoshida talked about how Nintendo's unveiling has prompted some Vita/PlayStation 3 questions:

"Already people are starting to ask about linking Vita and PS3 to do something similar, in terms of using two screens, and having controls on the screen. That's very interesting, and we will have to experiment. Lots of the things that developers of Vita games are doing, as you may have seen, is experimenting with connectivities between Vita and PS3.

The Wipeout [2048] team came up with their cross play ideas, and the other Vita teams have come up with ways of playing with two systems. It's just a matter of time, as we provide the SDKs to developers so they can make use of both PS3 and Vita, and they might come up with something interesting."

Gaming really isn't what it used to be, is it? And it's nice to see manufacturers and hardware developers inspiring others to try new things.

Tags: playstation vita, ps vita, ps3, wii u, nintendo

6/8/2011 10:41:53 AM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (68 posts)

maxpontiac
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 10:50:56 AM
Reply

What I hope for is a GT5 (Spec II perhaps) PS Vita game that can transfer saves between the PS3.

That way, I could continue my climb to level 40!

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Clamedeus
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 10:59:08 AM

Indeed that would be great.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 10:59:09 AM
Reply

Um...OK, before anyone jumps on the Sony is copying Nintendo omnibus, I'd like to point out that the PSP already acts as a companion for the PS3 including remote play. I'd also like to point out that in the early days of PS3, the F1 game that was launched was demonstrated using the PSP as a rear view mirror during game play. the actual feature did not make it to the retail release, but it was demonstrated. I believe that the Polyphony team did something similar with the PSP in the early stages of GT5 as well.

I'll also point outthat using the PSP as a controller for the PS3 and viewing content from the PS3 elsewhere (including across the internet) has been a feature since day *one* - it's called Remote Play. You can even remotely turn on your PS3 from your PSP via the internet.

Vita can only serve to deepen that functionality. I would imagine that Vita can use BlueTooth to act as a PS3 controller - for example.

I simply refuse to start giving credit to nintendo for anything like this since Sony's PS3/PSP combination has had much the same functionality since it arrived.


Last edited by Highlander on 6/8/2011 10:59:17 AM

Agree with this comment 15 up, 10 down Disagree with this comment

VIVIsectVI
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:04:01 AM

I'm not in the 3rd grade so I'm not going to say Sony is copying Nintendo, but the Gameboy Advance and Gamecube connected to each other almost a decade ago.

Agree with this comment 10 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:07:13 AM

Thank you, that actually makes the point. If you want to you can mention other examples too. There was at least one prior example of Sony producing a handheld game product that specifically interfaced with a PlayStation game. The word Tamogochi is coming to mind for some reason.

However, the more advanced capabilities of remote play and control from the handheld - of the console - is what is at issue here.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

VIVIsectVI
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:21:07 AM

The only real issue I see is that remote play is only a fraction of what it could have been. Why can't remote play do something now similar to what the Wii U will be able to do? I've used my PSP to connect Assassin's Creed Bloodlines with Assassin's Creed 2 to transfer weapons and that's pretty much it. It's been very "meh" since it started.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:27:11 AM

Ah, found it. I couldn't remember the name of this thing, but it always reminded me of the Tamogochi craze.

Google the Sony PocketStation. It was a product that linked to the original PlayStation via infrared, or could act as a memory card.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

VIVIsectVI
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:36:53 AM

I have a working PocketStation. I used it for FFVIII (one of the only US games compatible with it). It was definitely innovative for it's time, but no more innovative than the N64 transfer pack that came out around the exact same time.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:46:22 AM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the transfer pack was a way to move game save data between the 64 and the Gameboy. As I'm certain you know, PocketStation has it's own screen and functionality. Of course, that makes it very much like a Gameboy - only without the games.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

VIVIsectVI
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 12:30:20 PM

I compare the two because the Pocketstation is literally terrible. It's essentially an Atari 2600 on a 1" screen. I own it, so I speak from experience.

The transfer pack let you use gameboy games to affect N64 games. Isn't that what the whole topic is about anyway? Connecting a portable device to a console? The transfer pack essentially did that.

The Transfer Pack, GBA>GC, and DS>Wii connectivity are something Nintendo need to improve, and it looks like they're doing that with the Wii U. Sony could still improve now. They've had the technology to do it for a few years.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 1:25:03 PM

No, I don't think it's about being able to port game saves back and forth, PSP games will be doing that soon with the PS3. I though we were talking more about using the handheld device to supplement the Console's capabilities and essentially put the handheld into the game as well. Sony already talked up the ability with vita to be able to start a game on Vita, save to the cloud and continue on PS3, and then save to the cloud and go back to the Vita to carry on. So, they're talking about features other than basic linkage for save files.

I totally get your point about the PocketStation, that's why I said it was "like a Gameboy - only without the games".

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Sancho
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 5:16:12 PM

You know the VMU on the dreamcast wasn't quite as advanced or anything but you could call your plays in football off the VMU so as your friends can't watch your screen. Also some games had mini games that were transferable to the VMU and then you could play them and bring back rewards from playing on it. Also the PSP had some connectivity with the PS2 as well. I don't know how much but I remember playing Madden 06 and it had an option to probably just pull up saved data from your PSP to load your roster or something, but it was connectible.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Aranha
Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 10:36:29 PM

Figured I'd add this one: the Nintendo Powerglove back in '89.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Glove)

I'm not saying Sony stole motion sensing from Nintendo, because there are too many years difference between the PowerGlove and the Move. But I do think Nintendo was ahead of it's time at that moment, and finally found a viable timeframe (our current gen) to release motion sensitive gameplay, considering that Sony had given it a shot in the previous gen with the PS2, and was moderately successful.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Doppel
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:04:45 AM
Reply

The Wii Ugh.

With it's graphics capabilities matching five and six year old consoles, it feels like 2005 all over again.

Agree with this comment 9 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

nilos95
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 2:53:27 PM

Dejavu exactly!
On topic:Whatever...Kojima mentioned this capability back in January and if he works exclusively with PSVita/PS3 it's game over for WiiU(what a lame name)


Last edited by nilos95 on 6/8/2011 2:54:00 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Thursday, June 09, 2011 @ 3:00:44 AM

Have to admit, WiiU is pretty lame... but so is Vita!

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

GuyverLT
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:10:09 AM
Reply

I'm not to keen with them thinking about copying ANOTHER idea from Nintendo and slapping an PS brand on it like they did with move (yes there I said it)

They doing fine with the regular connectivity between the PSV and PS3. I'm satisfied by what they've given us so far.

Last edited by GuyverLT on 6/8/2011 11:13:40 AM

Agree with this comment 4 up, 13 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:19:09 AM

Please. Nothing (and I mean *nothing*) about Move was copied from Nintendo.

The PS2's Eyetoy pioneered motion controls on the current generations of console. There were also motion sensing controllers for the PS2 as well. PS3 formalized the motion controls into the standard controller and Move adds a single element to the mix - the motion tracking ball.

Move, is not a Wii copycat in the least. and don't even get me started about Kinect's supposed innovations such as gestural control or voice commands. The Eyetoy games on PS2 had gesture based control, and you've had voice command capabilities in console games since the PS2 generation. Years prior to the release of Kinect, the PS3 also enabled voice control in games such as SingStar.


Last edited by Highlander on 6/8/2011 11:20:21 AM

Agree with this comment 12 up, 6 down Disagree with this comment

GuyverLT
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:35:48 AM

Please. Nothing (and I mean *nothing*) about Move was copied from Nintendo.

I find that quite laughable they both have the pointer controller thingy you hold in one hand and they both have the other controller to move around the character and stuff the only differences I is that one is black one is white, one has a controller that looks like a tv remote the other looks like some kinda of stick thing with a glowing ball on top.

I don't care what you say, you can sugar coat it all you want , but TO ME move is an exact copycat... a more advance version of what the Wii motion controller does with prettier graphics.

I don't care for this whole motion gaming stuff Sony, MS and Nintendo got going and I never will this is my opinion and how I feel about it.

Agree with this comment 8 up, 7 down Disagree with this comment

SmokeyPSD
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:40:34 AM

The move can hardly be described sometimes as "motion" gaming though. just a great interface to augment what we already have. Like a mouse with no pad. I've loved playing flight control for instance and 1st person games have been tremendously engrossing with it. I'm not moving much at all with them.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

GuyverLT
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:46:35 AM

At the core of it it's still motion gaming?

Don't mean to come off as a bit of a douche that just how I see move I tried it, I've tried the wii and that Kinect thing and I didn't like them. I'm not saying motion gaming is bad or terrible or anything like that, although I might have come off that way.

I just can't get into this new kind of gaming with the motion

Last edited by GuyverLT on 6/8/2011 11:50:02 AM

Agree with this comment 5 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:48:53 AM

So, the fact that you're completely wrong in respect to this is of no consequence to you Guyver? Excellent. Top drawer old man, you continue in your own little world of opinion over fact.

God I hate it when people think that their opinion is somehow more valid than simple fact.

Agree with this comment 9 up, 8 down Disagree with this comment

GuyverLT
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:52:02 AM

OLD MAN????WTF

I'm 21!!!

Agree with this comment 4 up, 6 down Disagree with this comment

GuyverLT
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 12:07:15 PM

God I hate it when people think that their opinion is somehow more valid than simple fact.

And another thing I'm not saying my opinion is more valid than simple fact. I clearly say in all my comments that this is what it is TO ME it is how I feel and again I state that it is MY OPINION.

For so reason you can't seem to understand that.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 5 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 12:10:54 PM

I understand it perfectly Guyver, but your opinion is contrary to fact. and you re-iterated your attitude that your opinion matters more to you than fact when you said this "I clearly say in all my comments that this is what it is TO ME it is how I feel and again I state that it is MY OPINION. "

That's fine Guyver, really, but you really are saying that to you your own opinion matters more than fact.

Agree with this comment 7 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Who_KilledMe
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 4:38:11 PM

If something that was developed years before the wii u was announced, and something that has been in development for a while are each already capable of doing what the wii u can do, what's wrong with implementing it? And besides, this sony guy is saying that people are asking him about it, it is his consumers who are interested, and he says it is really up to the developers of the games. That is what I got out of the article, so how is sony ripping nintendo off? I can see that if sony saw the wii u and then decided, after seeing it, to create the ngp to copy the wii u's controller, then you might have a valid point. But as far as I can tell, the ngp and ps3 are already capable of doing what the wii u does, as well as each being their own product.

But sorry for going off topic, but nintendo consoles have always been a hot kids item. How much are one of these controllers going to cost? It would seem that they would be expensive, leading to abuse of children once one is broken. Nintendo is supporting child abuse! Just kidding, but geeze these controllers might cost as much as a 3ds.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Axe99
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 7:03:19 PM

Sorry Guyver, but you're out of step here (and I'm not surprised you're 21, as that'd explain your relatively limited knowledge of the history of how these things have developed). To give you a bit of a primer, check out:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-the-case-for-playstation-move-article

I'd be very surprised it Sony wasn't at least partly influenced by the Wii nunchuk, but that's not actually the motion side of things - the actual motion control was most definitely pioneered by Sony, it's just that most of the uneducated masses in the gaming world are clueless about it ;).

Agree with this comment 5 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

JMO_INDY
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 9:48:17 PM

I was born the same year the PS1 came out and I was gaming on it when I was 4 in 1998. I grew up playing the PS brand and of course at about the age of 7 I got my first PS2 in 2001. Ever since I've first handily witnessed the innovation of the PS2 and what the EyeToy brought to the table and when I first saw the Wii for the first time I immediatley realized that the Wii had obviously been influenced bye the EyeToy. I could easily say it was DeJaVu when I saw the Kinect for the first time.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LividFiction
Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 11:00:05 AM

As for saying Sony copied the Wiimote, have a look at this patent from 2004: http://www.joystiq.com/2005/10/03/sony-has-its-own-magic-wand-in-the-works/

There's a tech demo Sony showed off in 2001, called Magic Duel, which used a wand that Move resembles, running on PlayStation 2 hardware. Unfortunately I can't find the link, but I remember it was very accurate. I recall reading a PowerPoint presentation from 2000 or 01 about motion control on PlayStation 2 as well; that might actually be on one of my hard drives. If I find it, I'll post it.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SolidFantasy
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:16:22 AM
Reply

I just read this article on develop. I like that site. Not as much as this one, but it's alright.

When I saw the unveiling of the Wii U the first thing that came to my mind was the remote play as well as Invisamals (no spell check on that one).

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Sol
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:21:28 AM
Reply

I'll say. I think this newer technology and innovation will help develop the industry even further, catering to newer demographics without losing the old ones.

I have to say that Wii U was amazing. A true next generation console for Nintendo. Now we just have to see how Micro and Sony will stack up.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

SmokeyPSD
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:42:08 AM

To be honest, I was really underwhelmed, I don't know why. It didn't help that the console itself just looked alittle like a 360 at first glance, and the controller looked like a oversized, uncomfortable vita.

I'm reserving judgement for the games themselves. That's what Nintendo might bring me back with.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Fane1024
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 10:19:07 PM

How will they "stack up"? Pretty well so far, since both companies released comparable hardware over 4 years ago.

No one will need to play catch-up with Nintendo hardware until Nintendo produces hardware that isn't a generation behind the curve (that's both consoles and handhelds BTW).

"A true next generation console for Nintendo." LOL...yeah, if by "next generation", you mean the one that was upcoming in 2005.



Last edited by Fane1024 on 6/8/2011 10:22:23 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SmokeyPSD
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:38:07 AM
Reply

I actually thought the opposite here, When I first saw the Nintendo controller I immediately just thought, it's kindof like the Vita. Only instead the Vita actually goes places with you. Why didn't they just make a normal controller for once and make a similar interconnecting portable, instead of the crappy 3ds.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:50:18 AM

Why didn't they just add some functionality to the DS and 3DS to allow either of them to be used with the Wii and WiiU? Both have wi-fi built in, both could easily communicate with the main console, both could fulfill many of the same tasks as this 'thing'.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Thursday, June 09, 2011 @ 3:08:14 AM

"When I first saw the Nintendo controller I immediately just thought, it's kindof like the Vita"... kind of, but the WiiU control can also use a stylus... don't know if it makes a huge difference when it comes to playing games, navigating on the screen, or drawing/sketching on etc... surely there will be some difference that will be become very apparent when software is released for it.

You know what though... I actually keeping my gaming minimal. I don't want to spend money on these extra items for the console. I just want the traditional controller and some good games.

I won't waste a penny on move, nunchuks, WiiU's etc, magic wands and plastic light-sabers, or anything else for that matter. I am happy with the basics, I get more than enough fun from it...

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

ZettaiSeigi
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:58:09 AM
Reply

I still do not want a controller like the WiiU has. I mean, seriously! I dread the day that a home console from Sony would ship with such controllers. There's a very good reason why the DualShock has been around for as long as it has. I only have one pair of eyes. I don't want to keep switching my attention between my TV and the stupid screen on my controller.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

wiley_kyotee
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 1:41:00 PM

I agree. I want to play and veiw home console games on my large screen HD TV. I do not want to keep taking my eyes off the TV to look at a small screen on the controller. In a way, Nintendo mimicked the DS for a home console, but now the two screens will be feet apart. Not sure how well this will work. Won't know until they show actual games.

I like the idea of sharing saves between the PS3 and PSV like was shown with Ruin.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ZettaiSeigi
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 11:58:22 AM
Reply

I seriously have no idea why my posts keep double-posting sometimes, but I'm just going to use this space to say that the only thing I hope the WiiU would inspire Sony (and other devs) to do is to enable good crossplay between the PS3 and the PSVita.

Last edited by ZettaiSeigi on 6/8/2011 12:02:00 PM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 12:11:34 PM

There's some kind of scripting thing I think. I had that happen for the longest time with Firefox, and made a change (can't remember what) and it stopped.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ZettaiSeigi
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 12:15:54 PM

I see. Thanks Highlander! Good to know it's not me actually causing it. LOL

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Sancho
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 5:24:14 PM

I've recently had this happen a few times. First time I left it not knowing what to do and poor Ben had to delete it. So next time I did as you and edited it with an afterthought lol.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Fane1024
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 10:26:23 PM

If you can still Edit your extra comment, you should also be able to delete it by clicking on the trash can icon next to the Edit one.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

jimmyhandsome
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 12:14:55 PM
Reply

There could be some interesting ideas with the Vita/PS3, for sure. But that will only go so far for me if I need to buy the same game for 2 different systems for it to be a seamless experience.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

VIVIsectVI
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 1:06:11 PM

I completely agree. If they require you to buy the same game, or precisely 2 full-priced games that connect to each other, they're taking a step in the wrong direction.

Let's say they make God of War 4. On the disc they could have a minigame that you transfer to your Vita. Once you finish the minigame you send the data from the minigame back to your PS3 and it unlocks a skin or something else cosmetic.

To me, that would be a good use of the technology. If developers would rather see dollar signs, they could put the minigame on the Playstation Store. This could happen now with the PSP, but maybe I'm crazy and no one would have any interest in it. The only games I know of that do something similar are Assassin's Creed 2/Bloodlines and Resistance 2/Retribution.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

AugustoDeItalia
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 5:26:22 PM

im sure theyll come up with something interesting, making us buy the game 2 times would be completely irrational. I dont know much about WiiU, do you need to buy a game 2 times? if not, i dont know why sony would make it different, I dont know, using wifi connection or something...

Last edited by AugustoDeItalia on 6/8/2011 5:29:32 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

vicious54
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 1:13:58 PM
Reply

The Nintendo E3 conference used Xbox and PS3 HD game footage in their video presentation to show what the games are going to look like.

www@zdnet@com/blog/hardware/nintendo-used-xbox-ps3-footage-at-wii-u-event/13259

Replace @ with . to see the article if interested.

Hilarious but to get back on topic, I did find some of the features worth reviewing. IMO, the idea of playing your game on the controller if someone wants the tv is the coolest feature but using something like that new 3D set as picture in picture would be something I would be more interested in.

Last edited by vicious54 on 6/8/2011 1:15:14 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

godsdream
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 1:24:03 PM
Reply

This is exactly what I thought. The availability to play games with an extra option. for example, different controls, extra maps, or things like that in the screen. Or maybe this time they finally put the rear view mirror of GT5 or Formula 1 games. Things like that, extra stuff that make integration more interesting and appealing to public. Or simply, the fact that if you purchase PSVita you can have a boosted (better, different, overhauled, etc.) dualshock3. I fact, they can sell or give add-ons where you have extra stuff on screen or different kind of features in certain games. Just hope they don't make us buy 2 games or something, it has to be more like peripheral features.

Last edited by godsdream on 6/8/2011 1:26:49 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

0_o
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 1:32:05 PM
Reply

I remember that I could transfer the save game of FIFA 07 from the PS2 to the PSP and the other way around. :)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

faraga
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 3:30:22 PM

I love your avatar!

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 1:37:58 PM
Reply

The only issue that I have with Sony taking this route is needing to buy the same game on both of their consoles in order to achieve the crossplay. If they could perhaps bundle one of the NVG cards with the blu-ray, or ps3 digital copy on the NVG (or an included memory stick or the like), THEN it'd be far more appealing to me.

What I've seen of the Wii U is far less impressive than I was hoping, but then many here have been spruiking that graphics can't go much further, and we need other forms of innovation. It's an interesting experiment, but one that I'm sure isn't going to stick. It ain't spaghetti.
Peace.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 2:01:58 PM

Lawless, your Aussie-hood is confirmed...

"spruiking?" LOL! I had to look that up, and I worked for NAB for 18 months!

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lawless SXE
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 2:29:12 PM

LOL! Good to know.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

0_o
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 1:47:35 PM
Reply

I'm with you on that, I don't want to buy the same game twice!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Thursday, June 09, 2011 @ 3:12:19 AM

This is what I have been mentioning all along... sell you the Vita "cheap", then hook you for life with expensive games... before too long you would have spent much more on games than the Vita... triple or quadruple...

I am staying away until everything settles down and get to see what value I can really get from it. Not to mention Vita games, like PS3 games, will drop in price... so to beat the system, you wait a year before purchasing the Vita, and by then some of the games will be half price or more...

Personally I will not be doing what I did with PS3 and get 1 day purchases initially... as I am doing now, I will only get 1 or 2 AAA titles a year that are day 1, and the rest when the price comes down. You have to work the system to get value.

There may be an issue with online multiplay though. You may have to purchase a pass if you intend to only go for second hand titles; or wait for original titles to drop in price...

Q!

"play.experience.enjoy"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Temjin001
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 3:16:33 PM
Reply

I have to say the Wii U System has me pretty curious and I find myself reserving fanboy-like excitement over it's impending launch. It's actually an interface that I could see myself enjoying over the long haul. I've always thought Nintendo makes some of the most solid designed games in the biz, with traditional video game design formulas down to a science. They may not have much interest in the story telling side of game design but they sure as heck understand "games" in the traditional sense.
I just sense that it's software draw on my interests may be a short lived one in lew of the other more aggressive and tech-savvy competitors. Plus I suspect hardcore competitive franchises like Tekken and Ninja Gaiden will be "dumbed down" for the different market.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

gray_eagle
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 5:18:58 PM
Reply

if, down the road, a game that will use the ps3 & vita,
the devs could ship both copies together?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

mindmurderer69
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 5:19:06 PM
Reply

i thought they would've gotten that idea from lets say gameboy sp/gamecube hook up. wow if it didn't take them 10+years to see that idea staring them in the face. i seriously thought they shoud've done that with the psp

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

AugustoDeItalia
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 5:24:04 PM
Reply

whats sad is that now everyone will say sony steals ideas from nintendo, first with the move now with the vita. but face it, sony's just making nintendo's stuff in a better way and greater quality, that's the only thing nintendo lacks of: quality. Because they have great ideas, but if they managed to have quality consoles like ps3 and xbox, they would top everything !

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Fane1024
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 10:31:55 PM

"quality consoles...like xbox"

Say what? Never heard of RROD?

The Wii is 100x better made than M$'s POS. Easy to do, because it was last-generation technology, but still...



Last edited by Fane1024 on 6/8/2011 10:34:23 PM

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bloodysilence19
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 6:37:02 PM
Reply

i think everyone steals from someone and just makes it better and improves it alot. if i remember correct the screen on the controller was actually first introduce by Sega with their dream-cast, so tech Nintendo stole from Sega. its like how sega introduce gaming online for consoles first and than other companies followed suit but improved it a lot. kintect is the eyetoy by more advance, ps move is the wii controller more advance and so on and so forth. every takes someones idea and remixes to their fitting but also improves the tech more.


Last edited by Bloodysilence19 on 6/8/2011 6:37:12 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

GuernicaReborn
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 6:49:54 PM
Reply

This is the first I've seen of the Wii U. I googled it, and it looks like a glorified DS. Two screens, one of them is a touch screen. Honestly, I don't get it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Thursday, June 09, 2011 @ 3:45:20 AM
Reply

now that would be f*cking sweet!
only problem will be the wiiU has its controller, its not a gaming system so you only need to buy one game.
PSvita is its own system, so if you want interactivity between the two so you can play your games away from the system you would need 2 games.
would be cool if sony finds a way to let you buy the ps3 version of the game and be able to get the vita version for free!
one thing we need to see if this cross platform things going to work, gets too expensive spending 110 bucks on the ps3 version, plus 70+ bucks for the vita version!
i wish more developers could be like valve, was so sweet getting the PC version of portal 2 from the ps3 version FOR FREE!
shame it was download only so im yet to download it, but it was FREE!!!!!!!!!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JMO_INDY
Thursday, June 09, 2011 @ 11:11:07 AM

Not if their was mirroring such as the Wii U does. This is just something similar, I'm sure mirroring is possible.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Thursday, June 09, 2011 @ 12:22:27 PM

Vita might extend the idea of game sharing to the PS3... in the same way that some PSP games support game sharing between two PSPs...

I don't know if it will, but it's not impossible. Nor is it impossible that the Bluray would include both versions of the game so that you can install the Vita version from the PS3.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JMO_INDY
Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 4:37:48 AM

As Hihlander says it's a simple transference of game saves and not actually mirroring what is happening on either system to the other as I pointed out.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 9:44:55 AM

yes, but what if your not home?
if you want to play a game at home, then continue playing it when your out, then come home and continue, your going to need to have the ps3 and the vita versions of the game.
to be honest i cant see publishers giving us 2 versions of the game, just too costly.
would be nice though.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Robochic
Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 7:51:10 AM
Reply

I think Vita will be really cool, I've been waiting for a new handheld ya I could get another psp but I wanted more :)
On the Vita and Wii U I think both are really cool ideas and the technology is there but Nintendo tends to bring something out cool and work on it and then the games slow right down to a halt like the Wii I haven't bought a new game for my Wii since Epic Mickey there hasn't been one good game that screams BUY ME. so I hope they don't do this with the Wii U and continue to push out the games

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Do you regret buying the PS4 so early?
Nope, I love it!
Not really; I still play it plenty.
A little, I was hoping for more games.
Yes, I could've waited.

Previous Poll Results