Maybe We Shouldn't Be Too Concerned About The Vita's Future
Sometimes, it takes a bit longer to make an obvious connection. My only excuse is that I've been a little overworked lately.
During my hands-on impressions of the PlayStation Vita, I concluded that we're looking at a unit that focuses almost exclusively on the software. It has plenty of great features that undoubtedly contribute to the overall portable experience but succinctly and simply- this is a device designed specifically for gamers.
Now, we learn that the new handheld has topped 1.2 million units sold worldwide. Basically, this means it has sold 600,000 in the US, Europe, and Australia in four days, as a little under 600k have been sold in Japan since the Vita launched on December 17, 2011. That's not bad. In fact, it's above Sony's internal expectations, and critics and new owners alike seem satisfied with the new hardware. But of course, there's one big question that begs to be answered.
After the Vita launched in Japan, sales dropped. Of course, the excited gamers, the first adopters, so-to-speak, sprang to stores within the first week and as a result, subsequent weeks showed a big drop-off. The same is sure to happen in other regions. It's just the nature of the business and really, this applies to most any new product; the avid, anticipatory consumers will have the product within the first few days, while the rest - those undecided - will wait. And they'll certainly wait longer than a week or two. So how will the Vita continue to sell well?
Well...duh. The games! That's the aforementioned disconnect to which I alluded; if the Vita is all about software, and gamers have already responded, the way to keep sales satisfactory is to keep pumping out the games. And oh yes, that's what the Vita does; that's where it excels. So perhaps this is the easiest solution to what initially appeared to be a highly complex issue; a gaming device prompts gamers everywhere to respond, and down the road, more games come and more gamers respond.
See? Simple.
Tags: vita, playstation vita, vita sales, vita numbers, sony
2/28/2012 9:04:06 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (39 posts)
Dancemachine55
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 @ 9:44:55 PM
Reply
And with many Western developers getting behind it, I only hope that it does better in the US and lasts longer than the poor PSP.
Don't get me wrong, PSP was great and no where near a flop, but it just wasn't as popular in the US or Europe as the DS. PSP was a Japanese thing, so I think Sony is trying to turn that around with the Vita focusing on more Western games.
I007spectre
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 @ 9:51:03 PM
Reply
TheAgingHipster
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 @ 9:57:03 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 @ 10:24:41 PM
Clamedeus
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 6:56:17 AM
TheAgingHipster
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 @ 9:56:40 PM
Reply
The Vita isn't just a portable game unit--it's the whole console experience literally in the palm of your hands.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 @ 10:32:09 PM
Reply
telly
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 9:40:36 AM
Cesar_ser_4
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 @ 11:49:22 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 12:27:20 AM
Killa Tequilla
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 12:37:43 AM
Beamboom
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 2:31:43 AM
Killa Tequilla
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 3:22:11 AM
Sorry for going off topic a little bit, Ben.
Rogueagent01
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 4:18:37 AM
I don't like playing on handhelds, I never have and most likely never will. Even though I have owned a Gameboy, still own my PSP-3000, and plan on getting the Vita it surely isn't for the games. I will also use it as my browser.
Beamboom
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 4:49:41 AM
I'm... I'm out of words. You guys are... *C*R*A*Z*Y*.
Last edited by Beamboom on 2/29/2012 4:52:31 AM
Fane1024
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 5:23:40 AM
If the browser proves to be stable (unlike the one on the PS3), that alone would perhaps a greater draw than the games, since I currently have no commute nor the funds to travel.
I'm sure that I would play it at home on occasion, but my PSP sits unused despite my having a number of unplayed PSP games.
Before anyone asks: I don't have a smart phone or a tablet or a PC/laptop that can run a modern browser in my apartment, so my PS3 is my main internet connection. And, yes, that really sucks.
Last edited by Fane1024 on 2/29/2012 5:28:36 AM
Beamboom
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 5:57:18 AM
Then gimme a shout and we'll play a round of UniWar together. It's a quite cool turn-based strategy game. And it's like a dollar. :)
(... And according to the reviews the Vita browser suck. It does not support the latest internet standards, nor flash)
Last edited by Beamboom on 2/29/2012 6:20:09 AM
daus26
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 9:39:45 AM
Right now devices needs to be shown as being versatile, while keeping its core focus strong. Just look how the phone isn't marketed as JUST a phone, or the Tablet as JUST a computer, or the iPod Touch as JUST a MP3 player.
Don't get me wrong, the games are needed (duh!) as it's a gaming device, but if you want customers to see more value out of it, which it does, then they better show it to the masses.
@beamboom
The problem with a smartphone or laptop is that it's not gonna get you anywhere close to the experience you get from the Vita. Personally, I want to get the Vita for its unique gaming experience (back touch pad, dual analogs), but if it's just limited to games, then I'm just gonna wait for it. Because of that, I'm earning myself towards a laptop right now, which is what you suggested.. but you know that's not a solution to wanting to game on the Vita and chat with your friends or whatever nifty things it should do other than games. Just because other devices can do it, doesn't mean that it can do it like the Vita does.
Beamboom
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 3:03:50 PM
I've never said anything about the gaming capabilities of the Vita. Read their posts again. To quote Rogue, "I don't like playing on handhelds, I never have and most likely never will." and "getting the Vita it surely isn't for the games. I will also use it as my browser" -> You don't buy a Vita for the browser or the chat client. It just doesn't make sense.
And the reason I suggested something else than a Vita for Fane1024 (and for him specifically) was because he has no computer and wanted something other than the PS3 to use to access the Internet. Again, that's not why you should buy a Vita.
Vita's only real purpose is as a gaming machine, that's where it excels. But the Vita is *not* a general purpose device. It's a niche device, made specifically for gaming.
Last edited by Beamboom on 2/29/2012 3:04:55 PM
Rogueagent01
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 7:25:27 PM
Though I own about a dozen games for it(PSP) I probably haven't even logged a 100 hours of playtime on it. I have about 20 movies for it and 4 memory cards full of music as well, and that is what I use it for. The Vita will be a similar device for me the browser, music, and chat options are some of the big selling points to me. I will be getting the 3G version so that it is mobile. Sorry but carrying a Vita around to access the browser is not crazy to me, I hate cell phones and don't ever plan on buying a smart phone. And carrying a laptop or PS3 is obviously isn't an option. I also like to collect everything involved with gaming so that is another reason that I want a Vita.
I don't own a smart phone the cellphone I have has a browser which makes the PS3s look like it is from 30 years into the future, my computer doesn't work, I don't own a laptop, and the PS3 isn't mobile so the 3G Vita is actually a good choice for what I am looking for. Plus many members of my clan have already said they want one making it a chat option for us.
Fane1024
Thursday, March 01, 2012 @ 1:54:13 AM
Why should I spend more money to get a device I don't want to use instead of less money for one I want to use? I don't own a recent PC for a reason: Windows. And I should pay for a ridiculously expensive mobile phone contract just to have a browser? WTF?
Last edited by Fane1024 on 3/1/2012 1:59:15 AM
daus26
Friday, March 02, 2012 @ 11:41:00 AM
I mean, why use a different device for chatting while you're gaming or using the Vita? That's like having an Ipod Touch when you already have an iPhone.
Axe99
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 2:47:33 AM
Reply
___________
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 3:32:31 AM
Reply
what im worried about is cost, reliability and stupid pain in the a$$ restrictions!
350-419 just for the device, plus minimum 30 for a mandatory memory card, plus 70 bucks per game, is a metric sh*t ton of money to spend on a portable gaming device!
then theres the reliability issues, the sleeping death people are complaining about.
being unable to get the system out of sleep mode besides doing a hard reset.
then the black dot issues the OLED screen is having.
then the OS problems its having.
im really disappointed, i had my JP vita for 2 full months and it worked PERFECTLY!
i get my AU vita and first time use it freezes on the home screen.
i reset, and ever since every time i start a game i can play it for about 30 minutes then the OS goes up sh*t creek and the touch screen stops responding.
forcing me to do a hard reset then everythings fine.
f*cking corrupted my game save for golden abyss, 14 hours down the f*cking drain thanks $ony!
then last night my vita was on sleep and i was watching TV and it decided take itself off sleep, and open the camera and take a photo.
WTF!?
its $onys spies all over again!
then the stupid restrictions like the restriction to how many units allowed linked per device.
or the ridiculous overpriced memory cards, or the ridiculously overpriced USB cable, or the ridiculously overpriced charger.
or the restriction to 1 PSN account.
what $ony has done with the vita is make the best device possible, with the best games possible, and totally destroyed it with their usual bull sh*t greediness!
Cesar_ser_4
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 4:37:30 AM
___________
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 7:51:27 AM
Cesar_ser_4
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 9:44:08 AM
DazeOfWar
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 11:23:09 AM
Axe99
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 3:06:50 PM
Superman915
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 7:37:41 AM
Reply
gumbi
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 8:31:01 AM
Superman915
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 @ 10:56:48 PM
phade2blaq
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 10:16:30 PM
Reply

See Full Image









inkme101
Reply
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 @ 9:37:26 PM