Sony: No Vita Price Cut In 2012, Focus On "Realizing Potential"
Well, it seems the corporation is at odds with the consumers.
Despite the fact that the majority of participants in our latest poll said the price of the PlayStation Vita needs to fall immediately, Sony Worldwide Studios boss Shuhei Yoshida has said it's "absolutely too early" for a Vita price cut.
Yoshida reiterated what we've heard many times before from Sony, that the new portable is a tremendous value:
"From the value for money standpoint, we think we have a good price for what the system is. Our priority is to achieve the potential through more games and services.
Of course people who are looking to buy are also talking about the price of PS Vita, especially when they have to buy a memory card as well. That's something we have to spend time to cost reduce and address in the future. But now, our laser focus is to increase the content and to realise the potential of the system."
It's certainly true that if you give the gamer more bang for his buck, the more likely he will be to drop the necessary cash. So expanding on Vita content is a must, and if they can manage to pump out some huge fantastic titles (the standalone Assassin's Creed III: Liberation leaps to mind), it will become that much more attractive. But as for a price cut...not yet.
For the record, Vita sales stand at about 1.8 million units; that's the international number as of March 31. However, Sony anticipates a combined 16 million Vita and PSP sales by the end of the year.
Tags: vita, playstation vita, vita price, vita cost, sony
6/6/2012 8:24:30 PM John Shepard
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (35 posts)
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 10:01:05 PM
oONewcloudOo
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 10:35:14 PM
Shams
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 12:14:44 AM
Shams
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 10:07:24 AM
BikerSaint
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 9:57:13 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 10:00:34 PM
Reply
I'm happy waiting for that. I'll just sit around with my old PSP waiting for Final Fantasy Type-O.
SayWord
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 11:16:31 PM
Veitsknight
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 10:09:31 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 11:09:32 PM
Veitsknight
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 12:19:51 AM
Veitsknight
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 12:33:18 AM
Rogueagent01
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 10:52:24 PM
Reply
And as Biker said every unit should come with a starter memory card, that to me is the first crucial step.
Last edited by Rogueagent01 on 6/6/2012 10:53:29 PM
jimmyhandsome
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 8:47:41 AM
Jawknee
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 10:49:59 AM
kraygen
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 11:47:15 PM
Reply
I think they need to get the ps1 usable, start doing some back and forth releases of vita exclusives and vita/ps3 full crossplay games.
Exclusives so that make you need the vita, crossplay games like ps all stars are great too, because you can play at home and then take it with you. I really think ps all stars is great for vita because if you're out and only have a few minutes you could jump into an online match and be done.
If Sony focuses on content the vita could easily be worth the $300 and for those phone lovers with a huge bill each month, learn some love for skype and save yourself some money.
I just think price drop is the quick and easy solution for a quick sell, make the vita worth more and it'll sell anyway.
___________
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 6:04:54 AM
Reply
Highlander
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 11:43:49 AM
Funny how everyone was so amazed by the $250 price because they'd all expected something much higher, and yet now the knives are out over the price. Good god people, the hardware far outclasses any smartphone on sale today, and any smartphone that even comes close sells for $600 without a 2 year $60/month phone plan.
Comparing the price of the Vita (which is brand spanking new) to a 5 and a half year old home console is not really a very fair comparison. It's more of an apples and oranges comparison considering the vastly different hardware involved. But then you already know that.
firesoul453
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 6:17:58 AM
Reply
jimmyhandsome
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 8:54:19 AM
Reply
I think that most gamers (myself included) don't necessarily game on the go, but would still be willing to buy a Vita if there was some great exclusive content that isn't available on the PS3. I was greatly disappointed with the lack of Vita content at their E3 presentation. I was honestly expecting a handful of announcements. A CoD logo and an AC3 spinoff didn't do it for me.
Was hoping for a price cut around the holiday season. I think Sony might look back on this decision with some regret.
Highlander
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 12:16:08 PM
The cross play functionality (and transfarring) are both great things for anyone who is not at their PS3. Vita is not intended for people to use instead of their PS3. Which is how you seem to expect it to work when you say "Focusing on making PS1 classics available and making games with cross-play functionality doesn't do much for people who would just rather play them on their PS3."
That's great and all, but when you're not at home and your PS3 isn't available, wouldn't it be great if the hand held you are carrying could give you most of the same things that your Ps3 does? That's the point of the Vita.
jimmyhandsome
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 12:36:32 PM
I was hoping that Sony would reveal a bunch of titles (like they did at last year's E3) that were exclusive to just the Vita. Maybe I had set my expectations too high, but I really wanted Sony to give me a reason (or 2, or 3) to go out and buy the Vita.
Beamboom
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 12:45:13 PM
Highlander
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 1:13:33 PM
Beamboom
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 2:01:15 PM
I don't see how that really changes anything though. Why buy any system, handheld or nolt, as long as there's very little you want to play on it? I believe that's how Jimmy thinks, and it most definitely is how I think too.
I need a *reason* to buy it. And that reason is not to play games better played on the PS3.
Last edited by Beamboom on 6/7/2012 2:02:36 PM
Fane1024
Friday, June 08, 2012 @ 6:14:15 PM
I feel the opposite: what will get me to buy the Vita isn't games exclusive to that device, but the ability to play games that I bought for my PS3 on the handheld as well. I never bought most of the "offshoot" PSP games from existing franchises (and not too many unique exclusives) because I'd rather spend my time with my phat beauty than her portable cousin. Taking a PS3 game on the go with a shared save is very appealing, however, but not enough to buy the game twice.
PS1 Classics and minis aren't enough to justify $250+, but there are instances where Sony is making new games work on both systems (not the same exact code, but both versions for one purchase). If this trend continues, my interest in Vita will increase greatly. A lot of the PSN games I own could easily run on Vita (again, not the exact code, but in terms of power requirements).
Last edited by Fane1024 on 6/8/2012 6:27:24 PM
josiahlo
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 5:28:44 PM
Reply
Unfortunately I believe the Vita and the 3DS will be the last standalone portable gaming systems. Phones will be the only form of portable gaming.
Highlander
Thursday, June 07, 2012 @ 11:16:05 PM
Kevin Butler VP of...stuff at Sony;
"It's also got what we in the future call buttons, which turn out to be pretty important to those handful of millions of people who enjoy playing shooters, platformers, well, anything that doesn't involve catching a big red ball."
"Who wants to pretend their hand is a gun? What is this? The third grade? Pew! Pew! Pew! Pew!"
Jawknee
Friday, June 08, 2012 @ 1:21:14 PM
Robochic
Saturday, June 09, 2012 @ 12:29:34 PM
Reply

See Full Image









dbyzforce
Reply
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 9:49:24 PM