Should The Vita Be More Like The PSP?
Bear with me for a moment.
I firmly believe the PlayStation Vita proved something at Gamescom. Or rather, that Sony proved something about their intentions with the Vita, as it's clear they will be lending it plenty of support. And they'll be the first to tell you they are giving it far more support than the PSP received early in its life span, due to their almost immediate shift in focus to the PS3.
However, although I remain duly impressed, I just remembered why I played games on my PSP. I'm not big into handheld entertainment and really never have been since the days of the original GameBoy. But I played certain titles on the PSP (Final Fantasy IV: Complete Collection, Final Fantasy Tactics: War of the Lions, etc.) because I quite simply couldn't find them on the PS3. JRPGs and other "old-fashioned" styles of gaming were rapidly falling by the wayside but if I still wanted them, I could turn to the PSP. Old-school RPG fans know very well how valuable the PSP has been.
But with the Vita, we've got the technology to bring the heavy hitters to the portable realm, so that's what Sony is doing. Assassin's Creed, Call of Duty, Killzone, LittleBigPlanet, etc. That's great. But isn't that basically what we already have on consoles, only in on-the-go form? These aren't really different experiences, are they? I suppose they're different thanks to some nifty handheld tech, like the front and rear touchscreens, tilt functionality, and camera, but the gameplay is pretty familiar. We might never see stuff like Tactics Ogre or Persona, will we? Well, they might still exist on the PSN, which the Vita can access, of course.
I'm just wondering if it's the best idea to turn the Vita into a portable PS3, which appears to be Sony's goal. I repeat, it is impressive and I think it's a fabulous piece of hardware and I do play it. That being said, I still believe Sony should focus on bringing unique experiences to the Vita that aren't just slightly smaller versions of the big boys in the console realm. And if that includes some old-school stuff in a fresher package, why not?
Tags: vita, playstation vita, psp, vita games, psp games
8/16/2012 9:28:31 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (29 posts)
DazeOfWar
Thursday, August 16, 2012 @ 10:50:40 PM
TheAgingHipster
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 7:17:30 AM
mustang750r
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 8:45:40 AM
Temjin001
Thursday, August 16, 2012 @ 10:22:02 PM
Reply
Ultimately, I prettty much see this as the face of the future and basically right now. Hardware and tech is basically second fiddle to talent and investment publishers sink in to these products. I have no doubt many of next-gen's games may appear better visually and or from a graphical standpoint, but I think only the most talented and deeply invested games will standout as the most ground breaking, 8gb of RAM or 2.5TFLOPS of processing, or not.
DazeOfWar
Thursday, August 16, 2012 @ 10:49:00 PM
Reply
Besides that I like that I have a portable PS3 pretty much but I do hope that developers still make great JRPGs and other games you don't see on consoles.
sawao_yamanaka
Thursday, August 16, 2012 @ 10:54:51 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, August 16, 2012 @ 11:09:11 PM
Reply
DazeOfWar
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 1:33:51 AM
Highlander
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 12:00:13 AM
Reply
That said, I want as many JRPG experiences on the Vita as possible...made *specifically* for the Vita.
CrusaderForever
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 12:21:49 AM
Reply
joBucket
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 2:12:53 AM
Reply
Ultimadream
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 2:43:24 AM
Reply
Tearaway is a great example of a title which stand out on a console, it is fresh and exciting & it makes use of all the consoles features in a creative way. I usually hate touch screen or motion technology ( I hate move and the DS's pen) But I really was impressed by all Tearaways features rather than being annoyed.
Don't get my wrong I love playing classic games on the go, but they should just be re-released on the PS Store rather than made specifically for the portable console now that the Vita can access the stores PS1 games. Developers should focus on bringing new franchises to the system.
Ultima
Monday, August 27, 2012 @ 11:52:33 AM
SmokeyPSD
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 3:45:38 AM
Reply
It doesn't have to be one or the other. It's even full inclusive with all those horrible "mobile games" that are coming from the playstation mobile suite.
Beamboom
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 6:55:50 AM
Reply
If I saw something like a Crush! sequel for the Vita that would have drawn me so immensely much more to the platform than any of my console favorite franchises ever could. When I look at my gaming behaviour on my smartphone I play completely different games there than I prefer to do on my PS3.
COD & co is *not* the savior for this platform.
Last edited by Beamboom on 8/17/2012 6:56:19 AM
TheAgingHipster
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 7:22:54 AM
Beamboom
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 5:48:19 PM
I consider myself to be pretty mainstream. Usually my opinion about a game matches the metascore perfectly. I like pretty much every genre as long as the game is good enough. Simply put.
But I don't want to play the same kind of games on a mobile gaming unit as I do on my console, for a long array of reasons. And if I am in any way a representative of the mainstream here, then this is how they think too.
Last edited by Beamboom on 8/17/2012 5:50:42 PM
___________
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 7:57:03 AM
Reply
ok we wont have survival horror games and other niche genres simply because their too risky.
so why not bring them to the cheaper to develop for vita?
obviously not now because 2 dogs and their sheep have bought it, but eventually once it picks up.
hopefully will see the revival of some abandoned franchises too, i really, really, REALLY hope $ony bend is beavering away at a syphon filter game for the vita as we speak!
their last game was golden abyss, so what have they been doing for the past 4 months?
probably defiantly ps4 stuff, but hopefully it involves the vita and syphon filter as well.
gumbi
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 8:43:12 AM
Reply
Personally, I would like to see more titles like Gravity Rush. Gravity Rush felt and played like a proper console game, but was exclusive to Vita and had gameplay features that are unique to Vita. It's exactly what I wanted from my Vita, a console-like experience in the palm of my hands. I know I've said this before but if you own a Vita you should really get Gravity Rush. It's great.
amonte64
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 9:01:06 AM
Reply
PlayStation Vita can play PlayStation 3 retail and PlayStation Network games, so Sony should do the, purchase a PS3 retail or PSN game also play on your PSVita, on all games. The possibilities are limitless, start playing a game at home on your PS3, continue playing it on your PSVita ANYWHERE. They would be the only console maker to do this and the only one that are able to. And the only games PSVita exclusive are games that can ONLY be played on PSVita and cannot be played on PS3 because of whatever reason, relies heavily on touch screen, rear touch, reason like that, like Tearaway. They would dominate the video game world.
A myriad of people would want to buy a PS3 and a PSVita, many more games and games they wouldn't have bought otherwise. I had pretty much no interest in PSVita, but since Sony announced purchase once play also play on your PSVita, I REALLY want one, and I'm going to buy one if it becomes standard for all PS3 retail and PSN games or at least all first party and a lot of third party games. Also, I wouldn't have bought Ratchet & Clank: Q Force or Sly 4 if it wasn't for this. EA said they are considering doing this for NFS: Most Wanted, I wasn't going to buy that game but if EA does it, I will buy it. And if I own a PSVita of course I'm going to buy the exclusive games that can only be played on it like Tearaway.
There is absolutely no logical reason why consumers wouldn't want this or support this. We all should let our voices heard that this should happen.
Highlander
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 11:26:47 AM
No, the Vita can NOT run retail PS3 games. That simply is not possible. It can run games that have been developed for both platforms, and there can be cross play and save transferring. But, I'm sorry, there is no way in the world that the Vita can actually run a retail PS3 game. The hardware is a) too different and b) not anything like as powerful as the PS3.
amonte64
Saturday, August 18, 2012 @ 3:32:52 AM
Highlander
Saturday, August 18, 2012 @ 6:32:11 AM
Highlander
Saturday, August 18, 2012 @ 6:32:55 AM
Fane1024
Friday, August 17, 2012 @ 7:37:32 PM
Reply
On the other hand, I'd love to be able to make progress on my PS3 games when I'm away from my TV.
Last edited by Fane1024 on 8/17/2012 7:39:23 PM

See Full Image









sawao_yamanaka
Reply
Thursday, August 16, 2012 @ 10:21:53 PM